Jump to content

A list of some utterly Asinine and Hideous statements made by the Bradman Fanatics

Guest BossBhai

By Guest BossBhai
in Cricket Talk

Recommended Posts

Patiala Peg Newbie

Patiala Peg

Posted
Posted
Ayyo Rama .... :banghead: Tendulkars record against fast bowlers is well recorded and out there. It is what it is. Now where is the similar evidence for Bradman so that we can do a straight comparison without involving some 3rd player and what he did? Straight answer without twisting or turning. This thread now has more than 500 posts and none of supposedly very rational and open minded and ofcourse factually correct Bradman fans have never even come close to mentioning a few names from Bradman era that you keep telling us were just as good as any that SRT faced. So the reason for avoiding putting up names is what exactly :questionmark:
Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ... Tendulkar when ATG fast bowlers of his era are playing : 47 tests AVG 38.62 http://tinyurl.com/7pbrf2y Tendulkar when ATG fast bowlers of his era are not playing: 138 tests AVG 62.46 http://tinyurl.com/73d2fjt Difference = 23.84 A dip is totally understandable but nearly 24 points avg difference...he has been majorly owned against great fast bowlers !!! Lah jawaab ATG batter. Hehehe. Is it any wonder for someone who has played in the 80's, 90's 2000' and beyond , only for 3 odd years has this record breaker managed to top ICC rankings. Bossbhai...iska jawaab dene mein kyun itni sharma rahe ho ? Hehhee. Koi justification nahi hai isliye ? Don't even talk about Bradman...he dominated against all comers in his day and age. By showing black and white bowling videos from the Charlie Chaplin days in trying to prove a point..you only accentuate the comical value of your posts Hehehe.. As if 3 generations from the cricketing world who have seen him and current day cricketers and consider him incomparable are all ignorant and some forum fruitcake who seems to follow cricket through cricketing databases and black and white videos from the 40's should be taken seriously..hehehe. Here is a guy who played between war time, played between a regular full time job and still god damn averaged 100. UNlike SRT who needs thousands of throw downs before games and countless hours of practice and has a 100 people to take care of his every need and still struggles to stand apart from his own generation in overall averages. Yes..500 posts and counting..you have had nothing to say against his pathetic fall down against ATG bowlers....except for abusing and calling people trolls out of sheer frustration The fact that as his " fanatic" you had no expectation of him in the previous test jab team ke gote gas pe thai ...thats when your agenda stood exposed utterly naked. Bradman..ko chhodo...atleast 5 other batters tower over the little man in test match batting stakes.
Link to comment
Andrew Peter Newbie

Andrew Peter

Posted
Posted
Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ...Duck....Wave ... Tendulkar when ATG fast bowlers of his era are playing : 47 tests AVG 38.62 http://tinyurl.com/7pbrf2y Tendulkar when ATG fast bowlers of his era are not playing: 138 tests AVG 62.46 http://tinyurl.com/73d2fjt Difference = 23.84 A dip is totally understandable but nearly 24 points avg difference...he has been majorly owned against great fast bowlers !!! Lah jawaab ATG batter. Hehehe. Is it any wonder for someone who has played in the 80's, 90's 2000' and beyond , only for 3 odd years has this record breaker managed to top ICC rankings. Bossbhai...iska jawaab dene mein kyun itni sharma rahe ho ? Hehhee. Koi justification nahi hai isliye ? Don't even talk about Bradman...he dominated against all comers in his day and age. By showing black and white bowling videos from the Charlie Chaplin days in trying to prove a point..you only accentuate the comical value of your posts Hehehe.. As if 3 generations from the cricketing world who have seen him and current day cricketers and consider him incomparable are all ignorant and some forum fruitcake who seems to follow cricket through cricketing databases and black and white videos from the 40's should be taken seriously..hehehe. Here is a guy who played between war time, played between a regular full time job and still god damn averaged 100. UNlike SRT who needs thousands of throw downs before games and countless hours of practice and has a 100 people to take care of his every need and still struggles to stand apart from his own generation in overall averages. Yes..500 posts and counting..you have had nothing to say against his pathetic fall down against ATG bowlers....except for abusing and calling people trolls out of sheer frustration The fact that as his " fanatic" you had no expectation of him in the previous test jab team ke gote gas pe thai ...thats when your agenda stood exposed utterly naked. Bradman..ko chhodo...atleast 5 other batters tower over the little man in test match batting stakes.
Tune bataya nahi ki woh Chukhtar Atg Kabse ban gaya ? 200 wicket bhi nahi liye usne aur tu usay jabardasti Atg bana raha hai, etni jhuti tarif toh chukhtar ki Pakistani bhi nahi karte , toh tu etni takleef kyu le raha hai ?
Link to comment
SachDan Newbie

SachDan

Posted
Posted
Tune bataya nahi ki woh Chukhtar Atg Kabse ban gaya ? 200 wicket bhi nahi liye usne aur tu usay jabardasti Atg bana raha hai' date=' etni jhuti tarif toh chukhtar ki Pakistani bhi nahi karte , toh tu etni takleef kyu le raha hai ?[/quote'] :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Link to comment
Patiala Peg Newbie

