Jump to content

left duplicity and its brazen pro-china stand


Guest dada_rocks

Recommended Posts

Guest dada_rocks
its not about alibis but about hard facts. lets not forget the role played by Nehru in the whole issue' date=' and the fact that in the last years of his rule [and subsequent Congress [i']sarkars] the CPI supported Congress at the centre and made it possible for them to form govt. and the night is day, horses lay eggs... ... ...
nice face-saving explanation there :hysterical:, fact remains these thugs have broken ways recently .. and that story of 1000 enginners of china being forced down india' throat didn;t happen by maosit or in 60's it's pretty much recent news
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest dada_rocks
:haha::haha: So much for your politics credibility ! the (M) in CPI(M) stands for Marxist, not Maoist. Even class 6 students know this.
Maoist Marxist does it make any difference.. explain the event of these thugs getting elected and reelected.. despite giving calls like that.. . and yes these thugs have broken ways recently otherwise they were prt of big consortium workign in tandem and look for what they have done through forcing 1000 chinese engineers... then that will be talking sense and given ur track record it's too much to ask..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maoist Marxist does it make any difference
HIndu or Daoist- does it make any difference ? American or British - does it make any difference ? If you KNEW what you chatted nonsense about, you'd know there is a significant difference between Maoism and Marxism.
then that will be talking sense and given ur track record it's too much to ask..
And given your track record, you most definitely will not admit to the error when you said : in fact in CPI(M) M stands for maoist. It is not a fact, infact it is categorically false. If that is too much mirchee for your *****, i am truely sorry. But fact remains- what you called fact is not a fact but your retardation. Can you admit that or are you too juvenile to see your error ?
explain the event of these thugs getting elected and reelected.. despite giving calls like that.
These thugs have a very consolidated base amongst the rural community and Indians in general are more sensible than you - they vote for parties who affect their stomachs positively first, meaningless soundbytes later.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest dada_rocks
HIndu or Daoist- does it make any difference ? American or British - does it make any difference ? If you KNEW what you chatted nonsense about, you'd know there is a significant difference between Maoism and Marxism. And given your track record, you most definitely will not admit to the error when you said : in fact in CPI(M) M stands for maoist. It is not a fact, infact it is categorically false. If that is too much mirchee for your *****, i am truely sorry. But fact remains- what you called fact is not a fact but your retardation. Can you admit that or are you too juvenile to see your error ? These thugs have a very consolidated base amongst the rural community and Indians in general are more sensible than you - they vote for parties who affect their stomachs positively first, meaningless soundbytes later.
again u screw up with analogy don't try ur hands at anythign logical mujhse poochh liya karo .. Mao was marx follower so if u must put religion analogy put in terms of hindusim and let us say swami narayan group.. it's not error mian it's case ofquoting a follower instead of the main culrpit.. these are facts Communaiss in those days were one consortium recent fallout with maoist notwithstanding.. foget then even today theseCPI(M) thugs force their way where despite scores of engineers remaining unemployed we have to import chinese engineers........ and when these morons are asked had u done the ame in case of american engineers they obfuscate matter.. and thugs like these get elected again and again and again it has todo with some sick psyche .. period u can weave ,illion alibis in their defence but that's nto going to chage the bottomline
Link to comment
Share on other sites

again u screw up with analogy don't try ur hands at anythign logical mujhse poochh liya karo ..
The analogies are perfectly fine, you are the one who isnt aware of the difference between marxism, leninism, stallinism, maoism or socialism. As for pooch liya karo- sorry but you are not qualified or smart enough to dictate to me about logic.
Mao was marx follower so if u must put religion analogy put in terms of hindusim and let us say swami narayan group..
Sorry but YOUR analogy is the flawed one. Mao wasnt just a follower of Marx, he thought marx had a lot of good ideas - he followed a lot of Marx but also modified Marxism to suit his purpose. To my knowledge, Swaminarayan group doesnt go around modifying the Gita to suit their perspective.
it's not error mian it's case ofquoting a follower instead of the main culrpit..
It is an error, because you said that the (M) stands for maoist- it is false, M doesnt stand for maoist, it stands for Marxist. Ie, what you claimed as a fact is false ( M is not for Maoist). Have some self-respect to admit your error when it is pointed out to you.
illion alibis in their defence but that's nto going to chage the bottomline
There was no defence from me, retard. I pointed out one of the main REASON why CPM has a continuous vote base- they fack over everyone else BUT the landless poor rural folks- who happen to make up the biggest voting sector. Then i pointed out your error when you claimed M stands for Maoist, when it stands for Marxist. There was no defence- but a two-bit 'if you arnt with us, you are with them' style thinker will clearly struggle with such a basic concept.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mean to take the piss out of anyone but the two foot in the mouth incidents that stick out for me are- Sandy's CPI(M) and CC's RSS Although CC's was funnier :two_thumbs_up: Sabh se galti hoti hai kabhi na kabhi. Tum loge ek dusre ka ghanta bajate rahoge:D You all can't be perfect and faultless like me :hysterical: I hope you both still love me though:eyedance: Sandy you should not get so senti about what CC says regarding Kali or her followers. He is entitled to his opinion. CC you on the other hand really loose it sometimes and start calling people names. So everyone needs to take this pillChill-Pill.png If you guys still act like kids then I will have to start issuing *****slap.gifhttp://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlLA/original/*****-slap_1130536521.jpg :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::finger::finger::finger::heart::heart::heart::two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nice face-saving explanation there :hysterical:, fact remains these thugs have broken ways recently ..
CC, I accept your analysis of DR. Guy needs serious medical attention.
and that story of 1000 enginners of china being forced down india' throat didn;t happen by maosit or in 60's it's pretty much recent news
yeah... that's quite a story! try finding a few more.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok in fairness the difference between Mao and Marx is less than the difference between "RSS feed" and "Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh". I would say it's a draw in that regard. Apologist /commy corner Vs Chaddi walla corner ---> 1:1 Round three ding ding ding :hysterical::rose:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok in fairness the difference between Mao and Marx is less than the difference between "RSS feed" and "Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh".
False. Try more like the difference between Jains and Buddhists. For starters, the fundamental difference between marxism and maoism is that marxism gears the whole economy through collectivized farm outlets and makes farming the backbone of the economy, while maoism is about corporate-style companies run by the communist party (ie, a capitalist but a monopolist economic theory). For two, the issue of rights is fundamentally different in Maoism and Marxism- in Maoism, common populace CANNOT challenge the party heirarchy without going through the party system. In Marxism, the common populace can ALWAYS challenge anything central if it is perceived as despotism of the plutocracy. There is a huge difference between Maoism, Stallinism, Leninism, Trotskyism, Marxism and Socialism. It is like comparing the American president to the Indian president but the hinduvta fanatic right-brigade is usually clueless on most issues.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest dada_rocks

pahle isi enginner wali storty ka to explanation dhunh lo banki to baad mein aayegi.. bong communazis put china before india that remains a fact.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...