A list of some utterly Asinine and Hideous statements made by the Bradman Fanatics

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[b555]

http://indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=212051 thats another Bradman thread almost 3 times as big as this for you to kill some time :cantstop:

BB :woot: happy new year on that quote of yours, i say we make a novel on the topic, a pretty bulky one :D wat say? :--D

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[Jersey #10]

why do you want derail the thread...if you are not interested you can always Ignore this..threa re lot of other good threads in ICF

Then what are you doing? :hysterical:

[bulbul]

Then what are you doing? :hysterical:

i am having a discussion... i am not offtopic for most of the times... Even reduced Smilies as much as possible.. Changed One liners to essays...what elese you need?

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[bulbul]

dude I have asked a simple question ( ATG bowlers from Bradmans time) atleast 3 times and everytime you provide some vague answer never comming up with a clear simple answer. If this is not trolling then what is ?

Harold Larwood Bill Voce Gubby Allen All died

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[bulbul]

Ahh finally some names :woot:. So you would pick these guys ahead of Ambrose' date='Walsh,Bishop,Steyn,Waqar,Wasim in your team ?[/quote'] 1.when did i told that 2. What if they are not in Top 10 or 15 or 25 ? there are instances where with right Pitch and condition even trundlers wrecked havoc... 3. Forget about the names you mentioned even the WI 80's Pace quartet is enough for a team (you know why i mentioning this) end of the day we cant just decide Bradman is Not good because the players are not in ATG list.

[zen]

do you first of understand the illogic and absurdity of reducing five man or four man attack into two and then irrationally declaring bcl or so and so averaged "against these bowlers" when it actually shud mean "against the attack"?? there is a huge difference in what are these one or two bowlers more relevant for "these numbers" ? superior stature or greatness or quality does not translate into greater relevance for these so called "data" (trash anyway because you didn't do basic stat right) Neither guys like you can do basic stat right. and you have all been perpetrating a massive fraud putting forth unreliable garbage data and irrationally relating great bowlers to these "data" without any proper basis.

It is against the attack with those two bowlers "Vs team: w/ a&b" is suppose tell something, no? Also if you had understood the post it ..... Anyways I ll take yours as one more comical posts on this thread .... nothing wrong with the stats. Only thing wrong with it is that it doesn't suit Tendulkar and since it doesn't it must be wrong :giggle:

[zen]

Ahh finally some names :woot:. So you would pick these guys ahead of Ambrose' date='Walsh,Bishop,Steyn,Waqar,Wasim in your team ?[/quote'] And SRT does well against a bowling attack with these vs his peers :haha:

[bulbul]

BB ...some serious questions 1.Do you wont agree Bradmans greatness Because you Worship Sachin.. 2.Lack of Evidence from Old era 3.Do you really think Pitch or conditions doesnt matter there 4.Strongly believe all these year all the experts and whole world got Brainwashed by Bradman propogonda machinery 5.Did you ever thought twice whether Benefit of doubt regarding above can be given to Bradman or Not...

[zen]

Also if we take the new crop of bowlers, SRR vs other Indian batsmen:

Vs steyn-morkel, murali-mendis, anderson-board					
	M	I	No	R	Avg
Gautam	12	22	0	1135	51.59
Sehwag	15	27	1	1339	51.50
Dravid	15	28	3	1187	47.48
Sachin	15	27	2	963	38.52
Laxman	16	28	3	941	37.64

Taking bowlers that mainly both Lara and Tendulkar played, with two best from each team playing (to signify the strength of the bowling attack), we get the below:

	M	I	No	R	Avg
BCLara	36	68	3	3370	51.85
sWaugh	42	66	7	2745	46.53
Inzama	33	56	3	2365	44.62
Anwar	20	33	0	1402	42.48
Sachin	29	49	1	2020	42.08
mWaugh	39	63	2	2408	39.48
Flower	24	44	7	1396	37.73
Dravid	33	58	4	2034	37.67

vs Aus: w/ McGrath and Warne
vs Pak: w/ Wasim and Waqar
vs SA: w/ Donald and Pollock
vs SL: w/ Murali and Vaas
vs WI: w/ Ambrose and Walsh 

/ thread

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --

[bulbul]

/ thread

Rett.. Do you have details like what kind of pitches these players involved.. some one showed u r stat for Murali vs S Waugh is biased...as he scored 130 Runs in one innings and failed in SL... What my opinion is eventhough Murli is considered a Great but he went to OZ and played in those pitches he is even worse than Bhajji... So without seeing at exactly what kind of pitches these peoiple played each other how do we conclude playing against ATG bowlers will decide whether Brdaman is Great or Not?

[zen]

And this has what to do with determining absolute cricketing skills ? SRT's performance against such bowling attack is : X Bradmans performance against such bowling attack is : 0 Thats the end of the story.

Bradman 1928-48 Hutton 1937-55 Sobers 1954-74 Richards 1974-91 Tendulkar 1989-present Note the over-lapping to :--D

[bulbul]

And this has what to do with determining absolute cricketing skills ? SRT's performance against such bowling attack is : X Bradmans performance against such bowling attack is : 0 Thats the end of the story.

but you will never think that Conditions does matter ? Half the OZ vs England matches played in England...as for as i know England condiitons suits to Bowling...evenm now Anderson called as a Home condition bowler... so why you wont even think a minute These trundlers may cause litttle bit problem to Bradman...

[akshayxyz]

http://indiancricketfans.com/showthread.php?t=212051 thats another Bradman thread almost 3 times as big as this for you to kill some time :cantstop:

for dumdum.. if polls are anything to go by.. I voted for don't know/can't say - in the thread BB mentioned... and there are few more so called die-hard-fanatics who voted same (check who voted what for an eye opener).

[bulbul]

for dumdum.. if polls are anything to go by.. I voted for don't know/can't say - in the thread BB mentioned... and there are few more so called die-hard-fanatics who voted same (check who voted what for an eye opener).

i already checked... and for your Info i have made it a tie half an hour Back :two_thumbs_up: I repeat again whatever i post here in ICF its NOT personal...i am not involved in any other Social network sites other than this Site so i dont know the virtual etiquettes if there any...i put wahtever wprds comes into my mind thats all you stiil didnt answered 3 Ediots question...i am just asking not questioning you

[Guest BossBhai]

-- Removed on request of the user --