Anakin Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 I was not replying to you or most people. Obviously' date=' it's [b']your eyesight that's the problem. However, my hearing is fine and I've heard Australia has, twice, won 16 Tests in succession. What is India's record in this regard ? I'm sure the little bear falls under most people ie not with dim eyesight. Last time I checked India's been playing with a max of 11 players and quite often sans 2/3 depending on some OZ extras.
Dravid Posted January 27, 2008 Author Posted January 27, 2008 whats is aus's rec compared to indias in 20-20?
Dravid Posted January 27, 2008 Author Posted January 27, 2008 >What is India's record in this regard ? u dont know??
King Tendulkar Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 The troll is back now aussies have done ok. Only ok mind
cochise Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 Hmmm...Indian bowlers not attacking the stumps...bowling wide? I think the results speak for themselves...6 out of 10 wickets bowled, 1 to the keeper 1 to the slips and only 2 in the outfield. I think we can safely say that the stumps were being bowled at.
beetle Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 All the australian aura of playing aggressive cricket has been shoved right back up their @$$. They were playing for a draw but are somehow ashamed to admit it. So true..
Anakin Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 What is India's record in this regard ?Keep asking the same stupid question, just confirms your senility more than anything else :haha: BTW why does it take 13+ players to win? You don't know?
Anakin Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 What is India's record in this regard ?Playing with less than 11 players often :cantstop:
cochise Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 I don't know actually...it's not 16 in a row for sure. I think we can safely assume it is less, otherwise it would have made the news by now. Records can only be basked in for the moment....because as they are set, they become a target for surpassing...the first step of which, is to stop the target receeding. This has been achieved by stopping it at 16. Now for the harder part...which may take a while.
beetle Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 We are doing fine Donny. Doing well...playing the game honestly. You worry about your team that has been found out now.They can't cheat blatently now with 13 men in their team and can't go on abusing other teams so freely.The spot light is on them..... Let's see how many more16 win records they can make.... When is the next time they meet India?:wink_smile:.......
talksport Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 I don't know actually...it's not 16 in a row for sure. I think we can safely assume it is less, otherwise it would have made the news by now. Records can only be basked in for the moment....because as they are set, they become a target for surpassing...the first step of which, is to stop the target receeding. This has been achieved by stopping it at 16. Now for the harder part...which may take a while. Good Post... As for Hayden ..he has a history of trolling.
beetle Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 As for Hayden ..he has a history of trolling. :D
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now