Magneto Posted April 17, 2012 Author Posted April 17, 2012 :hatsoff: to ABDV for the amazing scoop :hatsoff: to Gayle for those 5 sixes :hatsoff: to Tiwary for the final 6 :hatsoff: to Dinda for superb bowling :finger: to Nehra and get lost :mad: :mad:
Magneto Posted April 17, 2012 Author Posted April 17, 2012 :whine: why..why...whyyyyyyyyyy Kyon ki hamare paas Nehra hai bhai :giggle:
Sir john Posted April 17, 2012 Posted April 17, 2012 "@AltCricket: Marlon Samuels 2-0-5-1. Ashish Nehra 4-0-54-1. Pune deserved to lose, purely for that awful decision. #IPL"
Late Cut Posted April 17, 2012 Posted April 17, 2012 Yes it was Jesse's call but Dada hesitated and a split second hesitation makes all the difference It looked preplanned. Dada and his awesome dada like strike rate and all...:giggle:
yoda Posted April 17, 2012 Posted April 17, 2012 Was Samuels called for chucking again? If not, Saurav is just plain dumb.
Zelig Posted April 17, 2012 Posted April 17, 2012 Was Samuels called for chucking again? If not' date=' Saurav is just plain dumb.[/quote'] The latter :agree:
Magneto Posted April 17, 2012 Author Posted April 17, 2012 Couldn't have given the last over to Samuels still :headshake:
yoda Posted April 17, 2012 Posted April 17, 2012 The latter :agree: I remember that even during WC 2003 finals, Srinath got to finish his full quota of 10 overs for 80+ runs when part timers like Sehwag had bowled quite economically for around 5 RPO and still had overs left.
yoda Posted April 17, 2012 Posted April 17, 2012 Couldn't have given the last over to Samuels still :headshake: Why not?
Magneto Posted April 17, 2012 Author Posted April 17, 2012 Was Samuels called for chucking again? If not' date=' Saurav is just plain dumb.[/quote'] If Samuels would have got murdered like Rahul Sharma, you would have still blamed Gangs :headshake: If Nehra cannot defend 21 in one over, no one can do anything.
Needforspeed Posted April 17, 2012 Posted April 17, 2012 Nehra was the most experienced bowler. Its easy to be wise after the event. Samuels is not a regular bowler, and what if he had got hit too.
yoda Posted April 17, 2012 Posted April 17, 2012 If Samuels would have got murdered like Rahul Sharma, you would have still blamed Gangs :headshake: If Nehra cannot defend 21 in one over, no one can do anything. That I agree with. He could have at least bowled Samuel his quota given that he was going at a deadly RPO, not necessarily the last over.
Magneto Posted April 17, 2012 Author Posted April 17, 2012 Why not? Nehra had gotten Gayle's wicket in the last over, had bowled two dots and was in rhythm. Samuels had bowled some 10 overs before
Magneto Posted April 17, 2012 Author Posted April 17, 2012 That I agree with. He could have at least bowled Samuel his quota given that he was going at a deadly RPO' date=' not necessarily the last over.[/quote'] But the rest - Matthews and Kumar bowled well too. Samuels could have been taken apart by Gayle the way he took Rahul Sharma apart.
Needforspeed Posted April 17, 2012 Posted April 17, 2012 Look guys..It was anybody's game till the last ball. Just hard luck.
Zelig Posted April 17, 2012 Posted April 17, 2012 Samuels should of been brought for Mathews (18th over?) who went for a few. And, no Rahul Sharma and Samuels are two different types of bowlers. :zelig:
Recommended Posts