King Tendulkar Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 hi Guys! HAPPY NOW? ;) Why aren't you happy? Or do you follow your high commissoner!
King Tendulkar Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 I was defending nothing or nobody. Simply not assuming anything. Cant deny that somewhere deep down I wanted Aamer to be proven innocent. I guess.....too much to hope for. It is this which has created your delusion and made you look like a conspiracy hungry nut case! As frankly your defence of your countrys traitors has benn pathetic to be honest
Nova Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 I was defending nothing or nobody. Simply not assuming anything. Cant deny that somewhere deep down I wanted Aamer to be proven innocent. I guess.....too much to hope for. Nothing wrong with that. Stick to your guns. If everyone has the same opinion...what the hell is one going to debate? I think Aamer if found guilty will get like a 2 year ban as there might be room for mitigation as per the ICC code. So he should come back and deliver the goods!
King Tendulkar Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 I was defending nothing or nobody. Simply not assuming anything. Cant deny that somewhere deep down I wanted Aamer to be proven innocent. I guess.....too much to hope for. So Mr Conspiracy, what should be the punishment if the videos (SY and ICC belive they are authentic) ar proved to be accurate and spot fiixing is proven correct. What punishments would you give? Remember they are traitors to pakland!
Hindustani Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 Indian TV Reporters are so clueless - In that Dramatic Voice, and showing the pictures above, they said "Raaz Phaash, Dekhye Salman Butt Kaise Ghoom Rah hain Majeed ki Mercedes Mein :cantstop: Next we know Aston Martin sues Samay News :haha::--D You just got a fan dude, that too an Orient PSPO :D
King Tendulkar Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 guys stop bringing religion into this. cheating and them being muslims have nothing to do with each other. Disagree. The delusional conspiracy theories and total denial by paks in this are very much related to their religion. I wont expand as mods will start deleting. But 9/11 denial, mumbai denials etc etc all point to something here.
EnterTheVoid Posted September 3, 2010 Author Posted September 3, 2010 This HC paindo is a laughter riot, saying Indian bookies framed their players http://www.ndtv.com/article/sports/indian-bookies-framed-our-players-pakistan-high-commissioner-49297
thevortex Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 It is this which has created your delusion and made you look like a conspiracy hungry nut case! As frankly your defence of your countrys traitors has benn pathetic to be honest If you are not able to identify which side of the border I fall, you dont deserve a reply - I am afraid.
Fontaine Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 Isn't it amazing how for years ICC and other anti-corruption units have struggled to find concrete evidence and proof regarding bribing/fixing issues in the sport?? Yet, within HOURS the Pakistan high commission has been able to not only identify the culprits but name them as Indian/Asian bookies who have entrapped these poor Pakistan players. Apparently, when it comes to dopers, drugies, ball tamperers and cheats, as long as they are Pakistani's all due process should be followed and they "are innocent until proven guilty." But when it comes to blaming others: Pakistan don't need any such proof, due process and rules. bookies/agents have trapped Pakistani players and we're expected to believe them when they can simply say, well the illegal bookies are the culprits. No wonder, NO ONE takes these clowns seriously.
kabira Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 If you are not able to identify which side of the border I fall' date=' you dont deserve a reply - I am afraid.[/quote'] Dude if you bring Lahori Logic to this discussion, no one is going to take you seriously.
EnterTheVoid Posted September 3, 2010 Author Posted September 3, 2010 Font, compare this HC paindoo's interview (http://cricketcrowd.com/) to the one given by Haroon and the Police chief and the contrast couldn't be starker. The HC paidoo seemed to be chewing paan/bubble gum FFS.
Gunner_Mania Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 Interesting, I am hearing the sky reporter saying that with this case even for the ICC, the guilt must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, which to me feels like they are still leaving the door open for a get away or at best a very light sentence.
IKnowU Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 Pakistan crucifying another Kaptaan..........:rotfl: Whos gonna be the new kaptaan? I mean whos gonna be banned next? It seems whoever the captain is going to get banned. Only Afretard was smart to dodge that :giggle:
SJS50 Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 Scotland Yard finds no solid evidence of matchfixing How can they find any evidence of match fixing when the guy was never trying to fix the match. He was just showing he could get them to do his bidding. Is it so difficult to understand? No it isn't but it is very convenient to talk of match fixing and spot fixing so that these can not be proved and the boys can go scot free. In India it is a very common tactic used by cops when a real big shot is implicated in a crime. They wil charge him with the most heinous of crimes and shout on the TV about how they will not spare anyone how so ever high and mighty he might be. Then the case drags on and on before it finally comes to the courts and there after a prolonged slow trial it gets thrown out - on merit of course. We have the classic case of the Union Carbide gas tragedy where the cops filed a case of mass murder against the Chairman of Union Carbide who was, of course, not guilty as charged. Fortunately, the high profile case wont die down and this week (after 27 years) the Indian Supreme court has asked for a retrial.
kabira Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 ^true. But ICC and ACSU will be looking at 80 odd matches to find any match fixing there. So this might go on for a while.
Fontaine Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 Interesting' date=' I am hearing the sky reporter saying that with this case even for the ICC, the guilt must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, which to me feels like they are still leaving the door open for a get away or at best a very light sentence.[/quote'] That's not a problem. Ofcourse due process must be followed and there's already enough evidence (video, money in Butt's room/lock matches that from the agent) that ICC code was violated (players failing to report approaches/calls from known/banned agents). The issue is going to come down to the number of years these clowns are banned.
Fontaine Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 ^true. But ICC and ACSU will be looking at 80 odd matches to find any match fixing there. So this might go on for a while. Good, they can add that to the ongoing criminal investigation against Danish Kaneria for spot fixing.
punjabi_khota Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 guys stop bringing religion into this. cheating and them being muslims have nothing to do with each other. Lol wut ? I am talking about issues pertinent to good citizens of the islamic republic of pakistan. :haha: Remember the time when Afridi refused to play because he wanted to fast ? :hysterical: Now these 3 can fast all they want :sherlock: ...****ing paki cheating hypocrites
SachDan Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 look at these pics: Photo shopped! 1)Butt fingered from right and in the pic left part of Majeed's trouser is torn :dontknow: Akmal idolizes Robert Green and in the pic he's wearing Man United wrist band :haha: these ****ers got confused between Man United and West Ham United :finger: 2) Salman's mimicking Shakeel Siddiqui and Majeed's facial expression gives the impression he's listening to Veena Malik!
thevortex Posted September 3, 2010 Posted September 3, 2010 Dude if you bring Lahori Logic to this discussion' date=' no one is going to take you seriously.[/quote'] 1. Learn to speak for yourself to start with. 2. I dont post here so that you can take me 'seriously'. Seriously :).
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now