Predator_05 Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 He did. He was doing commentary for Set Max. I also think he has a couple more years of commentary left in him.
King Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 Suppose Azhar, Salim Maliik and the rest of his battalion could be drafted too in that case.
The Outsider Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 Jadeja was given a clean chit by the court and featured in FC matches after that, so can't be counted in with the likes of Malik, charges against whom still stand.
King Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 Jadeja was given a clean chit by the court and featured in FC matches after that' date=' so can't be counted in with the likes of Malik, charges against whom still stand.[/quote'] Change it to Manoj Prabhakar then, he was only banned for 5 years after he had retired :-D
Desi Cartman Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 I think Jadeja was given permission to play till the corruption cases get sorted out .. those cases are still pending !
The Outsider Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 No, the High court cleared him after which the BCCI made some noise about going to the Supreme court, but don't think ever did.
Desi Cartman Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 No' date=' the High court cleared him after which the BCCI made some noise about going to the Supreme court, but don't think ever did.[/quote'] Yes & that probably because he has a lot of pull in the BCCI
DomainK Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 From what I remember, they didnt have much of a case against Jadeja apart from statements form bookies and phone calls made from bookies to Jadeja. The court's view was that since there were no calls from Jadeja to the bookies and since all the calls made from bookies to Jadeja were of very short duration...in seconds each time, Jadeja probably disconnected after an initial introduction. And bookies statements were not enough to nail him.
Guest Hiten. Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 From what I remember' date=' they didnt have much of a case against Jadeja apart from statements form bookies and phone calls made from bookies to Jadeja. The court's view was that since there were no calls from Jadeja to the bookies and since all the calls made from bookies to Jadeja were of very short duration...in seconds each time, Jadeja probably disconnected after an initial introduction. And bookies statements were not enough to nail him.[/quote'] Bookie: "check your email/mail" Jadeja: "Ok" ....is also an example of 2 sec conversation :giggle:
DomainK Posted June 1, 2008 Posted June 1, 2008 I seriously wonder why criminals like bookies dont use anonymous e-mail ids with proper proxy settings for communications. High time criminals got tech savvy.:D
Recommended Posts