DomainK Posted September 2, 2008 Author Posted September 2, 2008 now this list has AFRIDI at 31. YES' date=' AFRIDI!!!!!!!!!!!!! Therefore, whatever methodology was used to derive this list, its completely flawed UNLESS you guys are willing to accept that AFRIDI indeed deserves the 31st place. :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:[/quote'] Where did you find Afridi at 31? Its a list of 30 batsmen.
ucilite Posted September 2, 2008 Posted September 2, 2008 Where did you find Afridi at 31? Its a list of 30 batsmen. here is the complete list: http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/ci/content/story/367281.html
Holysmoke Posted September 2, 2008 Posted September 2, 2008 yes, crap list. Hussey at 39, Yuvraj at 37, and afridi at 31. Its a testament to the gulf between SRT and King Viv that they top even the crap lists.
Predator_05 Posted September 2, 2008 Posted September 2, 2008 Tendulkar would top any list compiled for "best ever ODI batsman" - no matter what statistical criteria is applied. Prove me wrong
fineleg Posted September 3, 2008 Posted September 3, 2008 Another of the famous Indian "contribution" to the world thanks to the recent IT success. Dissecting cricket with Intel processors. In the list compiled Viv Richards has an adjusted strike rate of 24.60(out of possible 25) while Kapil Dev has 24.21. This when the actual SR of Viv was 90 and Kapil's 95. So after adjusting strike rates Kapil Dev falls behind Viv. Yeah sure I will buy that. Viv and SRT are from different eras. Stupid to say that SRT >> Viv or vice versa. If SRT is #1 in this era, Viv is #1 of his era. You cannot say who is better amongst the two. Arbitrary ranking system employed.
MalikBrother Posted September 3, 2008 Posted September 3, 2008 Afridi at 31? That's crazy. Who has listed Afridi at 31? .
h4te Posted September 3, 2008 Posted September 3, 2008 Why are some important ppl like Sunil Gavaskar' date=' Venkatesh Prasad, Harvinder Singh, Venkatapathy Raju, SS Das, not figuring in this list?[/quote'] lol wut?
bharat297 Posted September 3, 2008 Posted September 3, 2008 Viv and SRT are from different eras. Stupid to say that SRT >> Viv or vice versa. If SRT is #1 in this era, Viv is #1 of his era. You cannot say who is better amongst the two. Arbitrary ranking system employed. Thats true ... but I think most cricket experts would agree that Sachin and Viv are the best 2 ever in ODIs by a long way.
DomainK Posted September 3, 2008 Author Posted September 3, 2008 Thats true ... but I think most cricket experts would agree that Sachin and Viv are the best 2 ever in ODIs by a long way. I agree. Viv and SRT stand apart distinctly in ODI cricket. No one else even gets close.
Dinx - the Jinx Posted September 3, 2008 Posted September 3, 2008 i am nt able to understand how this list was arrived at. can smeone point me to the explanation
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now