Sid Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 yes my bad he was dropped at 22 or something.. but that really doesnt make much of a match winning difference does it? :P.. and well i cant say anything and neither can u abt akram not playing that particular match thats really absurd to accuse him of fearing the same batting line up which he has toppled so many times before.. but one fact is for sure' date=' when both these gentlemen had their chances akram shone for his team(1992 final) whereas sachin choked(2003 final).. :P[/quote'] Do you even knoiw the meaning of choking Computer Evil
satyam1729 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 yes my bad he was dropped at 22 or something.. but that really doesnt make much of a match winning difference does it? :P.. and well i cant say anything and neither can u abt akram not playing that particular match thats really absurd to accuse him of fearing the same batting line up which he has toppled so many times before.. but one fact is for sure' date=' when both these gentlemen had their chances akram shone for his team(1992 final) whereas sachin choked(2003 final).. :P[/quote'] What are you saying. Tendulkar won man of the match against Pakistan in 1992 and 2003 WC. Fact is Akram never performed against strong batting line up. Remember what hayden and Gilchrist did to him in 1999 and 2003 WC.:haha:
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 What are you saying. Tendulkar won man of the match against Pakistan in 1992 and 2003 WC. Fact is Akram never performed against strong batting line up. Remember what hayden and Gilchrist did to him in 1999 and 2003 WC.:haha: 1992 is waaaay old dude those conditions dont apply now.. i am not trying to avoid.. yea he may have gotten the award in 1992 courtesy of massive hammering but that time, conditions etc were different and so were the teams, players n their potentials.. and i think i didnt get ur hayden and gilchrist doing something to akram point cause as far as i remember akram got gilchrist in the v first over of both 99 n 03 world cup(except 99 final) and hayden was also sent by akram after only scoring a handful.. so wat do u mean here..? or have u totally flipped ur beans..? :P
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 and sachin getting man of the match in 03 match is the same as ross taylor against pak.. only courtesy of a missed chance by a fielder.. otherwise the bowler did his work well.. in sachin's case it was akram in 03..
satyam1729 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 1992 is waaaay old dude those conditions dont apply now.. i am not trying to avoid.. yea he may have gotten the award in 1992 courtesy of massive hammering but that time, conditions etc were different and so were the teams, players n their potentials.. and i think i didnt get ur hayden and gilchrist doing something to akram point cause as far as i remember akram got gilchrist in the v first over of both 99 n 03 world cup(except 99 final) and hayden was also sent by akram after only scoring a handful.. so wat do u mean here..? or have u totally flipped ur beans..? :P Go and check the scorecard . Akram was hit for 64 runs in 2003 WC and never bothered to bowl in 1999 WC final. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/43547.html?class=2;filter=advanced;opposition=6;template=results;trophy=12;type=bowling Averages 60 against India in WC. :haha::haha:
satyam1729 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 and sachin getting man of the match in 03 match is the same as ross taylor against pak.. only courtesy of a missed chance by a fielder.. otherwise the bowler did his work well.. in sachin's case it was akram in 03.. Go and watch the match. Razzaq was not at the right place. So it is the mistake of your captain and field placing. Also will you remove the wickets taken by Pakistani bowlers due to ball-tampering and drugs.
desi pride 1234 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 1992 is waaaay old dude those conditions dont apply now.. i am not trying to avoid.. yea he may have gotten the award in 1992 courtesy of massive hammering but that time, conditions etc were different and so were the teams, players n their potentials.. and i think i didnt get ur hayden and gilchrist doing something to akram point cause as far as i remember akram got gilchrist in the v first over of both 99 n 03 world cup(except 99 final) and hayden was also sent by akram after only scoring a handful.. so wat do u mean here..? or have u totally flipped ur beans..? :P 'symmo broke ur super phaaast bowler's back in 2003. waqar was so pissed off and bowled couple of beamers.:hysterical::hysterical:
Baad Indian Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Yeah but thats what cricket is all about , the contest is between bat and ball , it will be boring if a batsman or a bowler starts dominating from the word go . Chances are always there , Pakistan didnt took them and the opponents took it to there advantage . Taylor getting dropped takes away no credit from him it still takes huge effort for scoring 28 and 30 runs from Akhtar/Razzaq.
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Go and check the scorecard . Akram was hit for 64 runs in 2003 WC and never bothered to bowl in 1999 WC final. http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/43547.html?class=2;filter=advanced;opposition=6;template=results;trophy=12;type=bowling Averages 60 against India in WC. :haha::haha: isnt that only in 3 matches..? including the 03 one screwed up by razzaq..? grow out of it dude..:haha: btw exclude the wc query n then tell me the average.. can u..?:hysterical:
satyam1729 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 isnt that only in 3 matches..? including the 03 one screwed up by razzaq..? grow out of it dude..:haha: btw exclude the wc query n then tell me the average.. can u..?:hysterical: Here we are talking about WC dude . :haha::haha: So why exclude WC ?
Dhruv200 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 isnt that only in 3 matches..? including the 03 one screwed up by razzaq..? grow out of it dude..:haha: btw exclude the wc query n then tell me the average.. can u..?:hysterical: Y do u pakis lie and big up ur bowlers sachin was never dropped when he was on 8 he was dropped when the score was 59/2 or something shoaib intimidating sachin i heard pakis are very delusional but today u proved u r more stupid than delusional.
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 'symmo broke ur super phaaast bowler's back in 2003. waqar was so pissed off and bowled couple of beamers.:hysterical::hysterical: wrong.. he scored those off against spinners/medium pacers.. fast bowlers came in late to him.. anywayz paki or any other country's fast bowlers r not invincible there have been times when everyone got hammered.. n btw idk y u brought in symonds he's totally off topic right now..:idunno:
satyam1729 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 wrong.. he scored those off against spinners/medium pacers.. fast bowlers came in late to him.. anywayz paki or any other country's fast bowlers r not invincible there have been times when everyone got hammered.. n btw idk y u brought in symonds he's totally off topic right now..:idunno: http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/65238.html?view=pvp 70 runs were of fast bowling. :haha:
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Y do u pakis lie and big up ur bowlers sachin was never dropped when he was on 8 he was dropped when the score was 59/2 or something shoaib intimidating sachin i heard pakis are very delusional but today u proved u r more stupid than delusional. and ur blind before even coming up to the level of being stupid, delusional etc cause i already admited above to have mistaken him to be at 8 when he was dropped..
Dhruv200 Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 and ur blind before even coming up to the level of being stupid' date=' delusional etc cause i already admited above to have mistaken him to be at 8 when he was dropped..[/quote'] no u pakis like providing false information atleast stop living in disney land.
Asim Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 why only Sachin?nobody intimidated him.they just tonked him out of the park' date='e.g.Bhajji n recently Taylor[/quote'] :D honestly speaking these kind of posts actually ruins the ones which contains some amount of sense but once you guys start adding this type of stuff, genuine ones also start to look and sound funny...
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/65238.html?view=pvp 70 runs were of fast bowling. :haha: 51 runs were scored off against fast bowlers.. razzaq was never a genuine fast bowler.. i already pointed razzaq above with spinners..
Computer Angel Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 no u pakis like providing false information atleast stop living in disney land. it is u whos delusional who thinks sachin scored that knock on his own.. :D
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now