Captain of Bhangra Posted October 12, 2007 Posted October 12, 2007 Before this Test, he averaged 50.07. He finished on 49.something. I think this means that Miandad is the only retired Pakistani cricketer to have a 50+ average...
theguyinallblue Posted October 12, 2007 Posted October 12, 2007 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:....This is new thing.... Inzi was crying to play in world XI... MP..why not consider those decisions as NOT OUT in which inzi was given out wrongly... i am sure he will avg 60 + when you would take that into account.
kablooee87 Posted October 12, 2007 Posted October 12, 2007 It's not that big a deal. Missing out on a 50 average by 0.14 (or whatever it is) doesn't say much about hsi career. It just means he retired at the right time.
Dravid Posted October 12, 2007 Posted October 12, 2007 i bet on paki forums, bradman comparisons will start :hahaha::hysterical:
kablooee87 Posted October 12, 2007 Posted October 12, 2007 i bet on paki forums' date=' bradman comparisons will start :hahaha::hysterical:[/quote'] The comparison is valid in terms of screwing it up right at the end. Nobody is comparing the two is batting ability/stats. PS. The only place so far where I've seen the Bradman ending comparison made is cricinfo.
The Outsider Posted October 12, 2007 Posted October 12, 2007 Not that it really matters in the end and an average of 49.xx is still pretty damn good and 50 is just a number, but to bring in the "playing for Pakistan" reason is a bit laughable considering how Inzamam was willing to give his arm, leg, and bit more to play in the Super Series Test.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now