Sachin=GOD Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 You are indeed understanding the post correctly. You are an okay. :-) Okay.
SachDan Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 You are indeed understanding the post correctly. You are an okay. :-) okay
ganeshran Posted March 21, 2011 Author Posted March 21, 2011 You are indeed understanding the post correctly. You are an okay. :-) okay
pensionplan Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 srtfanaticssuck :hehe:Yes exactly. If you count there are four of them above. :-)
Sid Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Yes exactly. If you count there are four of them above. :-) Okay :cantstop: I m no.5
Sachin=GOD Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Yes exactly. If you count there are four of them above. :-) Okay.
pensionplan Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Okay :cantstop: I m no.5Not bad. That is the number of World cups SRT lost to this point. :-)
Sachin=GOD Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Not bad. That is the number of World cups SRT lost to this point. :-) Okay.
Sid Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Not bad. That is the number of World cups SRT lost to this point. :-) Okay
Holysmoke Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 Actually you guys should've stopped wasting your time discussing with him' date=' the moment he admitted to being "opportunistic and trollish".[/quote'] okay
vaibhav_delhi Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 ok ... Pls tell me what it is. somewhat like post#191 bcoz that's where your posts seem to be heading towards.:)
vaibhav_delhi Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 It is that, in India, if you speak against the popular voice/trend, you are entitled to be treated an intellect and supposed to stand out of the crowd. Nopes. that's not my intention. I totally believe in what I've written and feel sad that many people are not able to appreciate it.
ganeshran Posted March 21, 2011 Author Posted March 21, 2011 Not bad. That is the number of World cups SRT lost to this point. :-) okay
The Outsider Posted March 21, 2011 Posted March 21, 2011 vaibhav, why are you finding it so hard to understand simple things : 1. Since Tendulkar scores more centuries than anyone else his centuries in win percentage is going to be closer to the team's overall winning percentage. 2. Small numbers make a lot of these statistics quite meaningless the way you are presenting them. For example you are saying his win percentage is 55% since 2000 (11 out of 20). Before the world cup it was 11 out of 18 - 61%, which according to you is an acceptable figure. 3. Over the last few years, Tendulkar has been skipping a lot of the easier series. But you haven't taken this into account while calculating the numbers. 4. From my naive thought Indian batsmen are more likely to get complacent and throw away their wickets if say Gambhir, Yuvraj, Dhoni etc. score a hundred. If Tendulkar does it then in their minds they would still think that these might be difficult conditions and we still have to apply ourselves. But if lesser batsmen score hundreds, then there are more chances of being complacent. Is that not right? You are just trying to force causality into correlations.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now