StriKe Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Press Trust of India @PTI_News · 4m 4 minutes ago Cricket must be played in its true spirit and should remain a gentleman's game: SC to BCCI. If you allow these things to happen, then you are killing the game of cricket, SC to BCCI on IPL spot fixing scandal. We take the findings of Justice Mudgal Committee's report as gospel truth: BCCI tells SC. Benefit of doubt should go in favour of game rather than any individual, SC to BCCI. Link to comment
StriKe Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 HeadlinesToday @HeadlinesToday 1m1 minute ago Cricket is a religion in this country; crores of people are passionate about the sport, you are killing the game: SC to BCCI NEWS FLASH Link to comment
StriKe Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Press Trust of India @PTI_News You will have to address question of conflict of interest as head of BCCI and also as owner of IPL team, whose official is found to be involved Freddie Wilde @fwildecricket 40s40 seconds ago Supreme Court questions N. Srinivasan's return as #BCCI chief, says no distinction between Indian cricket Board and #IPL. #Mudgal FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports 2m2 minutes ago SC: If BCCI president owns a team, is it not a conflict of interest? #Mudgal #srinivasan Link to comment
Sachin=GOD Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Press Trust of India @PTI_News · 4m 4 minutes ago Cricket must be played in its true spirit and should remain a gentleman's game: SC to BCCI. If you allow these things to happen, then you are killing the game of cricket, SC to BCCI on IPL spot fixing scandal. We take the findings of Justice Mudgal Committee's report as gospel truth: BCCI tells SC. Benefit of doubt should go in favour of game rather than any individual, SC to BCCI. HeadlinesToday @HeadlinesToday 1m1 minute ago Cricket is a religion in this country; crores of people are passionate about the sport, you are killing the game: SC to BCCI NEWS FLASH Press Trust of India @PTI_News You will have to address question of conflict of interest as head of BCCI and also as owner of IPL team, whose official is found to be involved Freddie Wilde @fwildecricket 40s40 seconds ago Supreme Court questions N. Srinivasan's return as #BCCI chief, says no distinction between Indian cricket Board and #IPL. #Mudgal FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports 2m2 minutes ago SC: If BCCI president owns a team, is it not a conflict of interest? #Mudgal #srinivasan Awesome!!! Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted November 24, 2014 Author Share Posted November 24, 2014 @timesnow · 1m 1 minute ago You have to address question of conflict of interest as head of BCCI & also as owner of IPL team, whose official is found to be involved: SC What will Srini and CSK do now? Link to comment
StriKe Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 Freddie Wilde @fwildecricket 4m4 minutes ago SC tells Srinivasan that he will have to address question of conflict of interest as head of #BCCI and also as owner of #IPL team. #Mudgal Freddie Wilde @fwildecricket 1m1 minute ago The #BCCI says 'criminal action' will be taken against the guilty when SC asks if there will be only 'administrative action'. #Mudgal #IPL Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted November 24, 2014 Author Share Posted November 24, 2014 Board backs Sundar Raman and Srini.Means zilch in front of the SC. Link to comment
Lord Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 @timesnow · 1m 1 minute ago You have to address question of conflict of interest as head of BCCI & also as owner of IPL team, whose official is found to be involved: SC What will Srini and CSK do now? I guess he'll get a puppet as a candidate for BCCI post :hmmm: Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted November 24, 2014 Author Share Posted November 24, 2014 I guess he'll get a puppet as a candidate for BCCI post :hmmm: If someone becomes BCCI President he cant be a puppet anymore because he doesnt need anyone after that.So every President acts according to his will. Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted November 24, 2014 Author Share Posted November 24, 2014 As per Times Now BCCI tried to make the PIL look motivated prompting the SC to make above observation. The SC also said that "Whether Srinivasant wants to sit in and preside over liquidation of cricket". Link to comment
Crookbond Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 It most likely looks like curtains for Srinivasan as a BCCI president ... "at least". Also, Meiyappan/Kundra will face criminal charges - but I don't think they will be much. Link to comment
StriKe Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 3.10: BCCI tells court India Cements owns team, not Srinivasan The board has trotted out its usual defence of Srinivasan's situation, saying the company India Cements owns the team and not Srinivasan in his individual capacity. This is, of course, a fig leaf. Srinivasan is the managing director of the company and effectively runs Chennai Super Kings, which is a subsidiary of India Cements. The BCCI has also asked the Srinivasan be reinstated as president as there is nothing against him. Link to comment
Sachin=GOD Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 CNN-IBN News @ibnlive 4m4 minutes ago BCCI tell SC not to divulge the whole report as careers of cricketers will be affected. #IPLSpotFixing LOL.... Link to comment
Lord Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 3.10: BCCI tells court India Cements owns team' date= not Srinivasan The board has trotted out its usual defence of Srinivasan's situation, saying the company India Cements owns the team and not Srinivasan in his individual capacity. This is, of course, a fig leaf. Srinivasan is the managing director of the company and effectively runs Chennai Super Kings, which is a subsidiary of India Cements. The BCCI has also asked the Srinivasan be reinstated as president as there is nothing against him. :haha: Link to comment
Lord Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 CNN-IBN News @ibnlive 4m4 minutes ago BCCI tell SC not to divulge the whole report as careers of cricketers will be affected. #IPLSpotFixing LOL.... unless there are serious charges against cricketers,I agree actually.We saw what happened with Binny and others.Our media loves these things Link to comment
StriKe Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 FirstpostSports @FirstpostSports 7m7 minutes ago SC TO BCCI: Take action against those named, you have no option #Mudgal Follow Live here - > http://www.firstpost.com/sports/will-supreme-court-reinstate-srinivasan-as-bcci-president-1815739.html Link to comment
Sachin=GOD Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 unless there are serious charges against cricketers' date='I agree actually.We saw what happened with Binny and others.Our media loves these things[/quote'] If someone has been named in the report then the name should be made public and the cricketer banned. Otherwise the names will only be in the context of players being interviewed as part of the investigation - no harm in revealing this since I am sure the many big players as well as owners from all teams would have been questioned just to get a clear picture of the whole thing. Link to comment
Malcolm Merlyn Posted November 24, 2014 Author Share Posted November 24, 2014 3.10: BCCI tells court India Cements owns team' date= not Srinivasan The board has trotted out its usual defence of Srinivasan's situation, saying the company India Cements owns the team and not Srinivasan in his individual capacity. This is, of course, a fig leaf. Srinivasan is the managing director of the company and effectively runs Chennai Super Kings, which is a subsidiary of India Cements. The BCCI has also asked the Srinivasan be reinstated as president as there is nothing against him. Trying to teach the SC law. And time and again trying to force the SC to reinstate Srini.When will he know that it doesnt work with the SC. Link to comment
Sachin=GOD Posted November 24, 2014 Share Posted November 24, 2014 SC judge: It's really incomprehensible on his part that a BCCI official who runs the Board also owns a team. SC to BCCI: How will you take action against ex Prez when he is standing again for next term? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now