The Outsider Posted February 2, 2009 Posted February 2, 2009 ofcourse he chucks and that is unfair...now philanthropy is a separate matter not connected to cricket but his wickets, he did chuck. he did "get clearance", so politically correct thing is he does not chuck. Can you explain in 15 words or less what chucking is?
graphic23 Posted February 2, 2009 Posted February 2, 2009 I firmly believe that he doesn't chuck. His arm is naturally that way. The same folks who have said Parmar chucks have said that Murali doesn't. He has gone through the test several times and he's been cleared so, he doesn't chuck.
fineleg Posted February 2, 2009 Author Posted February 2, 2009 straightening the arm while bowling. ofcourse the panel graciously changed degrees etc. Anyway, those who want to believe he is genuine can do so.
The Outsider Posted February 2, 2009 Posted February 2, 2009 straightening the arm while bowling. ofcourse the panel graciously changed degrees etc. Anyway, those who want to believe he is genuine can do so. Are you aware that everyone was found to be "chucking" according to the straightening of the arm definition without the "changed degrees" except Sarwan?
fineleg Posted March 6, 2009 Author Posted March 6, 2009 add ian butler to the hyper appealing list. Relentlessly looooong appeal - he would not stop appealing and umpire lifts the finger up when there was no bat involved in a caught behind. (sehwag the victim)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now