ICC considers different target adjuster from Duckworth-Lewis method

[asterix]

Andy Wilson guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 29 May 2012 17.01 BST There could be no more symbolic example of India's challenge to surpass England in every aspect of cricket's world order. Now they are even seeking to overturn the Duckworth-Lewis method, the Lancastrian system of determining the result of matches in which rain stops play. http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012/may/29/icc-duckworth-lewis-method

:hatsoff: to VJD... :finger: to Andy Wilson

[Crookbond]

The challenge for the ICC, and indeed the cricket public, is to go beyond nationalistic rivalries, judge the stringency of two complex systems and calculate the benefits they can bring to the game. There are differences and a few can be outlined in laymen's terms.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci-icc/content/current/story/566696.html

[superstar]

Lol Andy wilson and david hopps. Idiots living in the victorian era. No one other than these two would have thought about this as a power play btw BCCI and ECB. D/L is horrible and is totally irrelevant in T20. When it has been added to T20's it adds 0-10 runs. In 50 over match it is too unfair, especially if there are multiple interruptions.

[superstar]

Also what is this . "In its place, he proposes the alternative that he has worked on tirelessly for the past 15 years - the VJD method. VJD, to British minds at least, sounds disturbingly like the return of Mad Cow Disease" From when did cricinfo allow people to insult others based on their names.

[Crookbond]

:facepalm: It was just humor, you may have taken it too seriously.