Patiala Peg

Posted
Posted
Yo Dumbass ... Bradman never faced even one single frikkin bowler who can comfortably get into a World XI chosen by those who know their cricket. Not ONE. The grand total of bowlers of ATG quality from his times is ZERO , POOJI, SHUNYA , SIFAR, MINDA,ZIPPO, ZILCH, NADA. No ***ker with a proper understanding of cricket will ever pick a bowler from the 30s and 40s over bowlers from the 80s onwards. This is why trolls like you are desperately trying to depend on the likes of Lara without realising that the Lara vs SRT comparison has absolutely nothing to do with the main topic of SRT vs DGB. END OF STORY. Now keeping all that in mind and the new stat that you have produced to compare batting between performances against ATG bowlers and lesser bowlers Bradman got owned by Larwood - the only half decent bowler willing to indulge in a bit of aggression - in those times . This is proven by the fact that Bradman got his avg shaved by a cool 40+ points and then threw his weight around and got short pitched bowling banned. Some fearless batsmen he was ehhh ? :hysterical: . Now take that and show that down our throat and choke on it and GTFO of here. Or you can continue to post and provide entertainment for all . Its a free world after all :hehe: This is a direct result of your Patiala wali raddi dukan sey phokat mey milli rapidex English sey seekhi hui angreezi ka kamal .... go read that post again and again ... :cantstop:
Even after his shaved avg as Lurker pointed he was more than SRT. Hehehe For a low IQ abusive personality like yourself, one does not even need to know decent English to reply in suit. Kuch jawaab nahi to gawaar jahilon ki tarah gaali bako aur 40's ke video dikhao. Yes ,yes...for 2-3 decades during Bradman, cricket was a circus..a walk in the park..why because some internet fruitcake lowlife who might have never even picked a bat in his life has seen it all. Hehehe..
Link to comment
Patiala Peg Newbie

Patiala Peg

Posted
Posted

Bossbhai ji, I am sure in 40 years time..when you would have guys clubbing the cricket ball like a baseball and hitting 120 meter sixes every other over...your son would show SRT's prodding and defending video's from 50-60 years to his friends and call it some mockery of cricket..only following your footsteps. Hahaha..

Link to comment
Patiala Peg Newbie

Patiala Peg

Posted
Posted
No sh!t ehhh. So lets see this Lahori Logic : there is no need for you to prove that Bradman could score against ATG fast bowlers but Tendulkar has to. :cantstop: Aaj kaunsi tharra pee li munde ? BTW I was wrong when I said Bradmans avg got shaved by 40 ... it got shaved by 50 points !! Eat sh!t. :hehe:
Shave 40, 45 50 points or whatever you are in the mood to from bradman .. His avg still remains roughly double of what SRT's average is when he plays ATG fast bowlers. HEHE...That double factor does not change. LOL.
I told you way upfront to talk in a bland language and keep your emotions out of it but you kept on hurling insults putdowns , potshots , trolling, being a deadbeat and the usual stuff. So why are you now crying like a girl when you cant handle the heat ? :laugh:
I have been decent all along, I don't call people trolls constantly ( whatever that means ) and what not...when they present differing views. Looking at how ..people have just come and ruthlessly spat on your comic thoughts ..you are the one doing comedy here. Now that you have run away timidly from SRT's pathetic standing in ATG batsmen ranking stakes ..Can Ai assume,you don't want to answer that , ya ? Hehehe You have no regard or respect for the game and probably never picked a cricket bat in your life.
Link to comment
Jimmy Cliff Newbie

Jimmy Cliff

Posted
Posted
^ SRT ki thodi laaj rakhne ke liye. Khush ? Without Chucktar, SRT aur bhi kharab lagta hai...Hehehe. http://tinyurl.com/7czr699. Avg of 37 in about 40 tests. Based on above Marhshall, Holding, Lillee, Imran, Hadlee, Garner..etc ke 80's ke zamaane mein without decent helmet and gear and unlimited bouncers...bechhara kya karta sab har ek team mein koi legendary pace bowler tha..LOL.
Yeah Chucktar has to be removed. And Walsh, Steyn need to be included. SRT thus averages 42.40 against the 8 ATG fast bowlers of his time. Lara IIRC averages about the same against the 5 ATGs he faced-McG/Akram/Waqar/Pollock/Donald. EDIT: Just checked. Lara averages a gargantuan 0.33 runs more than Sachin against the ATG phaaast bowlers he faced. Hence Lara>SRT. Case closed.
Link to comment
bulbul Newbie

bulbul

Posted
Posted

So we are again back to colorful language...funny thing is people who accuse others are the main culprits here.. Add to that we have some opportunistic guy who wont participate in debate but sprinkly smilies when it suits to them.. For all the talk of facing ATG bolwing..Sach didnt faced WI fearsome pace quartet or for that matter much of OZ attack of same time...these are considered even better than the ATG what some mentioned here.... As for quality in Bradman era even if we didnt gave names how it make differece...niethr i niether BB have proof to say there are no quality bolwers all BB have is 15 mins B&W video the only thing this discussion able to do is burst the myth of Sach handled great ATG bowlers better than others...

Link to comment
Patiala Peg Newbie

Patiala Peg

Posted
Posted
Isko kehte hai lauda kat ke haath mey aagaya phir bhi saala tharki wali adat nahi gayi ...
What a frustrated loser ! Your language just exposes your third rate character and personality when cornered . Your language is worst than that of a adiwasi slum dweller. Disgusting. All it shows is that you are intellectually handicapped and go bonkers when exposed and cornered ruthlessly. I have reported you to the moderators of this website.
Link to comment
bulbul Newbie

bulbul

Posted
Posted

^ i stopped preaching about language in posts some time back...no one cares...atleast others dont pretend .. I never claimed neutrality...i made it clear in a post before this thread reopened.. As for ATG bowlers in Bradman era i amde it clear we dont have sufficient videos to prove that....you may be right in telling that era didnt had same kind of Bowlers of this era but you cant simply ignore the Pitch,conditions and the fact that no one else came very close to Bradmans average..all these are linked...just becuase you pick up a point and want answer in only way doesnt mean that there are no other factors involved in that..

Link to comment
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...