jairamesh Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 Why did the PCB decide to play the tests in Dubai/AD? The wickets are so damn flat that it makes for such **** cricket, it is more expensive and negates their bowling attack. I guess having one 'home' venue might have been the reason but SL were happy to host them iirc. SL would not have been a bad option since the likes of Ajmal could have been useful and it's also marginally better for the seamers (and occasionally pretty good). exactly, saves them embarrassment of being trounced on proper wicket. At least in uae, the pancakes will assist to ekk out a draw, like the one against SA.
Cricket Tragic Posted June 29, 2011 Posted June 29, 2011 That's big one' date=' should decide who finally deserves to be called no. 1. If England wants to be considered the best, they have to prove themselves and finally win in India. Even a 1-0 series would do, though laughable they will achieve that.[/quote'] England winning in India? They haven't got a chance (we've lost what 2 series in 14 years?). We might have 1/2 retirements by then so we have to see how everything works out but the current full-strength team would beat England 2-0 or 3-0 at home imo.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now