Jump to content

Sehwag vs Anwar in ODIs as opener


Recommended Posts

Posted

Used to love watching Anwar bat ,such a classy player .But Sehwag has reached such heights in test cricket as an opener that this comparison even though in ODI's looks absurd.

Posted
sehwag averages 22 again aus and 29 against sa
So both suck against the best odi team of their time. But Sehwag can do more damage to other remaining sides as he has better Strike rate. Anwar as opener average 1.7 more than Sehwag in ODI. But his SR is 22 less.
Posted
this satya guy is one heck of a troll.. wonder why this moron doesnt even get warned let alone ban
Fully agree. Just look at the nerve of that guy to compare a legend like Sehwag with a flat track bully Anwar! It's insulting to cricket fans' intelligence everywhere and joke threads like these devalue this forum. A better comparison should have been between Anwar and Sohail, or Anwar and Nick Knight.
Posted
Tell you what lets now open a Zaheer Khan vs Wasim Akram thread... :dance:
Zaheer has best bowling strike rate of all the bowlers who have taken more than 40 wickets in WC.:dance::dance:
Posted
Zaheer has best bowling strike rate of all the bowlers who have taken more than 40 wickets in WC.:dance::dance:
Absolute legend that's what Zaheer is :hatsoff: And that too without resorting to bottle caps :two_thumbs_up:
Posted
BTW, whered did you get the audaqcity to compare sehwag with this maestro? Sehwag is good mashallah, but you give this comparison anywhere else (considering this is an indian forum), you are in for a huge backlash.
Anwar isnt fit to tie Sehwag's shoelaces as a batsman........
Posted

I used to like Anwar compared to Sohail. He went on with his business. I think probably Sehwag lacks Anwars cosistency in ODI. But Sehwag is brutal. And the stats dont tell you that. Sehwag Demoralizes the opposition ala SemiFinal where he took gul apart. Or 195 on the first day in Australia. And that inturn helps people coming down the order. Anwar failed to do this consistantly.

Posted
I used to like Anwar compared to Sohail. He went on with his business. I think probably Sehwag lacks Anwars cosistency in ODI. But Sehwag is brutal. And the stats dont tell you that. Sehwag Demoralizes the opposition ala SemiFinal where he took gul apart. Or 195 on the first day in Australia. And that inturn helps people coming down the order. Anwar failed to do this consistantly.
In Tests it's a No Contest. Sehwag is heads and shoulders above Anwar due to his penchant of scoring big runs at a fast pace all over the world. In odis they are comparable but would go for Sehwag due to the shock value he provides. To use your example, his attack on Gul in the semi final totally took Gul out of the equation and Gul was so fazed he was scored off even by Bhajji :hysterical: This is what Sehwag can do to you. Overall Sehwag way way ahead of Anwar.
Posted

anwar was good, no doubting that, but if you remove that 194 innings (which coventry equalled) then suddenly sehwag's dominance looks larger.

Posted
BTW, whered did you get the audaqcity to compare sehwag with this maestro? Sehwag is good mashallah, but you give this comparison anywhere else (considering this is an indian forum), you are in for a huge backlash.
.I remember he always use to play his A game against India . Anwar was good Mashallah and I'm really happy for you, but SEHWAG is one of the best Destructive batsmen of ALL TIME!! Of ALL TIME!
Posted

Look, time and enviroment seems to e giving a wrong indication Cricket was a lot harder in Anwar's time, the bowling level was quite immense compared to now. Sehwag still has a mediocre average in odi cricket, Anwar has always been above 40.

Posted
Look' date=' time and enviroment seems to e giving a wrong indication Cricket was a lot harder in Anwar's time, the bowling level was quite immense compared to now. Sehwag still has a mediocre average in odi cricket, Anwar has always been above 40.[/quote'] Anwar record outside sub-continent is dire not mediocre. He doesn't average 40 as opener and has a very poor strike rate. Anwar is good because he was Pakistani. In other countries he would have been dropped.
Posted

If Anwar would have played for India, he would have ranked below Sehwag. Because Pakistanis dont have that many classy batsmen, he is hyped to a ATG great which he is not. Anwar was a more elegant batsman while Sehwag has not textbook technique, has amazing hand eye coordination which makes him very destructive. Anwar basically performed a different role for Pakistan than what Sehwag does for India. A more apt comparison would be with Gautam Gambhir.

Posted

I think we need to stop comparing. These are useless debates. Nobody is going to get convinced either way. Statistics is a good tool but does not show the whole picture. What statistics miss is the impact a person makes on opponent as well as their team members. On numerous occasions I have seen Indian team in a different spirit when SRT is there as compared to when SRT is absent. He may not play a gem of an innings, he may get out for a duck but he still makes a difference on the psychs of his team members. I am pretty sure there might have been a time when Pakistan team looked up to Anwar for inspiration. As Indian team looks up to Sehwag or SRT. This just shows the importance of each person to their team. And I think we can discuss this instead of who was better. The above is my opinion and nothing more.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...