Guest HariSampath Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 I say that Bradman, had he tored India, would have got 600 runs in a series, can you refute it ? Link to comment
Guest HariSampath Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 At least you must define what your criteria is for being considered a success in India, a point you have miserably failed to do on 3 threads Link to comment
Anakin Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 I say that Bradman' date=' had he tored India, would have got 600 runs in a series, can you refute it ?[/quote']:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: He was an amateur, a very good one. Even he knew it. Saw a dvd long time back where he himself said they were amateur cricketers in those days. Link to comment
Guest HariSampath Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: He was an amateur, a very good one. Even he knew it. Saw a dvd long time back where he himself said they were amateur cricketers in those days. After seeing the "professionals" of today on Tv, I will take that "amateur" on dvd, everytime :giggle: Link to comment
Anakin Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 After seeing the "professionals" of today on Tv' date=' I will take that "amateur" on dvd, everytime :giggle:[/quote']Of course you would, why else would you be a self-loathing dude Link to comment
Lurker Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 Sorry. Dont think your intentions are honest. kindly excuse me ... and find someone else that can indulge in a slanging match with you ... it shouldnt be hard to find such a poster. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: intentions..honest :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Looks like you had a slam dunk here Hari. Link to comment
Guest HariSampath Posted October 11, 2007 Share Posted October 11, 2007 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: intentions..honest :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: Looks like you had a slam dunk here Hari. The best part of the entire discussion on Bradman was that bheem started out trying to show Bradman was a hype, and ended up finally having a hard time in struggling establish thru convoluted logic that Bradman could not have been certainly expected to score a 300 in India in 1948 alone The very benchmark being a furious unwillingness to concede the gap between a 200 and a 300, shows what we were trying to tell him , and he realised it and scooted the debate :D Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now