Bradman99 Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 I'm not just saying this because we lost but I was thinking about it the other day and than Ponting came out and also said it maybe should be.. What do you guys reckon, should the final of the 20/20m world cup be a best of 3 series given the nature of the format ? SRT195 1
EnterTheVoid Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 We need to poal to discuss this :winky: On topic, don't know :dontknow:
Precambrian Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 I would love to do away with this semi stuff and instead let the top 2 teams on the basis of their performance in group stages play against each other in finals. That way each game will have importance in the league stage. So yes, removal of semi and best of 3 finals. Must do in world cup as wel.
Guest Hiten. Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 How about having all the games in World T20 be a 3 match mini series between each opponents ? Just to make sure nobody tailgates anyone into the semis :winky2:
Zelig Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 Let's make it a world cup league:dance: More T20s:woot:
Desi Cartman Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 How about having 3 games of 5-5 on the same day :dontknow:
Zelig Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 How about having 3 games of 5-5 on the same day :dontknow: Ur team lost:yousuck:
Desi Cartman Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 Ur team lost:yousuck: and your team ............................ :fail: ?
Jersey #10 Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 So the final should not be a knock out game? Crazy thought. I feel that every wash out game from Super 8s, Semis and Finals should be re-played. It was unfair on SL's part to have lost that final in world cup 2007!
Bradman99 Posted May 18, 2010 Author Posted May 18, 2010 So the final should not be a knock out game? Crazy thought. I feel that every wash out game from Super 8s' date=' Semis and Finals should be re-played. It was unfair on SL's part to have lost that final in world cup 2007![/quote'] 20/20's are short games, they don't last very long. Could easily make it a best of 3 series, adds excitement and means the winner truly earnt it. (not saying England didn't, they deserved it).. Also, how so ? The final was still played, just shortened to 36 overs.
Roshanrocks Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 Let's make it a world cup league:dance: More T20s:woot: yeaaaaaaaahhhhhhh!!!!!1 and the top 2 team face each other in best of 3 finals.... should be fair i suppose :hmmm: same should be done for ODI and test kirkut :D : home and away games :cantstop: will be one massive tournament every 4 years
saneindian Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 Absolutely not. In fact the concept of best of 3 finals is flawed in any sport. Semis and then finals, you play your best on 2 days you deserve to win. You slip up anywhere, you go out, sounds very very logical to me.
Gunner_Mania Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 I wonder if Pantings thinks the same about the ODI World Cups too. Best of 3 finals :hmmm:
Zap_Brannigan Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 Till T20 becomes prominent in international level and has its own rankings, Only top 10 teams divided into 2 groups. Each play the other in the group 2 times.Top 2 goes to a best of 3 finals. 23 games total (max) and every game counts. After T20 gets its own rankings, only top 8 teams in a quaters,semis and finals format with each stage being best of 3. 21 games max and every game counts.
Sachinism Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 Its such a lottery format that you have to play 3 matches to decide who was the best. Why not just scrap the whole thing 2 innings of 20 overs for each team. Attract test match lovers :woot:
SRT195 Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 why only T-20 WC ... why not in 50-50 WC as well:--D seriously ever heard of best of 3 finals in any other sport ... for me any team that reaches final deserves to win it ... the one which performs better & handles pressure on the given day will be called the champs ... there is no need for unnecessarily lengthening the process by making it a best of 3
Zelig Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 Its such a lottery format that you have to play 3 matches to decide who was the best. Why not just scrap the whole thing 2 innings of 20 overs for each team. Attract test match lovers :woot: we're(the outlaws) just fine without them(the corporates):headshake:
Gunner_Mania Posted May 18, 2010 Posted May 18, 2010 why only T-20 WC ... why not in 50-50 WC as well:--D seriously ever heard of best of 3 finals in any other sport ... for me any team that reaches final deserves to win it ... the one which performs better & handles pressure on the given day will be called the champs ... there is no need for unnecessarily lengthening the process by making it a best of 3 somebody from the States can corect me or back me, but the NBA has a best of 7 finals, but I think youare right internationally no sport probably has a best of 3 finals. Even in club football, you have home and away upto the S/F in the Champions league, championship play of S/Fs, but not in the finals.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now