The Outsider Posted December 22, 2007 Posted December 22, 2007 Lurker, it's quite possible that the reserves were not included in the count, Muslims or otherwise.
Lurker Posted December 22, 2007 Posted December 22, 2007 AT LEAST answer this Q. If 3 eqaully qualified officers were shorltlisted for Sonia gandhi's personal security' date=' and if one of them was a sikh in a Delhi college in 1984 ( Sikh riots), do you think it is unlikely for that particular candidate NOT to be considered, because of obvious security risks when compared to other 2 ?[/quote'] Hahaha..You have so made an error without even realizing it Hari. In your analogy the operative context is - 1984 riots and a chap affected by it. For starters I would argue that it is discriminatory and illegal but lets go ahead and assume that for a second. Now my first question to you is - Would a Sikh from Bangalore be allowed to guard Sonia? Someone who was born far far away from Delhi? My second question to you would be - Were Sikhs allowed to guard Sonia before 1984? heck wasnt Indira gandhi defended by Sikhs? So if the issue is 1984 what is the logic behind keeping Muslims away? Which bring me to my question which you keep escaping from - What have the Muslim officers of Indian Armed Forces done to be mistreated? Give me some examples. xxx
Lurker Posted December 22, 2007 Posted December 22, 2007 Raju Thomas' date= an india-born American academic who interviewed army officers, found that "when the [india-Pakistan] war began in September 1965, a Muslim majority battalion of the Rajput Regiment stationed in the crucial Poonch sector of Jammu and Kashmir, far from being hastily withdrawn, was allowed to play its part in the execution of the army's forward actions. According to several high-ranking Indian army officers, the fact that the battalion did not flinch and carried out its assigned role with considerable credit, sufficiently dispelled worry- at least within the military- about the loyalty of Indian Muslim soldiers." In the same war, two Muslim soldiers Havildar Abdul Hamid of the Grenadier Regiment and Maj. M.A.R. Sheikh received high military honours for gallantry, a pattern repeated in the 1971 war between the two countries over Bangladesh There you go! How many more evidences do you need guys?? Just admit you were wrong and lets be done here.
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 22, 2007 Posted December 22, 2007 Amry generals know what they are doing.. They very aptly employ these peple thereby taking any recurrance of parititon-time like event out of euqation. I see no reason to give letures to army generals on how to run the show. Their method is efficient and there is no room for politicising them. Full marks to them for saying know to the communal number-count.. all these numbers u guys are putting is just hear-say noone will ever know what goes inside. Yes the critical mass theory fortriggering separatis that means mmutiny in army holds. Every politician across party line knows that and understands the fact that army is too important an insittution for political slug-fest so they let generals do what is required for the defence.. Latest case in point was dropping of communal head-count projet when army general protested yes despite commies wielding so much power they didn;t allow it. All this and that raju gentleman and xyz's words are mere speculation viz a viz army demogaphy..
Lurker Posted December 22, 2007 Posted December 22, 2007 Amry generals know what they are doing.. They very aptly employ these peple thereby taking any recurrance of parititon-time like event out of euqation. I see no reason to give letures to army generals on how to run the show. Their method is efficient and there is no room for politicising them. Full marks to them for saying know to the communal number-count.. all these numbers u guys are putting is just hear-say noone will ever know what goes inside. Yes the critical mass theory fortriggering separatis that means mmutiny in army holds. Every politician across party line knows that and understands the fact that army is too important an insittution for political slug-fest so they let generals do what is required for the defence.. Latest case in point was dropping of communal head-count projet when army general protested yes despite commies wielding so much power they didn;t allow it. All this and that raju gentleman and xyz's words are mere speculation viz a viz army demogaphy.. Rant as usual. Come back when you find a comment by recruitment offficial that Gujjus are leading from the front. Tab tak aise hi rant mode mein on raho :hysterical::hysterical:
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 23, 2007 Posted December 23, 2007 sometime I pity ur mental state lurker.. those smiley aren't going to answer the question.. BTw once again today 7 of ur peace lover brothers were cuaght today of course for their peace work of corodniated bomb-blast in UP.. accept my condolences :hysterical:
Recommended Posts