vamos_rafa Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 The curious case of Niall O'Brien's ‘missing kitbag' took another turn as it has come to light that the Irish player had damaged the door of the visiting team's dressing room at the Chinnaswamy Stadium on Sunday. Niall was run-out on 46 during the game that Ireland eventually lost to India. The incensed player had knocked down the door on his way back after being dismissed. The door, a brand new one that was installed in the refurbished dressing room, was severely damaged. The Karnataka State Cricket Association secretary Javagal Srinath, who is also on the ICC panel of match referees, levied a fine of Rs. 20,000 on the Irish team as per the rules. It is learnt that after some initial reservation the Irish management agreed to pay. OFFICIALS PERPLEXED However on Monday, Niall claimed that his bag containing six bats was missing. He immediately went to the Cubbon Park Police Station and lodged a complaint. A KSCA official said that all the bags were tallied when they were taken from the ground on Sunday night and that Niall's kit was intact. The KSCA officials are perplexed that Niall and the Irish management did not intimate the host association first about the ‘missing bag.' Now, can anyone please explain to me, why were the aussies let off for damaging the TV??
DomainK Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Now' date=' can anyone please explain to me, why were the aussies let off for damaging the TV??[/quote'] I think the Aussie incident was blown out of proportion by the media. According to CA version that I read (dont ask for a link, I dont have it), Ponting's guard did bounce off hit a tv, but it was unintentional and the tv was not damaged. The report of a broken tv was wrong.
julianlev Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 there was no reason for O' Brien to be upset I thought Ireland acquitted themselves really well against a powerful Indian lineup If they continue to impress like this Test status cannot be far off
vamos_rafa Posted March 9, 2011 Author Posted March 9, 2011 ^ Being upset or not does not give you the freedom to damage any properties. Yes, they have been impressive but they must guard against such activities.
kabira Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 I think the Aussie incident was blown out of proportion by the media. According to CA version that I read (dont ask for a link' date=' I dont have it), Ponting's guard did bounce off hit a tv, but it was unintentional and the tv was not damaged. The report of a broken tv was wrong.[/quote'] if TV wsa not broken why would association file a complaint?? Does not make sense to me.
vamos_rafa Posted March 9, 2011 Author Posted March 9, 2011 if TV wsa not broken why would association file a complaint?? Does not make sense to me. Yeah right. I think the CA was able to do arm twisting and got away with it but the Irish could not.
achilles Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Yes, lets fine the poor chaps Rs.20,000. These are guys who don't even 1/4th the money our single player does. And lets "forgive" Ricky Ponting and not even fine his sorry backside.
Switchblade Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Yes' date=' lets fine the poor chaps Rs.20,000. These are guys who don't even 1/4th the money our single player does. And lets "forgive" Ricky Ponting and not even fine his sorry backside.[/quote'] +1
Sachinism Posted March 9, 2011 Posted March 9, 2011 Dont buy the BS from CA. What do they mean by guard? The family jewels protector? That can no way damage a tv especially if it bounced off something else
EwanMacKenna Posted March 10, 2011 Posted March 10, 2011 Because Australia, India and England run world cricket maybe, and the ICC treat smaller teams like crap?
bihutoli Posted March 10, 2011 Posted March 10, 2011 I think Ponting paid for the damage. Remember reading it somewhere!
achilles Posted March 10, 2011 Posted March 10, 2011 Because Australia' date=' India and England run world cricket maybe, and the ICC treat smaller teams like crap?[/quote'] Maybe. But trust me on this. India will NEVER try to belittle a smaller team. We have a saying, "Atithi Devo Bhava".
ganeshran Posted March 10, 2011 Posted March 10, 2011 Maybe. But trust me on this. India will NEVER try to belittle a smaller team. We have a saying' date=' "Atithi Devo Bhava".[/quote'] We have a lot of saying, doesnt mean we folllow each one of them
achilles Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 Ricky Ponting's payment was voluntary. He wasn't "punished"/"fined"/"ordered to pay" like our friend Niall here.
therocky Posted March 11, 2011 Posted March 11, 2011 We all know how much our media likes to over exaggerate news, Newspapers have more gossip about celebrities than actual news. If Ponting indeed broke the tv intentionally he should have been fined and the matter should have ended at that but it is double standard for Niel O'brien to be fined and not Ponting but I think Ponting did pay the fine.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now