bobbydhillon Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 Why do we have the rule that there should be players from each team ? The limit of four players per team will force people to choose from at least four teams and that should be sufficient. This restriction may have some validity when the number of teams are less but not here. The plus of doing away with this is that on weekends, one will not have to around in the small interval between the two matches which - I have been crying about this for two years - makes it very difficult for people who want to .
thevortex Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 ^ Yeah minimum from each team does not make sense with a 10 point sub penalty. There is no minimum requirement anymore. This makes sense!
dev.goswami Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 Why do we have the rule that there should be players from each team ? The limit of four players per team will force people to choose from at least four teams and that should be sufficient. This restriction may have some validity when the number of teams are less but not here. The plus of doing away with this is that on weekends, one will not have to around in the small interval between the two matches which - I have been crying about this for two years - makes it very difficult for people who want to spend weekends on better things. ^ Yeah minimum from each team does not make sense with a 10 point sub penalty. There is no minimum requirement anymore. I support..if the mods don't agree this way..can we please have a poll..to see what the majority support
gaurav92 Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 What a comeback by me :woot: I iz 54 along with SEXY :woot:
dev.goswami Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 Just saw..somone has made min from each team 0 :woot: whoever it is thank you :hatsoff: And even i is make good come back...from >50 i is come back to 101 :((
ViruRulez Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 Ow' date=' puck, I forgot :(([/quote'] Bring on Tait ... let him face the music .. Masca is in my SS and I dont want him smashed too much :hitler:
gaurav92 Posted March 16, 2010 Posted March 16, 2010 I bounced to 27 after 158, WOW, i want to get to top 10 now After subbing i am back to 43
Bumblebee Posted March 16, 2010 Posted March 16, 2010 Please add paras dogra to Royals squad and bond knight rider's squad!
ViruRulez Posted March 16, 2010 Posted March 16, 2010 Bond is playing in this match and his option is not there in SS .. so do I replace somebody else or what else do I do :hmmm:
Sachinism Posted March 16, 2010 Posted March 16, 2010 Everyone will suffer the same consequences, pick someone else
ViruRulez Posted March 16, 2010 Posted March 16, 2010 Everyone will suffer the same consequences' date=' pick someone else[/quote'] yup did so sometime ago
Gunner_Mania Posted March 16, 2010 Posted March 16, 2010 Bond for Langevldt fecked up my SS, not only did I lose Substitution points, it was so late, I couldn't sub him again. Subs were open, but when I pressed save, SS said match had started:((
Dinx - the Jinx Posted March 16, 2010 Posted March 16, 2010 removing the min. 1 player per team rule was great. thanks a lot :two_thumbs_up:
Dinx - the Jinx Posted March 16, 2010 Posted March 16, 2010 Viru gets pwned by hanuman puttar for choosing albie over him...
ViruRulez Posted March 16, 2010 Posted March 16, 2010 Viru gets pwned by hanuman puttar for choosing albie over him... I just logged in ICF and I am really fecked .. lost nearly 4 positions ... I did not sub for CSK in this match and continued with last CSK match subs .. I thought of subbing Kemp for Dhoni until the final minute before match but then thought of saving 10 points by keeping Kemp as I would not need to make subs.. taht is some brutal fecking for me .. my subs for KKR are also sucking today .. Hodge and Tiwary both gone and both were in my SS :(( Ek din me saara SS barbaad ho gaya mera :((
Recommended Posts