Dinx - the Jinx Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 Watson hopes for Symonds Test role Shane Watson's skills make him the most convenient replacement if Andrew Symonds is ruled out © AFP The expected withdrawal of Andrew Symonds for next month's tour of India has the allrounder Shane Watson thinking about what would be his greatest challenge. Symonds, who was sent home from the one-day series against Bangladesh for going fishing, is waiting to start formal counselling sessions as part of his Cricket Australia rehabilitation and it is highly unlikely he will be picked in the Test squad towards the end of this week. Watson has won support from James Sutherland, Cricket Australia's chief executive, who admitted Symonds could be lost to the game. "I don't think that's impossible," Sutherland said on ABC radio when asked if Symonds might never play for Australia again. "I think the message the Australian players have sent is that we want Andrew Symonds in our team, but we want Andrew Symonds absolutely committed and wanting to be there. They're really asking him that question. If he can't answer that question, it may well be that he's lost to the team." Sutherland said being without Symonds would be a "great loss", but there were other young talents who could fill his place. "People like Shane Watson may well get the opportunity they've yearned for for so long in his absence," he said. Watson is the most convenient contender for the No. 6 spot and his all-round skills would give Australia options, including playing another spinner. However, Simon Katich and David Hussey, the batsmen who are part-time bowlers, may also come into contention, especially if fitness concerns remain over Matthew Hayden (heel) and Ricky Ponting (wrist). "There is absolutely no doubt that, if I get the call-up, this would be the biggest challenge I could face as a cricketer," Watson told the Sydney Morning Herald. "We've only won once there in 30-odd years as it is, and there are obviously other considerations as well this time around. I would love to go, but I am not going to spend too much time worrying about selection, like I used to. If it happens, it happens." Watson said the team was "wishing the best" for Symonds, "but if there is an opportunity there, hopefully I can take it with both hands". "The leadership group have made a difficult decision [to send Symonds home from Darwin], but the message they were trying to convey was that they needed everyone at 100% to set a good example to the young guys." After missing the first game in Darwin with a leg problem, Watson picked up 29 and 27 as an opener as well as 2 for 8 in the final encounter. The last of his three Tests came against West Indies in 2005-06, when he partially dislocated his shoulder and was replaced by Symonds. Link to comment
Desi Cartman Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 I want Symo and I also want them to use 3rd umpire for the BG series Link to comment
DomainK Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 I want Symo and I also want them to use 3rd umpire for the BG series You mean the review system? Link to comment
Laaloo Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 Methinks WAtson will be more dangerous than symmonds in the upcoming series. Link to comment
Dirty_South Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 yes....Watson is dangerous Link to comment
f.b.m Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 No, I think Symonds will be much more useful in Indian conditions. I base this on how he played in the useless 7 match ODI series against us. He reminds me of Matthew Hayden and thats not good news for us. And lets face it, its pretty much about batting. Both Watson and Symonds are only any good with the ball in EXTREMELY friendly conditions (Watson can be used like Ganguly was in England and Symonds will only be good in day 5 unless its one of ouy masala wickets) Link to comment
Dravid Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 better to have watson in the squad.. 1 test and he will be injured.. :hahaha: Link to comment
f.b.m Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 Besides, I really admire his fighting spirit. And I dont mean the spirit of getting into fights. The number of times that Symonds has taken Australia out of a hole is quite remarkable. Just in recent tests, I can remember the Sydney test (well, with a bit of help), the Perth test (61-5 to a 200+ total) and the Sabina Park test where Australia was 18-5 . Link to comment
Chaos Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 got to agree symonds is the best CRUNCH player i have seen, just like gilly he fires exactly when your team neeeds them to. Link to comment
Desi Cartman Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 You mean the review system? yes Link to comment
Desi Cartman Posted September 9, 2008 Share Posted September 9, 2008 Besides' date=' I really admire his fighting spirit. And I dont mean the spirit of getting into fights. The number of times that Symonds has taken Australia out of a hole is quite remarkable. Just in recent tests, I can remember the Sydney test (well, with a bit of help), the Perth test (61-5 to a 200+ total) and the Sabina Park test where Australia was 18-5 .[/quote'] We all know how many times he was given not out in the SCG and same thing happened in the Sabina park test( 2 incorrect decisions again ) Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now