Holysmoke Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 #1 They held the record for the most runs or wickets for their country at some point. Dravid? Never held most runs. Link to comment
nikred Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 #1 They held the record for the most runs or wickets for their country at some point in test matches. thats interesting Link to comment
nikred Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 they never missed any matches due to injuries.:nervous: Link to comment
manoj_admlab Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Dravid? Never held most runs. oh that's true. Link to comment
nikred Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 #1 captains?? I already said that. The answer is WRONG.:finger: Link to comment
nospam Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Team 1: They never took paternity leave. Link to comment
nikred Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 there has to be some kind of hint.:(( Link to comment
umpire Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Team # 1 They have either opened boliwng and batting for their country Link to comment
umpire Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Team # 2 They were not out for score of more than 50 when their team was all out. Link to comment
suraj Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Team # 1 They have either opened boliwng and batting for their country Don bradman didn't do either IMO Link to comment
Dhondy Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 They were all dropped from their national side at some point. Link to comment
umpire Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 ^may be, but he was 1 down batsman, so chances of him opening in a game or two is high. Anyways I have cracked the code. Team # 1 has never been stumped Link to comment
suraj Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 ^may be, but he was 1 down batsman, so chances of him opening in a game or two is high. Anyways I have cracked the code. Team # 1 has never been stumped Wow How did you get that!!! Link to comment
suraj Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 ^may be, but he was 1 down batsman, so chances of him opening in a game or two is high. Anyways I have cracked the code. Team # 1 has never been stumped Never mind Incorrect! AP Gurusinha st Parore b Bradburn 22 (NZ vs SL) Link to comment
umpire Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 ^ I don't knw, was looking at Don Bradman's stat and saw 0 stumping and I am sure Dravid has never been stumped (sucker never goes out of his crease). its educated guess Link to comment
suraj Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 ^ I don't knw, was looking at Don Bradman's stat and saw 0 stumping and I am sure Dravid has never been stumped (sucker never goes out of his crease). its educated guess Its not the right answer http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=609708&postcount=55 Link to comment
suraj Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Ok Donny atleast tell us if one of us is getting closer to the mark at all: something to do with an all round performance? Partnership records?? something to do with the order listed in your query? Age ( youngest to achieve record etc??) Link to comment
punjabi_khota Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Its not the right answer http://www.indiancricketfans.com/showpost.php?p=609708&postcount=55 Then we can say each of them has been stumped once or less...whatever. Let Nk=number of times kth batsman in the list was stumped. N*=max(N1,N2,....,N11) So every player in the list has been stumped < N*+1 times. Q.E.D Kthxbye. Link to comment
umpire Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 ^thats heavy maths and logic for Donny to comprehend. He will run away now Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now