King Tendulkar Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 To me it looks a belter to bat on. It also has short boundaries in some areas, uppercuts will fly for 6. To me a par score on this is 290. So if we are chasing 260-270 should be ok, only the fact its WC final and presuure is enormous is the thing!
Ram Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 Agree with the OP. We've had such dodgy batting tracks all throughout the tournament, we cant tell a good batting track from a bad one. J'dene has scored 65 at a run a ball without twitching a ball. Lots of runs have been scored behind the wicket, which is a sign that the wicket has lots of pace and bounce, which makes it easier for batting.
King Tendulkar Posted April 2, 2011 Author Posted April 2, 2011 Agree with the OP. We've had such dodgy batting tracks all throughout the tournament' date=' we cant tell a good batting track from a bad one. J'dene has scored 65 at a run a ball without twitching a ball. Lots of runs have been scored behind the wicket, which is a sign that the wicket has lots of pace and bounce, which makes it easier for batting.[/quote'] Also sanga when batting with jaya at one point were cruising with track seemingly impotent. If it was normal oid I would fancy us to chase 300. But scorebrad pressure and WC final pressure makes it more tricky then normal
Ranjha Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 260-280 is par BUT ITS ABOUT THE PRESSURE OF CHASING IN WC FINAL. You can throw par scores out of the window here.
King Tendulkar Posted April 2, 2011 Author Posted April 2, 2011 Good news I think SL are under par. Track looks a belter. lets hope pressure does not do us.
ZodiaC Posted April 2, 2011 Posted April 2, 2011 300 was par imo. Especially considering our batting lineup.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now