Guest dada_rocks Posted August 21, 2008 Posted August 21, 2008 I thought that the goal according to Hinduism for all living beings is to get out of this cycle of reincarnation and reach heaven? Either ways, even if we include all forms of animals and insects (the number of species in this itself is close to 2 million (conservative estimate), the total number of insects that are in the planet are close to 10 quintillion, the numbers wont add up to support this theory. Why does it not add up: not all of those from other species get to become human ..Nobody said all of them suddenly turns into human being.... If you are hell bet on not accepting this theory that's fine but it makes credible mathematical sense..
triam Posted August 21, 2008 Posted August 21, 2008 Why does it not add up: not all of those from other species get to become human ..Nobody said all of them suddenly turns into human being.... If you are hell bet on not accepting this theory that's fine but it makes credible mathematical sense.. how does that make mathematical sense? if it can be proved mathematically, that the sum total of lives or souls in the world remains constant, with rules describing how the physical manifestation changes from one form to another (what does a cat need to do to become a dog) etc, and the rules describing of how humans get out of this cycle and we come up with an equation Total number of lifes in 2000 = total number of lifes in 2005 - number of people who attained moksha, and this statement is falsifiable then me accepting or not accepting this theory doesnt make an iota of difference that this is a true and valid claim.
Guest dada_rocks Posted August 21, 2008 Posted August 21, 2008 Now you are suddenly asking for proof.. there is nothing provable in matters of faith everything is theory.. i was just propping up the theory of possibilityfor the benfit of those who could not concieve this possibility.. My point is if you take the collective picture despite incarantion-theory it's possible to explain ever increasing number of human beings..
triam Posted August 21, 2008 Posted August 21, 2008 Alright, I guess I misinterpreted your earlier post.
THX_1138 Posted August 21, 2008 Posted August 21, 2008 Dude that answer everyone knows ..here I am trying to reason with those who don't believe in reincaranation but believe in religion.. so to be precise, members of the abrahamic faiths?
THX_1138 Posted August 21, 2008 Posted August 21, 2008 Now you are suddenly asking for proof.. there is nothing provable in matters of faith everything is theory.. i was just propping up the theory of possibilityfor the benfit of those who could not concieve this possibility.. My point is if you take the collective picture despite incarantion-theory it's possible to explain ever increasing number of human beings.. i think you need to replace the word theory with conjecture or belief. theory refers exclusively to a statement that is verifiable by means of experiment and is thus falsifiable.
THX_1138 Posted August 21, 2008 Posted August 21, 2008 Alright' date=' I guess I misinterpreted your earlier post.[/quote'] some greek philosopher you are.
triam Posted August 21, 2008 Posted August 21, 2008 some greek philosopher you are. :haha: Although it is below the belt, since I have not seen your body of work related to physics to retaliate about your being Einstiens reincarnate.
Desi Cartman Posted August 22, 2008 Author Posted August 22, 2008 Albert einstien eh' date=' I used to argue about the inconsistencies in the stories my grandmom used to tell me related to ramayan and mahabarat, I guess I am reincarnation of some greek philosopher:D:D:D[/quote'] is your name Dr Zakir Naik :nervous:
THX_1138 Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 is your name Dr Zakir Naik :nervous: that goof is not a philosopher, he is well a goof, a very very daft goof. i mean, his logic for refuting the theory of evolution is so motherfracking dumb that i am lead to believe that his so called doctorate of medicine might be a farce.
Holysmoke Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 I believe in it. I have undergone Past Life Regression myself.
Desi Cartman Posted August 22, 2008 Author Posted August 22, 2008 that goof is not a philosopher, he is well a goof, a very very daft goof. i mean, his logic for refuting the theory of evolution is so motherfracking dumb that i am lead to believe that his so called doctorate of medicine might be a farce. I like it when he says "mecca is at the center of the earth" ... center of the earth :hmmmm2:
THX_1138 Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 I like it when he says "mecca is at the center of the earth" ... center of the earth :hmmmm2: poor at geometry too... run a search for mecca, madina, and neil armstrong just for the giggles.
Desi Cartman Posted August 22, 2008 Author Posted August 22, 2008 poor at geometry too... run a search for mecca, madina, and neil armstrong just for the giggles. Ixfk4LsKWnw
punjabi_khota Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 Ixfk4LsKWnw :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: SUBHAAN ALLAAH
Desi Cartman Posted August 22, 2008 Author Posted August 22, 2008 :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: SUBHAAN ALLAAH check this one out .. some people r so stupid H7ceyrBw50Y
Guest dada_rocks Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 those threats work.. heck feeding pork worked too in case of chechanyan terrorists..
Guest dada_rocks Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 that goof is not a philosopher, he is well a goof, a very very daft goof. i mean, his logic for refuting the theory of evolution is so motherfracking dumb that i am lead to believe that his so called doctorate of medicine might be a farce.he does not have doctorate in medicine he is a simple MBBS doctor.. I wonder why people with medical degree not phd who work in field other than medicine trumpet the designation Dr.. what does MBBS degree bring to the table for a religious commentator.. incidentally this tradition is too rampant in pakistan all the zillion doctors their strutting around on tv channels are MBBS one might think they have Phd degree in the subject they are pontificating about but no .. same is the case with this Dr Joker Naik..
CC1981 Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 Reincarnation : i accept Buddha/Nagarjuna's idea of reincarnation, where they argue that the spirit of someone's actions, the causality of one's actions and the emotions of a person get re-incarnated throughout time. The circular nature of history is proof of this IMO, where similar events keep playing themselves out as the causality of one's actions along with the spirit of it is embedded in the collective conciousness/social conciousness and keeps re-asserting itself. But reincarnation, as in the hindu thinking of one's imperishable soul being continuously re-born and re-incarnated? utterly and 100% prime quality boolsheet of circular reasoning and zero evidence whatsoever.
triam Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 Ixfk4LsKWnw Man you cant even good parody that equals this.
Recommended Posts