DomainK Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 Anyone watched this one? What did it look like? Watson to Chanderpaul, OUT, another loose forward prod from Chanders to one pitching closer to off stump, there's a noise before Haddin collects, no reaction from the umpire and we have a review. For the second time involving Chanderpaul, several replays are reviewed and again Hotspot is inconclusive. Is it bat flipping pad? Australia don't look pleased. Second time Chanders has been involved in a caught-behind review. Ponting, who asked for the review, leads the celebrations when the outcome is OUT. Hotspot didn't show anything but the review works for the Australians this time. Chanders is gone for a fighting 62. The bowling change works and a dangerous stand is snapped. This one was far less convincing that the first appeal last session. Chanders shakes his head and walks off. Crucial breakthrough from Watson. Link to comment
kabira Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 Did not see it. If its inconclusive, then on field umpires decision should be upheld. Link to comment
Pak_Fan_4_Eva Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 Dunno about this one but i like this new review system. I`m sure it`ll be a success Link to comment
DomainK Posted December 4, 2009 Author Share Posted December 4, 2009 Dunno about this one but i like this new review system. I`m sure it`ll be a success Of course. It's all about minimizing mistakes. No system can ever eliminate all mistakes. Link to comment
DomainK Posted December 4, 2009 Author Share Posted December 4, 2009 Did not see it. If its inconclusive, then on field umpires decision should be upheld. That's the problem, if hot spot does not pick it, it's conclusive in favor of the batsman. Link to comment
cowboysfan Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 there was no conclusive proof to overturn that decision.we need the kinks to be worked out pretty soon or the whole concept will be shelved. Link to comment
Karan114 Posted December 4, 2009 Share Posted December 4, 2009 there was no conclusive proof to overturn that decision.we need the kinks to be worked out pretty soon or the whole concept will be shelved. Frankly speaking, our players are not interested in the system (as shown by their refusal to use it in this series), and anything our players/BCCI don't want will struggle to be implemented. Not saying this is right or wrong (personally I am interested that it is implemented albeit with these little mistakes to be avoided) but that is how it is Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now