Texy Posted December 17, 2009 Share Posted December 17, 2009 New Delhi: Should a woman who has been lying unconscious in a Mumbai hospital for 36 years be allowed to die or be left in the current vegetative state? That was the question put before the Supreme Court on Thursday when it said that “under the law of the country, we cannot allow a person to dieâ€. The remarks by a Bench comprising Chief Justice KG Balakrishnan and Justices AK Ganguly and BS Chauhan came when a direction was sought that the woman be not fed. The Bench sought a response from the Centre and Maharashtra government on a petition moved by 59-year-old Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug who has been lying in a vegetative state for last 36 years in Mumbai’s KEM hospital after being sexually assaulted by a sweeper. The Bench, which was hesitant to entertain the petition, agreed to issue the notice after advocate Shekhar Nafde explained it is not the case of “euthanasia†and the plea on behalf of the hapless woman was moved by her friend Pinki Virani. “This is no human right. Her life is worse than animal existence,†the advocate said referring to Shanbaug. He said Shanbaug, who had joined as a nurse in the KEM hospital in 1966, was sexually assaulted in 1973, rendered immobile and unconscious and has been bedridden after the incident. The petition sought a direction for the state government and Municipal Corporation of Brihanmumbai to carry out tests to ascertain the medical condition of the woman. What's your opinion? should the court entertain the petition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kabira Posted December 17, 2009 Share Posted December 17, 2009 miracles do happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CricketGirl Posted December 17, 2009 Share Posted December 17, 2009 is she likely to recover?? where are her family and why havent they had a say in this?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gunner Posted December 17, 2009 Share Posted December 17, 2009 YES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texy Posted December 17, 2009 Author Share Posted December 17, 2009 is she likely to recover?? where are her family and why havent they had a say in this?? she has been like that for 36 yrs!! chances of her recovery is less than 0.01% ...apparently her family abandoned her...pretty sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
satishg Posted December 17, 2009 Share Posted December 17, 2009 If she is not willing to live in this misery then yes she should be allowed to die. 36 years is a bloody long time and if miracles dont happen in such a long period then it will never happen. So Yes she should be atleast allowed to die peacefully! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhanu Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 yes..Thier is a limit and 36 is just too long...if she is really gona come back to live then she will come when they are about to take off the plug Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 miracles do happen. what hapens till then? she continues to rot? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CricketGirl Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 she has been like that for 36 yrs!! chances of her recovery is less than 0.01% ...apparently her family abandoned her...pretty sad. well then yes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Blaster Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 I'd take death please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts