Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a question man. Since Punjab was all part of India. And now theres a Punjab in Pakistan and in India, does it mean they were all the same people and could have same ancestry?

Posted

Re: MundaPakistani

I have a question man. Since Punjab was all part of India. And now theres a Punjab in Pakistan and in India' date=' does it mean they were all the same people and could have same ancestry?[/quote'] yes. infact all the non dravidian inhabitants of northern region of the indian sub continent share a common ancestry. this does not include however, the inhabitants of assam and the other north eastern states and bhutan. the punjabi, the rajasthani and the marwari are all decendents from a single gene pool. i d say the uttar pradeshi and the bihari could be tossed into that category too.
Posted

Re: MundaPakistani This is true, but statistically speaking you are more likely to find ... ... say a Pakistani Muslim Rajput who despite being 'South Asian' will have some Turkomen, Afghani, Uzbek, Turkish, etc. etc. (something in that large ethnically amorphous area) lineage. And even the ones who have virtually no West Asian lineage end up acquiring that orientation so that they view themselves as South Asian Arabs--I know you think I'm crazy but a lot my close Pak. friends who look VERY INDIAN become VERY INSULTED when someone white says something like, ... "Yeah, yeah ... Pakistani/Indian same thing." They usually counter with: "I'm of Arab descent." What went on about 1300-1000 years ago in the areas around the Hijaz is now happening in South Asia. Non-Arabs by virtue of their religious conversion see themselves as biologically Arab. Egyptians, the inhabitants of the Levant, even Iraqis were never Arab, but slowly changed their perspective. Same thing is happing in south Asia currently. I would not be surprised if in 500 years Pakistan changed their name from the 'Islamic Republic of Pak.' to the 'Arabic Islamic Republic of Pak.'

Posted

Re: MundaPakistani

I have a question man. Since Punjab was all part of India. And now theres a Punjab in Pakistan and in India' date=' does it mean they were all the same people and could have same ancestry?[/quote'] BTW, it's a mistake to view Pakistan is homogeneous. It's as diverse (if not more) than India for it's size. Even within the Pakistani Punjab, you will have VERY INDIAN Pakistanis and Pakistanis who are more West/Central Asian than they are Subcontinental. For example, I can point out Hindus who look like carbon copies of Javed Miandad or Shoaib Malik, but it would very difficult to point out a Hindu who looks like Umar Gul or Imran Khan.
Guest dada_rocks
Posted

Re: MundaPakistani EVERYTHING IS SAME IF ANY MOVEMENT HAPPENED IT HAPPENED FROM INDIA HENCE SOUTH NORTH HARDLY MATTERS THEY ALL ARE SAME

Posted

Re: MundaPakistani THey were talkin about Sajid Mahmood he has hindu ancestry. Also Players like Sami, Rana Naved, Shoaib Malik, Javed, Waqar, could all pass for Hindus.

Guest dada_rocks
Posted

Re: MundaPakistani Pakistan even has a Gujarat my local butcher is gujarati pakistani and he has this impresison of me being muslim and is so chummy with me .. I never bothered to correct him :lmao: why sud I after all he makes sure to call me whenever fresh goat-meat arrives.. :wtg:

Posted

Re: MundaPakistani

but it would very difficult to point out a Hindu who looks like Umar Gul or Imran Khan.
That's not true. Lotsa hindus in kashmir, or the ones who moved from the afghanistan areas (like my grand-dad) during the partition have similar features. In fact, umar gul's face is a very typical punjabi face even though he's a pathan.
Posted

Re: MundaPakistani

but it would very difficult to point out a Hindu who looks like Umar Gul or Imran Khan.
That's not true. Lotsa hindus in kashmir, or the ones who moved from the afghanistan areas (like my grand-dad) during the partition have similar features. In fact, umar gul's face is a very typical punjabi face even though he's a pathan.
With all due respect , Umar Gul is a horse faced ugly looking dude whereas Punjabi's in general are good looking people. Probably the best looking people in India, in my opinion.
Guest dada_rocks
Posted

Re: MundaPakistani

dada...i like mutton more than chicken...but which is healthier.?..i read some where that red meat is not good for body...though i not heavily into non-veg...
Same here, there is no better tastign food than mutton but it happens to be red . I would say go little easy on mutton intake once a fotnight i restrict it to. well my wife is vegetarian so I myself have turned into a virtual ghashahari..
Posted

Re: MundaPakistani

With all due respect , Umar Gul is a horse faced ugly looking dude whereas Punjabi's in general are good looking people. Probably the best looking people in India, in my opinion.
lol, have u been to villages in punjab ? that's the real punjab, and i've been to plenty 'coz that's where i'm from. Yeah he's not good looking, but those features aren't that rare to find in punjab is all i'm saying. Btw, most male models in India come from the haryanawi jats than punjab.
Posted

Re: MundaPakistani

i have yet to hear from Mundapakistani
Sorry buddy i was out of town!
I have a question man. Since Punjab was all part of India. And now theres a Punjab in Pakistan and in India, does it mean they were all the same people and could have same ancestry?
Yes that's true. Interesting thing is that my great great grand father was a Sikh hence my last name is one of the most common Sikh names.
Posted

Re: MundaPakistani

so if great great grandfather was sikh' date=' how did u end up bein muslim?[/quote'] because he later converted to Islam, i don't know exactly how or when.
MP , Do you still have relatives in India . Also, have you ever visited India ? If so , how was your experience.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...