Tendulkar's Hundreds Win More Games

[1983-2011]

[Sid]

Wow there will be some serious discussion here

[panesarv]

Nice! We should pull up statistics of other good players to see how their scoring affects their team!

[Sachin=GOD]

Is there any need to tell this obvious fact :dontknow:

[Cricket Tragic]

Yeah, we know that.

[yoda]

This whole obsession with 100s is baffling. How is a 98 different from a 100 in terms of it's value to the team's win? It is an arbitrary number as far as I am concerned. A feel good milestone yes, but beyond that, it is meaningless.

[Dhruv200]

Sachin haters they are everywhere because they only started watching cricket since yesterday.

[Dhruv200]

The greatest batsman of all time i dont care what people think SRT is the baap of the cricket.

[jonas10]

Yah in dont lose 75% of the time when SRT hits 100.... Compare that to the propaganda machine that thinks India loses 75% of the time he hits a 100 :giggle:

[Sachinism]

Why didn't you include his IPL stats? 100% losing record CHOKER

[akshayxyz]

This whole obsession with 100s is baffling. How is a 98 different from a 100 in terms of it's value to the team's win? It is an arbitrary number as far as I am concerned. A feel good milestone yes' date= but beyond that, it is meaningless.

+1000000000000 I am surprised how come no one brings this up and people keep fapping over # of 100s, 50s and what not.

[CSK Fan]

Does that mean someone is going to be fired from Microsoft for fudging data?

[Sachin=GOD]

^:hysterical:

[vaibhav_delhi]

Nice, poor fans now have to include 100s including Vs the minnows n paste it on a cool poster to feel good after sachin's Ipl hundred. If I am not wrong it was the 1st time ever in IPL when someone scored a 100 n the team still lost.:giggle:

This whole obsession with 100s is baffling. How is a 98 different from a 100 in terms of it's value to the team's win? It is an arbitrary number as far as I am concerned. A feel good milestone yes' date=' but beyond that, it is meaningless.[/quote'] good question yoda, a couple of points: 1. In an ideal world, there shouldn't be much difference between a 98 n a 100. But in reality, a 100 is a milestone n has a bearing on how the fans react And how other players think abt it n play. 2. We are talking abt 100+ scores which could be substantially more than 98.

[Sid]

I see potential in this thread now

[CSK Fan]

1. In an ideal world' date=' there shouldn't be much difference between a 98 n a 100. But in reality, a 100 is a milestone n has a bearing on how the fans react [b']And how other players think abt it n play. 2. We are talking abt 100+ scores which could be substantially more than 98.

Obviously you havent played cricket at any level. And to accuse players at the top most level to be affected by someone's 100 is retarded

[Sachin=GOD]

Guys please don't feed the troll :--D

[vaibhav_delhi]

Does that mean someone is going to be fired from Microsoft for fudging data?

jitne muh utni baatain.:giggle: someone needs to relook the meaning of 'fudging data' bro.:giggle: 20 Tons Vs non-minnows since yr 2000. (not counting no-result matches or the IPL Ton). Only 11 wins. Team not able to win in last 3 tons. you had said tht Aus n SA are stronger teams n a Ton shouldn't give more than 55% wins (I dint agree )....but the win record is even worse if you exclude these 2 teams as I had shown.

[vaibhav_delhi]

And to accuse players at the top most level to be affected by someone's 100 is retarded

Thats only in sachin's case (due to his aura)....have already given the reasons for it, in the other thread...

[ganeshran]

Thats only in sachin's case (due to his aura)....have already given the reasons for it' date=' in the other thread...[/quote'] So Sachin's aura magically affects other players when he scores a 100 and doesnt affect others when he scores a 98? :hmmmm2: Must be some aura which is triggered by that one run between 99 and 100. Me thinks India TV should do a investigative report on this phenomenon.