Magneto Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 thats what I did : Pujara opener,ABDV death over specialists,Rampaul is in decent form so got him will be purchasing later for next game too. Abey, death over bowlers not batsmen. ABDV may score 25 in 8 balls and still give u losses. Picking No.5 and 6s will usually be a loss. (unless they are keepers or allrounders) Even if Rampaul gets 4-0-25-2, he'll still be a loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidhoni Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Gaurav - Can we have some bonus for S/R as well like we have for economy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Abey, death over bowlers not batsmen. ABDV may score 25 in 8 balls and still give u losses. Picking No.5 and 6s will usually be a loss. Rampaul is death over bowler then:dance: ABDV generally comes in early enough but there should be something for SR :protest: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Abey, death over bowlers not batsmen. ABDV may score 25 in 8 balls and still give u losses. Picking No.5 and 6s will usually be a loss. Even if Rampaul gets 4-0-25-2, he'll still be a loss. how he'll over 19 then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Gaurav - Can we have some bonus for S/R as well like we have for economy? yeah thats is a must Pollard bashed the bowling yesterday but still only got 56 points:(( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin=GOD Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Rampaul is death over bowler then:dance: ABDV generally comes in early enough but there should be something for SR :protest: yeah. Gaurav plz add a range of points for strike rates :protest: :protest: you can do it like this: less than 80 : -10 80-100 : -5 100-130 : +5 130 : 175 : +10 175 - 225 : +15 225 - 250 : +20 more than 250 : +25 p.s. you can also put a condition like - to get points on strike rates of over 175, the batsman would have had to face at least 10 balls. :--D:--D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magneto Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 how he'll over 19 then On a patta I would say don't buy any bowlers. :headshake: You'll only be lucky to get a par. On the other hand, if you buy all 8 Top batsmen (1-4) from both teams, you'll land up with a profit anyway. :agree: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 On a patta I would say don't buy any bowlers. :headshake: You'll only be lucky to get a par. On the other hand, if you buy all 8 Top batsmen (1-4) from both teams, you'll land up with a profit anyway. :agree: but KXIP batting is weak,so Rampaul can get wickets on patta too :agree: prices of Kohli and Moses are too high otherwise I'd have bought them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaurav92 Posted May 14, 2013 Author Share Posted May 14, 2013 Gaurav - Can we have some bonus for S/R as well like we have for economy? yeah thats is a must Pollard bashed the bowling yesterday but still only got 56 points:(( No, I will give you all an example. Suppose I keep S/R bonus as follows :- 0-50 - -20 51-100 - -10 101-120 - -5 120-150 - 5 151-200 - 10 200+ - 20 And a player comes with last ball, and scores a 4 off the edge, his total points would be 4+20(for S/R) which will be definitely overvalued. And similarly, it a batsman on a juggler pitch scores 35 off 35, a good knock will just get 25 points (negative points for S/R). Also if I start rewarding bonus points for SR, the value of shares that I quote will also increase, for e.g Gayle will not only score runs, but score them quickly too, so I will value him higher, and in case somebody picks him up, will lose massively if he doesn't score. Now, the other option you would say is, take minimum number of balls as a base and then decide on the strike rate parameter (Say 10 balls). But the fact of the matter is that the valuation will become that much more difficult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magneto Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 but KXIP batting is weak,so Rampaul can get wickets on patta too :agree: prices of Kohli and Moses are too high otherwise I'd have bought them No Rat :beee: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidhoni Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 yeah. Gaurav plz add a range of points for strike rates :protest: :protest: you can do it like this: less than 80 : -10 80-100 : -5 100-130 : +5 130 : 175 : +10 175 - 225 : +15 225 - 250 : +20 more than 250 : +25 p.s. you can also put a condition like - to get points on strike rates of over 175, the batsman would have had to face at least 10 balls. :--D:--D I'd suggest : Less than 80 : -15 80-100 : -10 100-110 : 0 110-120 : 5 120-150 : 10 150-175 : 15 175-200 : 20 200+ : 25 And that 10 ball condition should apply to all and not just 175+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidhoni Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 No, I will give you all an example. Suppose I keep S/R bonus as follows :- 0-50 - -20 51-100 - -10 101-120 - -5 120-150 - 5 151-200 - 10 200+ - 20 And a player comes with last ball, and scores a 4 off the edge, his total points would be 4+20(for S/R) which will be definitely overvalued. And similarly, it a batsman on a juggler pitch scores 35 off 35, a good knock will just get 25 points (negative points for S/R). Also if I start rewarding bonus points for SR, the value of shares that I quote will also increase, for e.g Gayle will not only score runs, but score them quickly too, so I will value him higher, and in case somebody picks him up, will lose massively if he doesn't score. Now, the other option you would say is, take minimum number of balls as a base and then decide on the strike rate parameter (Say 10 balls).But the fact of the matter is that the valuation will become that much more difficult. Can we help? