Stuge Posted May 9, 2011 Posted May 9, 2011 Calling it a strange and surprising order, the Supreme Court on Monday stayed the Allahabad high court's verdict on the Babri Masjid-Ramjanmbhoomi disputed site by which it had directed the site be divided equally between the three contending parties. Assailing the judgment of the Lucknow bench of t he Allahabad high court, the apex court bench of justice Aftab Alam and justice RM Lodha Monday said that by directing the partition of the disputed site, the high court has given an entirely new dimension to the case. "It is a rare judgement whose operation has to be stayed," the court said. "It was a strange and surprising order that was not prayed for by any of the parties and cannot be allowed to remain," it said. While admitting the appeals by all the parties, the court said that "status quo as a disputed site will remain as directed by the constitution bench of the apex court by its verdict of Jan 7 1993 and that of March 13-14, 2002". While ordering the stay, the apex court bench of justice Alam and justice Lodha said that at least on the issue of the staying the operation of the high court verdict, there is a unanimity. The apex court had allowed worship at the makeshift temple at Ayodhya and restrained all the parties from carrying out any religious activities on the 67.703 acres of land that was acquired by the central government around the disputed site. The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad high court on Sep 30, 2010, ruled that the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya was built on a site after demolishing a temple on it way back in 1528, and that the spot where a makeshift temple to Ram Lalla was built after razing the mosque in 1992 was indeed where Hindu god Ram was born. The Lucknow bench ordered that the land around the disputed site would be divided into three parts -- one for Hindus, another for Muslims and the third for Nirmohi Akhara, a Hindu sect and an original litigant in the case. http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/newdelhi/SC-stays-strange-HC-order-on-splitting-Ayodhya-land/Article1-695262.aspx
Stuge Posted May 9, 2011 Author Posted May 9, 2011 oh mother earth . .. Can we bury this issue ? or Do we want more blood shed in the country .The whole world is on the verge of war because of terrorism (that too comes because of blind faith in ones religion. :facepalm:
ganeshran Posted May 9, 2011 Posted May 9, 2011 Adjourn the case and we will deal with it 10 years later :orderorder:
Sachin=GOD Posted May 9, 2011 Posted May 9, 2011 :asleep: :asleep: Long way to go before this is settled.
ganeshran Posted May 9, 2011 Posted May 9, 2011 Its good.. mindless to have some definite judgement and let it be a precursor for communal trouble. Better to deal with it after 10 years
The Outsider Posted May 10, 2011 Posted May 10, 2011 only one party was not happy with the ruling. Is that why every party appealed? :hysterical:
ganeshran Posted May 10, 2011 Posted May 10, 2011 Sometimes inaction is better than trying to solve the problem
Sachin=GOD Posted May 10, 2011 Posted May 10, 2011 ^Not in this case. As long as this case remains open, various political organizations will try to garner political leverage out of it. The sooner this case is decided the better it will be for this country and for both communities.
ganeshran Posted May 10, 2011 Posted May 10, 2011 ^Not in this case. As long as this case remains open' date=' various political organizations will try to garner political leverage out of it. The sooner this case is decided the better it will be for this country and for both communities.[/quote'] They can only get political mileage out of a burning issue like when a definitive judgement is given. They cant make people rally around a case lying in cold storage..
Guest Shivani Posted May 10, 2011 Posted May 10, 2011 New Delhi SC ? Theres only one SC and thats in New Delhi.. :D
ganeshran Posted May 10, 2011 Posted May 10, 2011 New Delhi SC ? Theres only one SC and thats in New Delhi.. :D :hysterical: Regionalism by Stuge :protest: :protest:
Stuge Posted May 10, 2011 Author Posted May 10, 2011 :hysterical: Regionalism by Stuge :protest: :protest: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Recommended Posts