ViruRulez Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 The news channel are flashing it right now. Bal Thackeray has lambasted even Ambani now for saying country comes first. He has reportedly mentioned in the latest issue of Saamna. Bachchan and then Tendulkar and then Ambani. It looks like the Thackerays are now digging their own grave. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
ViruRulez Posted January 29, 2010 Author Posted January 29, 2010 Ambani had told yesterday that Mumbai belongs to all Indians in a NDTV interview. 1hGvzjGDhb4
EnterTheVoid Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Thackery is a senile old dog, useless trouble maker. What has he and his useless cronies ever done other than provoke people into needless conflicts ?
suma25 Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Both are useless looking after their own needs.
achilles Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 I watched a bit of Mukesh Ambani's opinion on NDTV 24/7
Desi Cartman Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 Thackeray said, "when 'Pandit Mukesh Ambani' says Mumbai, Chennai and Delhi belong to all Indians, why has he left out cities likes Ahmedabad, Jamnagar and Rajkot". I know what he means by mentioning all Gujju cities but WTF does he want him to say , name all cities , towns and villages of India to get his point across ?
achilles Posted January 29, 2010 Posted January 29, 2010 ^ You seem to have a point. *Calls a taxi so that you can take the next train, flight, cab out of Mumbai*
Lurker Posted January 30, 2010 Posted January 30, 2010 I know what he means by mentioning all Gujju cities but WTF does he want him to say ' date= name all cities , towns and villages of India to get his point across ? For two reasons, me thinks: a) Shiv Sena's very first target in its quest for Marathi-Manoos were the Gujrati migrants in 50s and 60s. This happened much before they turned their tirades towards Tamil-Muslims-Bihari/UPites in that order. There is a chance he is hinting at that past. b) Many North Indian migrants faced the problem in Ahmedabad sometime back. There was this anti North Indian sentiments fanned by Gujrati politicians(mostly right wing) that was no different to what SS propounds. So maybe he is asking them to look inwards and why not take a fare share of migrants themselves?
patriot Posted January 30, 2010 Posted January 30, 2010 For two reasons, me thinks: a) Shiv Sena's very first target in its quest for Marathi-Manoos were the Gujrati migrants in 50s and 60s. This happened much before they turned their tirades towards Tamil-Muslims-Bihari/UPites in that order. There is a chance he is hinting at that past. b) Many North Indian migrants faced the problem in Ahmedabad sometime back. There was this anti North Indian sentiments fanned by Gujrati politicians(mostly right wing) that was no different to what SS propounds. So maybe he is asking them to look inwards and why not take a fare share of migrants themselves? Man...talk about butting your head into anything and everything without an iota of knowledge. You moron, Shiv Sena itself was formed in the late 60's , I think 1967 , so where does the question of " attack " on Gujarati Migrants in the 50's arise.:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Shiv Sena have NEVER attacked Gujaratis unlike Tamils and Kannads, only grudged against their hold over Mumbai . Yet another example of a Lurking moron, lurking in places he should'nt be.:hysterical:
Lurker Posted January 30, 2010 Posted January 30, 2010 Man...talk about butting your head into anything and everything without an iota of knowledge. You moron, Shiv Sena itself was formed in the late 60's , I think 1967 , so where does the question of " attack " on Gujarati Migrants in the 50's ar Shiv Sena have NEVER attacked Gujaratis unlike Tamils and Kannads, only grudged against their hold over Mumbai . Yet another example of a Lurking moron, lurking in places he should'nt be Here you go ace. The early objective of the Shiv Sena was to ensure job security for Maharashtrians against immigrants from southern India, Gujaratis and Marwaris. You were saying....... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bal_Thackeray
patriot Posted January 30, 2010 Posted January 30, 2010 Here you go ace. You were saying....... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bal_Thackeray LOL...shameless. Do you still standby your 1950's argument of Shiv Sena attacking Gujarati or you accept that as usual you were talkign off your backside ??? Again , LEARN TO COMPREHEND AND READ, I am clearly saying that Shiv Sena NEVER has attacked any Gujarati migrant like it has done to Southies in the 60's and 70's. it was formed to make your that the Marathi Manoos don't loose their jobs to migrant communities including Gujaratis. I don't believe you are so dumb.
DomainK Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Raj Thackray is much smarter than Bal Thackaray. He attacked poor cabbies and had a banter with Amitabh who was quite on the decline. But the oldie has been messing with the wrong guys. First Sachin and now Ambani.:hehe:
Lurker Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 LOL...shameless. Do you still standby your 1950's argument of Shiv Sena attacking Gujarati or you accept that as usual you were talkign off your backside ??? Again , LEARN TO COMPREHEND AND READ, I am clearly saying that Shiv Sena NEVER has attacked any Gujarati migrant like it has done to Southies in the 60's and 70's. Clutching for straws as always moron?? Is there a scale that you go by? 1000 killed will make for an attack, 10 killed will not? What kind of moronic argument is that SS did not go after Gujaratis as they went against Tamil? SS is basically stopping Indians from moving into Bombay. Who, apart from retards like you, cares if the "attack" was not as "strong". I suggest you start eating some garlic for your cholestrol and maybe some fish as well..Bongs will tell you they are good for brains. ****. :giggle:
suma25 Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 ^ ^ .yea Raj iis smarter than his uncle and his cousin. Both are eyeing the bmc elections that is in 2012 Sena is going by the same old route ,MNS is going by wait and watch policy ..as in wait what the sena does and if it has something positive gains jump on it and hijack it completely Besides MNS has N indians and muslim workers(sizable) dalit or more than what sena has
patriot Posted February 1, 2010 Posted February 1, 2010 Clutching for straws as always moron?? Is there a scale that you go by? 1000 killed will make for an attack, 10 killed will not? What kind of moronic argument is that SS did not go after Gujaratis as they went against Tamil? SS is basically stopping Indians from moving into Bombay. Who, apart from retards like you, cares if the "attack" was not as "strong". I suggest you start eating some garlic for your cholestrol and maybe some fish as well..Bongs will tell you they are good for brains. Retard. :giggle: Shiv Sena born in the late 60's but started attacking Gujus in the 50's . LOL. Still stand by that you *********** ?
Recommended Posts