gs Posted May 10, 2010 Posted May 10, 2010 Not sure if she means business or just tough posturing for public consumption, but ppoyyz seem to be in trouble. Clinton warns Pakistan of terror 'consequences' Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has warned of "severe consequences" if a terror attack against the US would ever be traced back to Pakistan. She told CBS while Pakistan had become more helpful in tackling extremists, co-operation could still be improved. A Pakistani-born US citizen has been charged with an attempted bombing in Times Square in New York a week ago. Earlier, Defence Secretary Robert Gates said the US was prepared to increase military assistance to Pakistan. "We're willing to do as much... as they are willing to accept," he told reporters. "We are prepared to do training, and exercise with them. How big that operation becomes is really up to them." But he played down the chances of an extended crackdown on militants, saying Pakistani forces were already "thinly stretched". 'Double game' In an interview with CBS television's 60 Minutes programme, Mrs Clinton said there was now a "much better relationship" between the US and Pakistani governments, militaries and intelligence services. "I think that there was a double game going on in the previous years, where we got a lot of lip-service but very little produced," she said. We've gotten more co-operation and it's been a real sea change in the commitment we've seen from the Pakistan government. We want more US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton But the past two years had seen "the killing or capturing of a great number of the leadership of significant terrorist groups", Mrs Clinton added. "We've gotten more co-operation and it's been a real sea change in the commitment we've seen from the Pakistan government. We want more. We expect more." "We've made it very clear that if - heaven-forbid - an attack like this that we can trace back to Pakistan were to have been successful, there would be very severe consequences," she warned.
King Tendulkar Posted May 10, 2010 Posted May 10, 2010 O now they have been hit by the pak scum bags they suddenly want to take paks to task. While we get whacked every other day by the scum bags and USA say we should talk with them. The word hypocricy comes to mind. We should worry about our interests and not contantly bow to pressure from yanks in such regards
siddhu Posted May 10, 2010 Posted May 10, 2010 I am not defending them .... but why should they care if we are getting whacked... If we don't care we are getting whacked and if we don't do anything about it... why should they care.
Clarke Posted May 10, 2010 Posted May 10, 2010 Get used to it already: 1) Terror attack attempted. 2) USA: This is very bad, there will be disastrous consequences. 3) Pak: We can help you. We are fighting terrorism. 4) USA: Do more. 5) Pak: We need more to do more. 6) USA: OK, here's some billion dollars, F-16s, laser guided bombs, naval frigates (to fight the Taliban!) .. 7) Goto 1.
Pak_Fan_4_Eva Posted May 10, 2010 Posted May 10, 2010 Ha! i`d like to see them try. Severe consequences :haha: We`ll hand them back their assess back in less than a week :two_thumbs_up:
Gunner_Mania Posted May 10, 2010 Posted May 10, 2010 Ha! i`d like to see them try. Severe consequences :haha: We`ll hand them back their assess back in less than a week :two_thumbs_up: :hysterical:
gs Posted May 10, 2010 Author Posted May 10, 2010 O now they have been hit by the pak scum bags they suddenly want to take paks to task. While we get whacked every other day by the scum bags and USA say we should talk with them. The word hypocricy comes to mind. We should worry about our interests and not contantly bow to pressure from yanks in such regards Wonder if this threat applies to a situation where the "act" is performed by "non state" actors - like Kasab in 2008?!? Poyz will probably be "bombed to stone age" :giggle:
Clarke Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 Ha! i`d like to see them try. Severe consequences :haha: We`ll hand them back their assess back in less than a week :two_thumbs_up: What she must have referred to is drone attacks on targets in cities like Quetta and economic sanctions if the Pak govt does not cooperate as per their expectations, not full scale military invasion. There's no way USA will declare war on an Islamic Republic with a million strong army, not to forget the best terror infrastructure in the world.
King Tendulkar Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 Ha! i`d like to see them try. Severe consequences :haha: We`ll hand them back their assess back in less than a week :two_thumbs_up: What with your pathetic army:hysterical:You have lost 4 wars against India. Just imagine what yanks could do to you if they wished:haha:
CSK Fan Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 Ha! i`d like to see them try. Severe consequences :haha: We`ll hand them back their assess back in less than a week :two_thumbs_up: You think any of your missiles are gonna reach US? Any of your planes? If they want to invade, all they have to do is send planes
Params7 Posted May 11, 2010 Posted May 11, 2010 Ha! i`d like to see them try. Severe consequences :haha: We`ll hand them back their assess back in less than a week :two_thumbs_up: lmao
Clarke Posted May 12, 2010 Posted May 12, 2010 Ha! i`d like to see them try. Severe consequences :haha: We`ll hand them back their assess back in less than a week :two_thumbs_up: btw .. that sounded familiar
Desi Cartman Posted May 12, 2010 Posted May 12, 2010 You think any of your missiles are gonna reach US? Any of your planes? If they want to invade' date=' all they have to do is send planes[/quote'] Their army cant control NWFP forget US of A
THX_1138 Posted May 12, 2010 Posted May 12, 2010 Ha! i`d like to see them try. Severe consequences :haha: We`ll hand them back their assess back in less than a week :two_thumbs_up: some afghani punks said the same to us. they now are fighting over some prime real estate between some gutter, cave, cave with a gutter, and parts of your country. and still some dude sitting in new mexico bombs them with a playstation console. you really think that you can go up against us? really? son we have been bombing the shyte out of brown folks for over a 100 years. we are good at this. do not frack with us.
Jadoo Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 Ha! i`d like to see them try. Severe consequences :haha: We`ll hand them back their assess back in less than a week :two_thumbs_up: :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: And pigs can fly:cantstop:
Tapioca Posted May 14, 2010 Posted May 14, 2010 NEW YORK/WASHINGTON: US Special Representative Richard Holbrooke said that Hillary Clinton’s earlier remarks on severe consequences for a Pakistan-linked attack in the US were misinterpreted, emphasising that the remarks in no way indicated any impact on the flow of US economic and military aid to the country. “As for [her] interview on (CBS channel’s) 60 Minutes (program), I think that perhaps it was not fully understood for what she was saying by some people who didn’t see the full text or didn’t appreciate what she was saying,” said Holbrooke. Holbrooke’s clarification comes on the heels of Pakistan’s objections to Clinton’s remarks. Washington has been encouraged by Islamabad’s help in the ongoing probe, added Holbrooke, saying that Clinton “herself praised the Pakistan government for what it has done.” http://tribune.com.pk/story/12561/clinton-misinterpreted-no-impact-on-aid-holbrooke/
bhanu Posted May 20, 2010 Posted May 20, 2010 http://tribune.com.pk/story/12561/clinton-misinterpreted-no-impact-on-aid-holbrooke/ :hysterical:
CSK Fan Posted May 20, 2010 Posted May 20, 2010 http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/front-page/timing-to-be-decided-by-pakistan-accord-for-operation-in-north-waziristan-050 ISLAMABAD: Pakistan agreed in principle on Wednesday to launch a full-fledged military operation against the Taliban in North Waziristan, but candidly told the United States that the timing of the offensive would be decided by it. So after Sotuh, Its the north's turn
Pioneer Posted May 20, 2010 Posted May 20, 2010 http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/front-page/timing-to-be-decided-by-pakistan-accord-for-operation-in-north-waziristan-050 ISLAMABAD: Pakistan agreed in principle on Wednesday to launch a full-fledged military operation against the Taliban in North Waziristan, but candidly told the United States that the timing of the offensive would be decided by it. So after Sotuh, Its the north's turn Goood news
Recommended Posts