sandtest Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 CC1981 --- I am not among those who get easily provoked by personal remarks like Spymaster, James Bond etc. I made it very clear that you are IGNORED on this important issue related with national security for obvious reason, you have laymans understanding about intelligence agencies and how PRC operates. If you are really sincere in learning something about geo-strategic issues catch hold of some scholarly written views by ex-Indian intelligence and millitary chiefs on how PRC operates in India and then come back. Till then replying your usual BS is waste of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dada_rocks Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 People , ignorant or otherwise, with indifferent atittude towards indian issues are waste of time anyway.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CC1981 Posted September 4, 2007 Share Posted September 4, 2007 you have laymans understanding about intelligence agencies and how PRC operates.And you clearly have an understanding that surpasses that of the CID/RAW from your own statements. It is easy to tell who is the deluded one here. If you are really sincere in learning something about geo-strategic issues catch hold of some scholarly written views by ex-Indian intelligence and millitary chiefs on how PRC operates in India and then come back.Please tell me who have critiqued this so-called scholarly opinion first to determine how centered this opinion is and not presenting just one side of the story. But then again, your two-bit novellist that you call geo-strategic thinkers surely have some amazing sources, since they are leading you to conclusions that RAW/CID have no inkling about ( such as you knowing about the nature of chinese control of CPM in India and yet RAW not having a clue). Bottomline is, you are simply talking out of your ar$e, simply because you are taking the 'path of least resistance' rather than path of factuality to support your commie-to-china control links. If you want to know why the commies are unhappy, it is simple and far removed form your chest-thumping 'china oh nooo' paranoia: The other 3 members of the 4 club are US,Japan and Australia. Three very capitalistic nations (Japan lesser of the three but still) and commies mortally fear close ties with capitalist nations when they are not calling the shots. That is the bottomline. It doesnt matter one whit whether China is commie, capitalist, dictatorship or radioactive wasteland- neither does it matter what Russia is or Nepal is etc- as long as commie parties exist in India, they will do everything in their power to try and stop India cozying up with ANY capitalist giant. That is their nature. The China part is nothing but your nationalism spilling over in this issue in the most baseless of ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 ^ And under what category would you place the Scandinavian countries, Mr. sarchasm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 if not capitalist US style then socialist? bravo!! It's called a Social Democracy FYI, and IMO it is the best system humanity has invented till date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Outsider Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 brings a smile on my face. Anything which makes you smile. That's our motto!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 16, 2007 Share Posted December 16, 2007 those socail democracy idelogical parasite sort of village-states won't survive without sucking blood out of huge capitalist democracy.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maggot_brain Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 It's called a Social Democracy FYI' date=' and IMO it is the best system humanity has invented till date.[/quote'] You are correct it is called Social Democracy. I don't care much for your opinion regarding it as the best system humanity has invented to date though. Social Democracy was comprehensively discredited in 1914 when most members of The Second International rushed to declare their support for the Imperialist First World War. Further to this Bernstein's and Kautsky's approach was given a reality check when Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in 1933. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts