DomainK Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 A friend of mine has asked this question. Anyone knows? Name the Cricketer who scored more runs than the whole opposition team could both in the first and second innings of a Test Match ?
Kumar Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 http://www.cricinfo.com/database/ARCHIVE/1930S/1938/AUS_IN_ENG/AUS_ENG_T5_20-24AUG1938.html
DomainK Posted August 4, 2008 Author Posted August 4, 2008 len hutton against australia in oval 1938 There Hutton did not bat a second time. The condition is that the batsman batter twice and each time outscored the opposition.
DomainK Posted August 4, 2008 Author Posted August 4, 2008 Matt Hayden. Against Pak in Sharjah.... Same in that match. Hayden did not bat a second time.
DomainK Posted August 4, 2008 Author Posted August 4, 2008 Langer at Perth against Pakistan. :two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up::two_thumbs_up:
The Outsider Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/statsguru/engine/match/64113.html
Chandan Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 Same in that match. Hayden did not bat a second time. So, what the question is? Batsman's first innings score =greater than opposition's first inning score AND batsman's second inning score is greater than opposition's second inning score? But think about it, if one batsman will make more than the first innings score of the opposition, why will he need to bat again? I think you are not understanding the question. The answer is Matt Hayden: http://ind.cricinfo.com/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/2002-03/AUS_IN_PAK/SCORECARDS/AUS_PAK_T2_11-15OCT2002.html
DomainK Posted August 4, 2008 Author Posted August 4, 2008 So, what the question is? Batsman's first innings score =greater than opposition's first inning score AND batsman's second inning score is greater than opposition's second inning score? But think about it, if one batsman will make more than the first innings score of the opposition, why will he need to bat again? I think you are not understanding the question. The answer is Matt Hayden: http://ind.cricinfo.com/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/2002-03/AUS_IN_PAK/SCORECARDS/AUS_PAK_T2_11-15OCT2002.html I also thought the same Chandan, but the question is quite clear and thanks to Shwetabh, we have the answer now as well. Cricket can get strange sometimes.
Kumar Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 it was a badly put question in which hard to understand
Kumar Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 this wuld have made for sense, what batsmen scored more runs in his first innings compared to the the whole team in their first innings and scored more runs in his second innings compared to the oppostions team in their second innings of the same match
PaiN_KiLLeR Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 Matt Hayden. Against Pak in Sharjah.... Are you referring to the 'greatest test match of all time' ? The unforgettable 59 and 53 all out? :-D
Dirty_South Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 Are you referring to the 'greatest test match of all time' ? The unforgettable 59 and 53 all out? :-D Yup. :giggle:
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now