Dravid Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 BDxRhcpBZio&feature=related If people still think he chucks......then they are mentally challenged. so he was born a chucker :hysterical: meh, got no prob with him.. though warne was def. the better spinner Link to comment
saneindian Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 Had Murali not broken Warne's record, there wouldn't have been as much of a debate on his action. Link to comment
Mamu Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 ^The point of these tests is to see if he can bowl all his different deliveries without chucking. Also, are you claiming his bending is more than 15 degrees, that is the the permissible limit ? You do the same to me and even I will pass. Put me on the field and the 1st bowl I will deliver will be a 'chuck'. So I am all good? How is the Lab Testing related to what is happening on the field ? Link to comment
Gunner_Mania Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 ^The point of these tests is to see if he can bowl all his different deliveries without chucking. Also, are you claiming his bending is more than 15 degrees, that is the the permissible limit ? It wasn't untill the controversy came along. It became permissible to accept the likes of Murali, Bhajji, Ajmal etc Link to comment
Gunner_Mania Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 You do the same to me and even I will pass. Put me on the field and the 1st bowl I will deliver will be a 'chuck'. So I am all good? How is the Lab Testing related to what is happening on the field ? The lab testing was to prove that what he was doing was not artificial but he had a natural problem with the way his hand was. The above video explains that clearly. Link to comment
Bradman99 Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Murali has more wickets, but I think Warne is the better bowler. Link to comment
yoda Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 ofc an aussie deserves the record more cause they are so fair and balanced just like Rupert Murdoc's fox news :hehe: Link to comment
Chorazin Reto Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 By the letter of the law he had an illegal action as spinners were only allowed 5deg of flex(which really is sweet fa) as compared to 7.5deg for medium pacers, and 10deg for phasht bowlers. The laws however were changed(2003/2004, around there) to allow 15deg flex for everyone, by the current letter of the law his action is now sound, correct? They were both great spinners of their era. Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Murali has more wickets' date=' but I think Warne is the better bowler.[/quote'] Yeah and Tendulkar has more runs but Ponting is better. And India are ranked number 1 but Australia are better! Link to comment
Lord Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Murali has more wickets' date=' but I think Warne is the better bowler.[/quote'] i agree Link to comment
King Tendulkar Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 i agree Murali has more wickets, more 5 wicket hauls, more 10 wicket hauls, better average and better strike rate. Murali also turned it more and turned it both ways. But yeah Warne was better:(( Link to comment
Lord Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Murali has more wickets' date=' more 5 wicket hauls, more 10 wicket hauls, better average and better strike rate. Murali also turned it more and turned it both ways. But yeah Warne was better:(([/quote'] ignore his performance against Ban n Zim n compare. anyway i prefere watching a good leggie than an offie:P Link to comment
DomainK Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 I would watch Warne over Murali any day. Warne will remain the better spinner for me. That however does not make me anti-Murali. Link to comment
Lord Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 I would watch Warne over Murali any day. Warne will remain the better spinner for me. That however does not make me anti-Murali. :dito: Link to comment
Ilarum Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 I have asked this question AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN --- I Will ask ONE MORE TIME How on the bloody earth the fact -- that just because he did not chuck with straps all around his body and wires through every porous hole on his body in a lab in a remote desert in Australia --- determine that he did not chuck Ball No 4 in Over No 23 in 3rd Test of say India vs Sri Lanka? How How How ? How How How ????? Can some sane person explain that to me? Chucking should be directly related to what the Bowler does On the FIELD! -- Not in a friggin Lab. To all the people who want to defend this act of Murali --- I have one more thing to say --- You Send me to Australia and Test -- whatever way you want -- I will pass the test and get a certificate -- "No MAMU did not Chuck -- He is a Legal Bowler" and in the 1st match after I am back, I will throw the ball that I am given to bowl. So this is all legal ? I am good bowler? It drives me insane -- all these Tests and Nonsense. Here, you can start by reading this instead of screaming in ignorance. If you want to know the truth, read this in full including the links provided and watch the videos. If you can't be bothered, I can only pity the ignorant people like you who don't have time to find out the truth but would just voice your opinion as facts. Link to comment
Ilarum Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 I tried to post the link but it says I need five posts. So will do once I have five Link to comment
Lord Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 OK so here is the link http://www.islandcricket.lk/blogs/hilal/77730096/riding-muralis-coattails-roy-bishop-muttiah-muralitharan-chucking welcome to ICF,bro.r u a Lankan.pls introduce yourself in introduction thread:icflove: Link to comment
achilles Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Didn't Mcgrath and Brett Lee have a close to 15 deg. or more action too? but they didn't play for the subcontinent now did they? :two_thumbs_up: I'd say that retard doesn't deserve to umpire' date=' ever.[/quote'] ofc an aussie deserves the record more cause they are so fair and balanced just like Rupert Murdoc's fox news :hehe: And with this quote, Emerson has said buh-bye to any remote chances of him becoming a part of the ICC Administration some day. Link to comment
Mr. Wicket Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 'Emerson doesn't deserve attention when he only comes up with such stupid sheet.' - Wicky Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now