No UDRS for Sri Lanka-India Tests

[The Outsider]

Actually I would have turned it down 9 times out of 10, if not 10 times :). That ball should not have got a wicket. But the key question though is whether there would be anybody who believes that that ball would have hit the inside of leg stump!

I do and it's pretty clear from just watching the replay how the ball was straightening. Now I know you are on an ill found crusade against Hawk Eye, so won't try to convince you, but since you asked.

[thevortex]

I do and it's pretty clear from just watching the replay how the ball was straightening. Now I know you are on an ill found crusade against Hawk Eye' date=' so won't try to convince you, but since you asked.[/quote'] Only two things wrong with that statement, Outsider. 'Ill found' and 'crusade'. :) That ball was not hitting the inside of the leg stump. The only way it would was if the laws of physics were bent to accommodate that of Hawkeye's and its fervent believers'!!

[thevortex]

I am not even going to ask you if you saw the point of release of Mishra and the point at the crease from where he delivered. And if you had watched that entire spell of Mishra - there were very very few balls that Mishra actually turned.