Online Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 http://www.cricinfo.com/women/engine/current/match/312284.html :cantstop::cantstop::cantstop::cantstop:
The Outsider Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 :hysterical::hysterical: They actually batted for 18 overs!! L Mienzer* 1(48) - captain's innings!!
nospam Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 lol, look at the ages:- Linda Mienzer = 44 years Wendy Woodley = 41 years Suzette Albouy = 44 years Maryellen Jackson = 41 years Terry-Lynn Paynter = 40 years Reuna Richardson = 17 years ...
The Outsider Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 I just noticed 10 out of their score of 13 were extras. :omg:
Ram Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 Thats pathetic, wasnt someone not even good enough to at least edge one to the boundary? How did they even let this match happen? Why is thethe gap betwee men's and women's cricket is so effin huge? I mean, in sports like tennis, its quite interesting (:winky:) to watch women play. But, its almost unbearable to watch women play cricket.
Guest Gunner Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 Thats pathetic, wasnt someone not even good enough to at least edge one to the boundary? How did they even let this match happen? Why is thethe gap betwee men's and women's cricket is so effin huge? I mean, in sports like tennis, its quite interesting (:winky:) to watch women play. But, its almost unbearable to watch women play cricket. Directly proportional to funding.
Guest Gunner Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 I wonder what the two captains said at the post match conference. :winky:
Ram Posted June 25, 2009 Posted June 25, 2009 Maybe, just like basket ball, women's cricket should use smaller bats and lighter balls. P.S: :D:D:D
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now