Jump to content

Sachin v/s Lax for Carnish


Recommended Posts

Posted
which is why your hero struggles in debates .... Anything multiplied by zero gets turned into a zero' date=' therefore when you put your hero [b']against a zero, the hero becomes a zero and zero a hero :hysterical:
against doesn't mean multiplied! Stop using the same 4th grade math that helped you come up with rpt :giggle:
Posted

this is why i decided to refrain from this discussion... it takes up a lot of time arguing on the basis of mere opinions which are basically different to each individual. And usually people use stupid stats like RPT and all to prove they are correct... even in the other thread i was only replying to ganesharan and not others after a while. Its nice to discuss indian cricket and cricketeers but to compare between two or maybe three best batsman we ever produced by smear basis of stats is stupid... its just someone likes one of the fab 4 better than the rest.... everyone has their favourite cricketeers... mine is sourav but i cannot go on and claim he is the best... similarly i like laxman and dravid better... its just that i am more assured when i see those two bat and thats the only thing i had said in the previous thread too which was turned into an issue making me anti-SRT... and therefore i wished it better to refrain from these discussions... I chickened out... lol:giggle:

Posted
this is why i decided to refrain from this discussion... it takes up a lot of time arguing on the basis of mere opinions which are basically different to each individual. And usually people use stupid stats like RPT and all to prove they are correct... even in the other thread i was only replying to ganesharan and not others after a while. Its nice to discuss indian cricket and cricketeers but to compare between two or maybe three best batsman we ever produced by smear basis of stats is stupid... its just someone likes one of the fab 4 better than the rest.... everyone has their favourite cricketeers... mine is sourav but i cannot go on and claim he is the best... similarly i like laxman and dravid better... its just that i am more assured when i see those two bat and thats the only thing i had said in the previous thread too which was turned into an issue making me anti-SRT... and therefore i wished it better to refrain from these discussions... I chickened out... lol:giggle:
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: this is going to be evergreen :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Posted
:hysterical::hysterical::hysterical: this is going to be evergreen :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
I wont be surprised if he thinks I use rpt to show Sachin is the greatest :haha:
Posted
I wont be surprised if he thinks I use rpt to show Sachin is the greatest :haha:
at bold- that's the pick up line...doesnn't matter what you use it for...it's still a lol-anator :hysterical:
Posted
at bold- that's the pick up line...doesnn't matter what you use it for...it's still a lol-anator :hysterical:
sure, it is for you as it turns h into z and all you can do is :hysterical: Good to see the fanatics biten by rpt :--D
Posted
I wont be surprised if he thinks I use rpt to show Sachin is the greatest :haha:
i even didnt knew you used it... i just had seen months back someone used it and recentlythere have been lots of jokes and comments on it... sorry if you are the only one who uses it or introduced it cause that can really be hurtful...
Posted
i even didnt knew you used it... i just had seen months back someone used it and recentlythere have been lots of jokes and comments on it... sorry if you are the only one who uses it or introduced it cause that can really be hurtful...
I don't know who introcuced it but I do use it and it hurts others though not me :P
Posted
sure, it is for you as it turns h into z and all you can do is :hysterical: Good to see the fanatics biten by rpt :--D
if by bitten you mean rolling on the floor and laughing then yes it's true :hysterical:
Posted

I don't think there should be any argument against the statement that Sachin (or any Indian batsmen in last couple of decades) never played an innings like 281 in all these 22 years. 96 falls in the league of very good innings where some of Sachin's innings may also be considered. But I won't put that it was decidedly better than all of Sachin's innnings. But then there are many things which Sachin does easily and Laxman can't at all. So no need to put one over other. The fact that I find annoying in all these discussions is, why any statement regarding greatness of any Indian batsman has to be followed by rhetoric of, can Sachin match that? At times I feel people from league of Sachin Fanatic Sucks follow Sachin more than the Sachin Fanatics. Sachin fanatics like me find it very easy to celebrate even a little success of Sachin, while anti Sachin Fanatics always have to work hard, like inventing RPT, to find problems with that celebration.

Posted
if by bitten you mean rolling on the floor and laughing then yes it's true :hysterical:
Yes, more so because from what I recall you didn't read the explaination I gave :giggle:
Posted
I don't think there should be any argument against the statement that Sachin (or any Indian batsmen in last couple of decades) never played an innings like 281 in all these 22 years. 96 falls in the league of very good innings where some of Sachin's innings may also be considered. But I won't put that it was decidedly better than all of Sachin's innnings. But then there are many things which Sachin does easily and Laxman can't at all. So no need to put one over other. The fact that I find annoying in all these discussion is, why any statement regarding greatness of any Indian batsman has to be followed by rhetoric of, can Sachin match that? At times I feel people from league of Sachin Fanatic Sucks follow Sachin more than the Sachin Fanatics. Sachin fanatics like me find it very easy to celebrate even a little success of Sachin, while anti Sachin Fanatics always have to work hard, like inventing RPT, to find problems with that celebration.
This post pretty much sums it
Posted
I do not think he is slightly better IMO to me decidedly better than SRT or for that matter other batsman too based on the fact he has the knack of coming up with these gems in difficult conditions and team ended up winning. Here are some other of VVS's 2nd inning(3rd or 4th match innings) heroics which helped India win close games outside of Eden 281 and Durban 96. Mohali 73* vs Aus Port of Spain 74 vs WI Perth 79 vs Aus Colombo 103* vs SL Johhanesburg 73 vs SA Mumbai 69 vs Aus. Chennai 66 vs Aus It will be very tough to come up with such a list for any of the batsman in team wins like the ones VVS had in recent memory. Instead of making it a comparison between players why can't we accept that VVS has been the best man to perform under crisis in which we won close games.
Absolutely. Sachin is a class apart player no doubt, but when it comes to crunch situations VVS delivers more often than not. As some one pointed out, in one of his Interviews VVS said that he loves to bat and tackle the pressure situation and win/save it for the team. A contrary perspective would be why VVS doesn't deliver when the team is in no trouble (1st Innings) ? So that's the way both of them play. Can't take even a bit away from those two stalwarts. VVS always goes un-noticed (or less noticed) merely because of his stats (hundreds particularly). But people don't notice that the runs he scores (the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s) in crisis is worth a 200.
Posted
Absolutely. Sachin is a class apart player no doubt, but when it comes to crunch situations VVS delivers more often than not. As some one pointed out, in one of his Interviews VVS said that he loves to bat and tackle the pressure situation and win/save it for the team. A contrary perspective would be why VVS doesn't deliver when the team is in no trouble (1st Innings) ? So that's the way both of them play. Can't take even a bit away from those two stalwarts. VVS always goes un-noticed (or less noticed) merely because of his stats (hundreds particularly). But people don't notice that the runs he scores (the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s) in crisis is worth a 200.
how do you guys come up with this kind of stuff? that even defies basic math... 60 = 100? :headshake:
Posted
how do you guys come up with this kind of stuff? that even defies basic math... 60 = 100? :headshake:
Can't reply in the same manner you did. And I never said 60 = 100. Worth was the word.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...