EnterTheVoid Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 Graphic, when you champion ethics and morality, you either champion it for everyone or champion it for no one. You can't be morally selective based on players you like / dislike man, that's BS
achilles Posted March 15, 2010 Author Posted March 15, 2010 I find all sledging distasteful. So raising the question about sledging Clarke on his personal life is a moot question to me. Degrees of sledging or abuse is something very hard to define. You either are fully for it or fully against it. That is why Mcgrath must be castigated for his part in that episode with Sarwan. And he was far more guilty than Sarwan too - of transgressing the lines of sportsmanship and even decency. To keep things simple & straight- He was calling for it and he knew it was coming. I really hope Styris and Co. pick on Clarke.
graphic23 Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 Yeah, and thats why I didn't say anything about Hussey defending Clarke. I dont agree with folks who think he's wrong to take time off for the incident with his fiancee or wife or whatever. But when you ask me why someone wouldn't defend Clarke, I gave you 2 reasons. I'm sure there are plenty more. I think its hysterical for anyone from Australia to ask the press and players of the hosting country to lay off a player. I will show you a plethora of articles from "esteemed" journalists like Malcolm Conn who had to say plenty of things about India before even the series began. For the record, in an attempt to defend Australian players, they even attacked India's caste system and listed out the castes of each Indian player - on Cricinfo!
graphic23 Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 To keep things simple & straight- He was calling for it and he knew it was coming. I really hope Styris and Co. pick on Clarke. I certainly hope not! Seeing as how you've attacked McGrath and other Aussie players from your OP and other posts in this thread, wouldn't this be, I dont know - the exact opposite of what you were trying to preach. NZ players are nice enough to not do that - and its a sham that Vettori's team hasn't been winning the Spirit of Cricket award - even more ridiculous is that Sri Lankans have been winning it. They are very very good sportsmen.
achilles Posted March 15, 2010 Author Posted March 15, 2010 I certainly hope not! Seeing as how you've attacked McGrath and other Aussie players from your OP and other posts in this thread, wouldn't this be, I dont know - the exact opposite of what you were trying to preach. NZ players are nice enough to not do that - and its a sham that Vettori's team hasn't been winning the Spirit of Cricket award - even more ridiculous is that Sri Lankans have been winning it. They are very very good sportsmen. Yeah mate. But these guys really boil me up. As in, seriously do they lack proficiency with bat and ball to need the lip to win? I know the NZ guys won't do anything unless provoked. Just some banter to cheer our man 99.94 FM up :--D. And don't you find it a bit strange that the Aussies are now acting all Nice and noble when it comes to sledging, telling others whats good and whats not when they've themselves been overstepping the line for years at stretch? I think the boys are just caught up in their own crap and are going all defensive. Personally, this comment is another apt example of- EK TOH CHORI, UPPAR SE SEENAZORI :hehe: Also, Sri Lanka wins the award coz maybe they don't get involved in controversies like NZ and is a clean team? I don't remember when was the last time a SL player had a bustup with the opposition
EnterTheVoid Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 For the record' date=' in an attempt to defend Australian players, they even attacked India's caste system and listed out the castes of each Indian player - on Cricinfo![/quote'] Can you please provide the link to this.
Bradman99 Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 I think that as soon as you make personal sledges, you have taken it too far. In this case it is clear McGrath is in the wrong, Sarwan isn't innocent though. If you can condone people picking on Clarke for his situation, then you are all just as bad.
graphic23 Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 Can you please provide the link to this. http://www.smh.com.au/news/cricket/a-class-act-opinions-differ/2008/01/04/1198950076545.html - The article on SMH The cricinfo response - http://www.cricinfo.com/magazine/content/story/329291.html
Bradman99 Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 To keep things simple & straight- He was calling for it and he knew it was coming. I really hope Styris and Co. pick on Clarke. Yeah, good on you mate
Mr Eintstein Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 I think that as soon as you make personal sledges, you have taken it too far. In this case it is clear McGrath is in the wrong, Sarwan isn't innocent though. If you can condone people picking on Clarke for his situation, then you are all just as bad. you misunderstand what most people on this thread are saying. i haven't read any posts saying coming out of nowhere with an attack about someones personal life is ok. what people are saying, is that if clarke sledges anyone first, hes not going to get any sympathy for what comes back at him.
Bradman99 Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 you misunderstand what most people on this thread are saying. i haven't read any posts saying coming out of nowhere with an attack about someones personal life is ok. what people are saying' date=' is that if clarke sledges anyone first, hes not going to get any sympathy for what comes back at him.[/quote'] I think you misunderstood what I was saying. I never said anyone said that, I just stated my opinion. And as for that last line, I don't think thats what achilles was saying.
Rajan Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 Roshan Mahanama has mentioned in his book that Glenn McGrath called Sanath Jayasurya-"black monkey". no ban nothing. he lied later and said he never called Sanath like that. But certainly Darren Lehmann was banned for calling some one" black cvnt". Aussies were/are racists, probably some foreigners settled in australia, would not mind the tag of 2nd class citizens, good on their self respect!
Rajan Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 Yeah' date=' I am serious. You are a graduate student who I am sure attends a bunch of seminars - try asking someone delivering a talk how his adviser or mentors' dick tasted like and come back with the results of the anthropological experiment? I'll be interested in reading your thoughts and results.[/quote'] :hysterical:
99.94 Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 Aussies were/are racists' date=' probably some foreigners settled in australia, would not mind the tag of 2nd class citizens, good on their self respect![/quote'] Is that why over 150,000 Indians are living here? They want to join the '2nd class citizens'? EDIT: 150,000 people living here who were born in India.
IKnowU Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 Before we blame someone else should we not look at our own country and see the discriminatory caste system, ugly religous acts and killing in the name of honour????
Arkem8 Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 Before we blame someone else should we not look at our own country and see the discriminatory caste system' date=' ugly religous acts and killing in the name of honour????[/quote'] Please migrate to Australia, there you won't have to live with such a conscience.... http://www.smh.com.au/news/cricket/a...950076545.html - The article on SMH The cricinfo response - http://www.cricinfo.com/magazine/con...ry/329291.html more BS western propaganda, they use examples of current 3rd world depravity to justify their own wrongful/grievous past.. Idiots like the one above fall for these double standards...
EnterTheVoid Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 you misunderstand what most people on this thread are saying. i haven't read any posts saying coming out of nowhere with an attack about someones personal life is ok. what people are saying' date= is that if clarke sledges anyone first, hes not going to get any sympathy for what comes back at him. Even if the reverse happened, I still don't think he would get any sympathy.
King Posted March 15, 2010 Posted March 15, 2010 McGrath was a great bowler but an absolute idiot on the field. Off it he's a great guy to talk to but he had no reason spewing at people at every given opportunity in the name of mental disintegration and sledges. He's got personal with a lot of players and he was a **** on the field simple as that. McGrath is a great man outside the cricket arena, one of the noble ones but again he's not looked up as a good guy given his persona in the cricket field and his image that comes across as a brat on telly. I think McGrath deserved every possible abuse given he was the first one to give. As for Kiwis giving Clarke a hard time, there will obviously be one or two odd comment from behind the stumps during the test (You know from whom). I don't think the rest of the black caps are silly enough to dig one's personal issues. That said Clarke was torn apart by the Aussie media already, couple of them traveled with him on the same flight sitting next to him bothering him all the way. Aussie media is ruthless and they will do everything to bring Clarke down. Kiwis shouldn't even bother wasting their time.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now