vamos_rafa Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Yes, they have always been like that. During the 80s when WI reingend supreme, they used to say that these are criminals on the field who need to be stopped. Now its India!! They cant see people winning and they cant win themselves
asterix Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 I know that was not right, but I had enough of his piss take of Indians India, BCCI etc..
King Tendulkar Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 KT' date=' is it really true that TCCB & MCC colluded to save pussy English cricketers by limiting the number of bouncers in an over?[/quote'] Yep and they still kept losing
Guest Gunner Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 I know that was not right' date=' but I had enough of his piss take of Indians India, BCCI etc..[/quote'] I don't prevent you from saying anything about the ECB, that is fair game. Go for it. :winky:
riwi999 Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 The biggest difference between BCCI and other Boards is that the BCCI is not sophisiticated enough to not appear like a greedy Board. The ECB, on the other hand, looks very "professional" on the surface but scratch a little beneath the surface and you will see ugly warts. Remember the leaked out e-mails between some county chiefs when they tried to work out a deal for an IPL-type tournament in England? Many counties showed interest, it was kept hush-hush but it got leaked and a few guys were left with eggs on their faces. Basically, all boards are looking to make as much money as possible. For the board members in particular. For the ECB guys, it is lucrative pension for them. I am not a big supporter of the BCCI but I do not like the hypocrisy of other Boards, especially he ECB which acts like the custodian of cricket (which is ostensibly being destroyed by the BCCI). Remind me again who sold their souls to a Texan scamster?
ganeshran Posted July 29, 2011 Posted July 29, 2011 Is it just me or Allen Stanford looks like Yusuf Raza Gilani in disguise :hmmm2:
achilles Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 The BCCI have a duty to the game And England didn't when they were ruling cricket? The ECB gave and gives to the game still I agree. It gave us T20 and is now crying about how T20 is killing cricket. Oh ya, between all this crap, England played a $1m dollar game and the players are yet to see the money. So much for giving :hehe:
wobblydoggy Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 It brought shame to cricket by prostituting the game. It brought shame on ECB i will agree.
wobblydoggy Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 And England didn't when they were ruling cricket? I agree. It gave us T20 and is now crying about how T20 is killing cricket. Oh ya, between all this crap, England played a $1m dollar game and the players are yet to see the money. So much for giving :hehe: You are so bitter you forget all the money time and effort given to the game by England and Australia down the years. To local clubs in countries all over the world To grass roots cricket I am sure the BCCI are supporting grass roots cricket in other countries?
wobblydoggy Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 wobbly am still asking for answer to my questions, which you are hiding from. Got nothing have you? Keep desperatly googling until you have something to throw at BCCI. I have asked you since yesterday and still nothing?Shows you have nothing in mind just agenda of hate. Keep googling:cantstop: I am not googling I have said the problem I have with the BCCI, it is blatent self interest to the detriment of all others. We were never like that we always tried to support the game as a whole
wobblydoggy Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 And England didn't when they were ruling cricket? I agree. It gave us T20 and is now crying about how T20 is killing cricket. Oh ya, between all this crap, England played a $1m dollar game and the players are yet to see the money. So much for giving :hehe:[/QUOTE] The idiot at the head of the ECB made a bad decision. He should of checked his facts better. But it did not do you any harm or other countries except say WI who were duped by that Texan too
Alchemist Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 BCCI is not doing any harm either. It is filling ICCs pockets too. There is a reason why ICC and other boards are quite. They are getting their share too.
wobblydoggy Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 That's what he's been doing from the get to. Overlooking the sh*te ECB put cricket through and focusing solely on BCCI being a cancer by trying to divert topics to suit his purpose. What Sh**e did we supposedly put cricket through. Come on name the supposed crap. And dont give me the 1 million dollar crap I mean what did we do to harm other countries like the BCCI are trying to do You talk alot of Sh*te yourself
wobblydoggy Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 BCCI is not doing any harm either. It is filling ICCs pockets too. There is a reason why ICC and other boards are quite. They are getting their share too. Yes but the BCCI is trying to get a super league just for the supposed 'big boys' which of course wall always mean India. That is crap and harming cricket at the lower levels
Alchemist Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 Yes but the BCCI is trying to get a super league just for the supposed 'big boys' which of course wall always mean India. That is crap and harming cricket at the lower levels What "big boys" ?
achilles Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 You are so bitter you forget all the money time and effort given to the game by England and Australia down the years. To local clubs in countries all over the world To grass roots cricket I am sure the BCCI are supporting grass roots cricket in other countries? Sri Lanka and Bangladesh are still playing cricket because we have adopted them. Zimbabwe has not been blacklisted coz BCCI wants them to play. Unlike England, we have not castigated and punished a country for the acts of one man. We are a great country, we care for all the member nations equally and treat them fairly. PS - I just can't seem to understand why it is difficult for the English and the Aussies to get used to seeing us in the Boss' chair. Look, we are gonna be running the game for another 10-20yrs. Love it or hate it, you've gotta deal with it.
wobblydoggy Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 It brought shame to cricket by prostituting the game. :hysterical: What do you think the IPL does. Its influence on scheduling to appease TV companies and make lots of $$$$$ causes all sorts of problems to the real cricket of Tests and one day games. Players chasing big $$$$ are changing their focus to hitting big etc, soon we wont have real test players just guys who can hit the ball a long way:((
wobblydoggy Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 Sri Lanka and Bangladesh are still playing cricket because we have adopted them. Zimbabwe has not been blacklisted coz BCCI wants them to play. Unlike England, we have not castigated and punished a country for the acts of one man. We are a great country, we care for all the member nations equally and treat them fairly. PS - I just can't seem to understand why it is difficult for the English and the Aussies to get used to seeing us in the Boss' chair. Look, we are gonna be running the game for another 10-20yrs. Love it or hate it, you've gotta deal with it. You fool How can English teams tour Zimbabwe when English and European people are getting murdered every day there. It would be like you touring Pakistan Whilst at war with them DUH
Alchemist Posted July 30, 2011 Posted July 30, 2011 India' date=' SA, Aus and Eng[/quote'] Other countries don't have leagues. You don't want dull games being played. Wasn't Eng and Aus against teams in WC ?
Recommended Posts