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin=GOD Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I'd suggest : Less than 80 : -15 80-100 : -10 100-110 : 0 110-120 : 5 120-150 : 10 150-175 : 15 175-200 : 20 200+ : 25 And that 10 ball condition should apply to all and not just 175+ thats even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 No, I will give you all an example. Suppose I keep S/R bonus as follows :- 0-50 - -20 51-100 - -10 101-120 - -5 120-150 - 5 151-200 - 10 200+ - 20 And a player comes with last ball, and scores a 4 off the edge, his total points would be 4+20(for S/R) which will be definitely overvalued. And similarly, it a batsman on a juggler pitch scores 35 off 35, a good knock will just get 25 points (negative points for S/R). Also if I start rewarding bonus points for SR, the value of shares that I quote will also increase, for e.g Gayle will not only score runs, but score them quickly too, so I will value him higher, and in case somebody picks him up, will lose massively if he doesn't score. Now, the other option you would say is, take minimum number of balls as a base and then decide on the strike rate parameter (Say 10 balls). But the fact of the matter is that the valuation will become that much more difficult. arrey keep lesser categories if you want.also I can help if you want:icflove: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaurav92 Posted May 14, 2013 Author Share Posted May 14, 2013 I'd suggest : Less than 80 : -15 80-100 : -10 100-110 : 0 110-120 : 5 120-150 : 10 150-175 : 15 175-200 : 20 200+ : 25 And that 10 ball condition should apply to all and not just 175+ No way buddy. Look, I want a bonus table that strikes a balance between low SR and High SR. If you add the table points there, it would come to +50 which is highly in favour of the players(stock holders). The sum should be 0 as in the table that I set up. If you all want SR Points, I can keep my table and add the minimum 10 balls condition to it? But then again, good players will be overpriced and if they fail to perform, losses will be made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 No way buddy. Look, I want a bonus table that strikes a balance between low SR and High SR. If you add the table points there, it would come to +50 which is highly in favour of the players(stock holders). The sum should be 0 as in the table that I set up. If you all want SR Points, I can keep my table and add the minimum 10 balls condition to it? But then again, good players will be overpriced and if they fail to perform, losses will be made. yeah do it.more the risk more the fun.players like Gayle n Pollard should anyway be priced high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin=GOD Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 No way buddy. Look' date=' I want a bonus table that strikes a balance between low SR and High SR. If you add the table points there, it would come to +50 which is highly in favour of the players(stock holders). [b']The sum should be 0 as in the table that I set up. If you all want SR Points, I can keep my table and add the minimum 10 balls condition to it? But then again, good players will be overpriced and if they fail to perform, losses will be made. fair enough. As for the risk part, well that should be okay with everyone because if there is a risk of losing then there's also a very good chance of a profit in case of good S/R (which happens often in t20) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidhoni Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 What about this Gaurav? Less than 80 : -25 80-90 : -20 90-100 : -15 100-110 : -10 110-120 : 0 120-150 : 10 150-175 : 15 175-200 : 20 200+ : 25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sachin=GOD Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 What about this Gaurav? Less than 80 : -25 80-90 : -20 90-100 : -15 100-110 : -10 110-120 : 0 120-150 : 10 150-175 : 15 175-200 : 20 200+ : 25 IMO g92's table is better bcoz it also takes into account S/R of 0-50 for which the batsman should be penalized the most. Anything over 80 should not be penalized with more than -10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 IMO g92's table is better bcoz it also takes into account S/R of 0-50 for which the batsman should be penalized the most. Anything over 80 should not be penalized with more than -10. yeah I agree.also lesser categories so lesser work for him:icflove: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts