seedhi Posted October 24, 2010 Posted October 24, 2010 The correct analogy is that pakistan is a whoar used by the US. The US did impregnate pakistan's fertile womb of islamic radicalism with arms and money to produce the Talibani devil-child. Of course, US abandoned the whoar and the illegitimate Talibani child only to return when the grown up kid bit his dad's ass. The right thing to do now is to kill the child (Taliban) and neuter the whoar (pakistan).
CSK Fan Posted October 25, 2010 Posted October 25, 2010 If you care to read the wikileaks documents it will be clear to you that a huge majority of those deaths were caused by insurgent activities or by intra-Iraqi, Shia-Sunni conflict. The number 66000 is the civilian deaths that have been documented by the US forces, not killed by them. Does that matter? If not for the war, these deaths would not have happened. It was a huge cost to pay
yoda Posted October 25, 2010 Posted October 25, 2010 Does that matter? If not for the war' date=' [b']these deaths would not have happened. It was a huge cost to pay true, but different deaths ordered by Saddam and Chemical Al although I do agree with those who say it was none of US' business to go there in the first place.
CSK Fan Posted October 25, 2010 Posted October 25, 2010 true' date=' but different deaths ordered by Saddam and Chemical Al although I do agree with those who say it was none of US' business to go there in the first place.[/quote'] In the initial part after seizing power Saddam did that, but in the later years the country was very stable and also for a muslim countrym didn't harbour religious fanatics
seedhi Posted October 25, 2010 Posted October 25, 2010 Does that matter? If not for the war' date=' these deaths would not have happened. It was a huge cost to pay[/quote']Yes it does matter, you cant blame primary responsibility of deaths caused by insurgents killing people onto the US forces. If that is the logic to be followed what is there to stop someone from blaming that all the deaths in the last 20 years in Kashmir on the Indian army even though a huge majority of them were by terrorists?
Recommended Posts