Guest dada_rocks Posted December 20, 2007 Posted December 20, 2007 http://dailypioneer.com/indexn12.asp?main_variable=front%5Fpage&file_name=story2%2Etxt&counter_img=2 Manmohan says terorsim comes due to social deprivation basically toeing mullah line totally oblivious of the fact that oen afetr another terrorists have come from privilged background.. Anyway Modi calls his psec bluff.. Modi bluntly rejected the theory that terrorism was nourishing because of economic poverty and gave the example of Punjab, a prosperous State that was once badly afflicted by it. "It is a problem of an ideology and attitude towards life of intolerance." The Gujarat Chief Minister lashed out at the UPA Government for not approving the anti-terror law GUJCOC that the State legislature had passed many years ago. ( point to note exactly same law has bene given go ahead in mahashrtsa long time back... and if u thought centre is worried about encounter-kiling increasing then it wud be pertinent to mention here that Maharashtra tops the encounter-killing roster)
kumble_rocks Posted December 21, 2007 Posted December 21, 2007 Modi bluntly rejected the theory that terrorism was nourishing because of economic poverty and gave the example of Punjab, a prosperous State that was once badly afflicted by it. "It is a problem of an ideology and attitude towards life of intolerance." Silly post ! Looks like Modi is insinuating that Sikhism breeds intolerance !
The Outsider Posted December 21, 2007 Posted December 21, 2007 Silly post ! Looks like Modi is insinuating that Sikhism breeds intolerance ! First hand experience!!:hysterical:
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 21, 2007 Posted December 21, 2007 Silly post ! Looks like Modi is insinuating that Sikhism breeds intolerance ! This is classic case of putting words into others mouth.. I don't see menton of word Sikhism anywhere.. His point is separatist have ideology terror comes from that they cud be well off which was the case in Punjab. I know u have no rebuttal for it hence this pathetic attempt to change topic..
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 21, 2007 Posted December 21, 2007 Ya to side mein khade hoke dekho ya participate kado ye one-liners without rhyme reason with smileys doesn't aid debate at all..
The Outsider Posted December 21, 2007 Posted December 21, 2007 If your above statement is directed at me, I don't partake in lengthy "debates" anymore at least online. It took me some time to realize the futility of it but der aaye drust aaye. I have better things to do than "debate" with right wing bigots online but why should that stop me from having a laugh at one loony post after another? And no don't bother answering the question, it's a rhetorical one.
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 21, 2007 Posted December 21, 2007 Translation: I don't have wherewithal and every time I attempt I get cornered because my psec crap is seldom tenable. Anyway go ahead do better things whatever that is ........
THX_1138 Posted December 23, 2007 Posted December 23, 2007 You know DR if you dont like anything a sensible, well respected, oxford educated man says, and would rather take the words of an alleged criminal, very possibly guilty of an attempted genocide, then there is little i can do to convice you otherwise. if you do not think that the minorities of india are marginalized, and these minorities i speak of are the social economic minorities rather than a religious community, then you really must take some time to visit villages and communities in the boondocks of your own state. modi has been periodically victorious since he has done considerable good for the local economy of gujurat which deserved applause... but is it wise to attain that economic progress for a select community only? you do realize that just about every local and foreign impartial moderator has declared modi's sytem of governance a form of pseudo fascisim? how useful is that to a nation hurtling down the highway of progress and better and more available democracy?
Guest dada_rocks Posted December 23, 2007 Posted December 23, 2007 U are clueless like anyone else.. 75% of india lives in village noone can win election by only working for handful of urban class.. he has won by landlside even in rural gujraat. but that's nto the point this communalisation of state budget smacks of "muslims have first claim to resources" theory.. I reject that in toto don't care where it comes from.. It smacks of naked communalism by congress ....
sandtest Posted December 23, 2007 Posted December 23, 2007 Let our internet elite Indians sitting in west and watching dhimmified media conclude whatever they wish. fact is that Modi enjoys a grassroot support of "Junta janaradan". This support is solidly based on education, developement and grassroot works for people of Gujarat and not through plain and "self-inflicted" morality polishing speeches of appeasement.
Recommended Posts