Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Why do people care so much about affairs of sportspersons? :dontknow: Isnt it their personal matter..
usually people don't care if someone like Shane Warne has an affair because these guys have that kind of an image but when someone like Tiger Woods or Ryan Giggs has an affair then I guess some people are disappointed because these guys have built an image of being saints and are role models for millions of young kids around the world.
Posted
It isn't as simple as that 1. It sets a precedent for more heinous cover ups like parties dressed up as a Nazi (Max Mosley) 2. Sex with an underage person (potentially a criminal offence) I could go on. The moment you stop giving out those injunctions people will lose interest in who slept with whom, you are actually spicing up the interest. Lastly in this day and age, super injunctions are meaningless (as it covers only England) and a website based in the US could give out this info. What is the point then of these injunctions when everyone knows?
usually people don't care if someone like Shane Warne has an affair because these guys have that kind of an image but when someone like Tiger Woods or Ryan Giggs has an affair then I guess some people are disappointed because these guys have built an image of being saints and are role models for millions of young kids around the world.
But unless nothing illegal is going on (Like gunner's example of underage sex), the state or any individual has no business poking into the bedroom habits of sportspersons and their fidelity. I think the only people (other than their families) who have the right to object are the sponsors who use the image of the sportsperson to sell their products and pay him for that. These people are losers in case of such scandals since the brand image of the product is tied to the clean image of the individual.
Guest Gunner
Posted
But unless nothing illegal is going on (Like gunner's example of underage sex), the state or any individual has no business poking into the bedroom habits of sportspersons and their fidelity. I think the only people (other than their families) who have the right to object are the sponsors who use the image of the sportsperson to sell their products and pay him for that. These people are losers in case of such scandals since the brand image of the product is tied to the clean image of the individual.
It is not the state wanting to know this information. The key point is muzzling the press and secondly potential for people to do all kinds of nonsense and then getting injunctions preventing others from talking about it. Ex: The UK football manager who has an injunction preventing the husband of the woman he slept with from talking about it, this is just preposterous.
Posted

Mumbai Indians represented by upcoming Lawyer/die hard fan Mariyam have filed for a Super Injunction barring anyone in the media/cricket forums from accusing son of the soil of being a useless captain for the team this season. Their defense? Double Jeopardy. Explained Mariyam, "since Sachin has already been successfully accused of being a useless captain for India, he can't be accused again.". J/K - Sachin Bhaktas, pls don't issue a fatwa on me. :pray:

Posted

A Super-Injunction prevents Yoda from being funny ever again. It came into effect on 10th October 2006. PS: I absolutely hate it when the judiciary wastes its time to prevent stuff that is never likely to happen anyways. :P

×
×
  • Create New...