Jump to content

Bonds Record: Hollow?


coffee_rules

Recommended Posts

Barry Bonds created a new world (series) record by hitting the most career home-runs in MLB history. Any MLB fans here? Read this article dissing him... ---------------------------------------------- Hollow, not hallowed td.yspwidearticlebody { font-size: 13.5px; }By Dan Wetzel, Yahoo! Sports August 7, 2007 Long gone and a long time coming, the Barry Bonds-propelled baseball soared into the California sky and right through history; a history no one will ever be able to fully explain to future generations of skeptical fans. Bonds has hit 756 home runs, the most ever, but it isn't just the number that comes with a performance-enhancing-inspired asterisk. It's Bonds himself, it's baseball as a whole, it's an era of sports where rule-breaking is rampant and honest heroes such as Henry Aaron are in the shortest of supplies. Around the country, Bonds' home run will be met with cheers and curses but mostly with shrugged shoulders and pointed fingers. There are a multitude of guilty targets. If this was supposedly the making of history, then realize history isn't going to make much of this. Ten, 30, 50 years from now, it will be looked upon with bewilderment – did people really celebrate a phony number that punctuated a fraudulent era of the game? No one will give much credence to what happened in Major League Baseball from, say, 1996 to the advent of mandatory steroids testing. Bonds swung, connected and sent a ball out of the park 756 different times in his 22-season career. But it takes Easter Bunny-level gullibility to believe he did it naturally. His numbers are nonsensical – most notably the absurd 73 homers in 2001, a total 19.7 percent greater than Roger Maris' mark of 61, which hasn't been touched without massive suspicion in 46 years and counting. Forty-six year old records don't just fall by 19.7 percent. Or even by the 14.7 percent Mark McGwire exceeded Maris' record in 1998. If someone were to shave 19.7 percent off the current world record in the mile run (3:43.13), he'd finish at 2:59.2. Yes, a three-minute mile. You think you'd believe something so statistically improbable? How about 100-meter dash in 7.8 seconds? You think your grandkids would buy that one, or mock it as some old fish story? Guess what, they aren't going to believe 73, either. And without those, Bonds didn't pass Aaron. Bonds' ties to disgraced BALCO labs, the fact that his personal trainer is behind bars for refusal to turn over evidence on him, and the possible federal indictment on perjury charges this fall means that 756 deceives only the most dim or devout. The saddest part is that Bonds never needed it, that in surpassing the most hallowed record in baseball he tarnished his reputation to the point his apologists have to remind people that he was Hall-of-Fame-worthy long before baseball's "Steroid Era" began. Bonds should be hitting his, say, 650th clean homer about now, continuing to build the case that he is the greatest ballplayer of all time. That is how great he was, and is. He never needed the juice. His legacy would have been so much greater, meant so much more without it. But that wasn't enough. In the exhaustive Bonds biography "Love Me, Hate Me," it is surmised that he was jealous over the attention lapped on McGwire, a lesser talent who looked comically juiced as he clubbed the 70 questionable home runs in 1998. And, that is where this is about so much more than Bonds. That is why the melancholy of this record falling sweeps over a cast of the craven. This is baseball's shame too, from commissioner Bud Selig on down. Inside the game, they knew the numbers of the late 1990s were as artificial as the players' biceps. No one dared to care. This was about making money after the disastrous canceling of the 1994 World Series. The world Bonds and the others operated in came with tacit approval from above. Bonds may be a lout – a man born into privilege who would throw his jock on the floor, not in a nearby hamper, so he could watch a low-paid clubhouse worker pick it up – but he didn't start the drug era. He did it naturally and fumed while a bunch of clowns surpassed him. So if you can't beat 'em, join 'em, right? It isn't excusable, of course. But at the time, it was all so clouded. No testing. No concern. No comment. Just Selig, team owners and the players perpetuating a dishonest game on the fans. "I'm sick of Bud Selig and Major League Baseball, the way they've been grandstanding," Detroit Tigers outfielder Gary Sheffield ranted to USA Today. "Why doesn't Bud Selig tell the truth? Why does he keep lying and saying he doesn't know nothing about nothing? He knew everything (about steroids) we (the players) knew. "Bud Selig wants to talk about the integrity of the game? To him, the integrity of the game is how much money they make." Selig maintains he knew nothing definitive, and that his efforts to take action earlier were met by the stiff resistance from the players' union. In the court of public opinion, though, Selig is seen as no more believable than Bonds. That soaring shot, No. 756, is just one more reminder of an era that will be impossible to defend to future fans. These numbers aren't real, they aren't true. The accomplishments will be written off and ridiculed like stats from the turn of the 20th century. In 1904, considered part of the "modern era," Jack Chesbro won 41 games and recorded a 1.82 ERA, pitching all season on two days rest. Does anyone consider that the greatest season of all time by a starting pitcher? Or do you scoff at the competition considering that today's far better conditioned pitchers – some on juice themselves – only start about 34 games a year? Perhaps Chesbro really was great. But how could you know? His numbers are so out of line they actually weaken, not bolster, his reputation. That's what Bonds will deal with decades from now. His home run total isn't the asterisk, he is. He didn't need the juice. But neither did Bud Selig's baseball. The whole game gets an asterisk because together they chased the easy money, the momentary glory. But time has a leveling effect, and with the home run chase over we can finally get on with tomorrow. History promises to be scornful, not just of Bonds, but of Selig and his cronies, and of the players' union, who led this great game, America's pastime, down a dark road, leaving behind numbers that future generations will never accept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't knock 756 homers. He was hitting them big long before the steroids scandal. It's amazing how the entire game came to a stand-still once he hit it. The Nationals even won the game, but nobody will remember that. That pr*ck A-Rod will break the record sometime in the future. He already has 500 PS; this is in the wrong forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

watch it whnever they show it on espn but dont follow it as passionately as cricket ...what happened to derek jeter???? idhar kabhi baseball atta tha tabhi he was the most popular player(this was around late 90's- 2000 abhi uska naam hi nahin itna..... abhi koi A-rod (alex rodriguez) bandha hain

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the year of the Lord 1998 , when Mark McGwire broke the hollowed single season home run record of Legendary Babe Ruth , American public embraced him with the same zeal a born again Christian would embrace Jesus. Every Tom , Dick and harry knew that he was on Steroid and was juiced up. Parallels can be drawn between Bonds and Mcgwire. Guys who started their career as skinny lads playing for Philly and Oakland respectively become juiced up into massive bulky He-man. The only difference being McGwire is White and Bonds is Black. Pray tell me , why Bonds gets so much flak ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the year of the Lord 1998 ' date=' when Mark McGwire broke the hollowed single season home run record of Legendary Babe Ruth , American public embraced him with the same zeal a born again Christian would embrace Jesus. Every Tom , Dick and harry knew that he was on Steroid and was juiced up. Parallels can be drawn between Bonds and Mcgwire. Guys who started their career as skinny lads playing for Philly and Oakland respectively become juiced up into massive bulky He-man. [b']The only difference being McGwire is White and Bonds is Black. Pray tell me , why Bonds gets so much flak ?
Et tu brute! The reason Bonds get more flak than Mcgraw is rather simple. Mark Mcgraw was popular at a time when Baseball was lot more popular. America's favorite past time and all that. The downward spiral started in mid to late 90s what with player strikes, steroid scandals and muted fixing allegations. So much so that US President had to mention in Congress that something had to be done about steroids. Make no mistake that suggestion was not for Professional football(where players are juiced up too) but more for baseball. Over the years the support for baseball has come down a lot. If you look around at your workplace you will see the support for baseball is limited to elderly these days. Most young guns dont watch it. It is not appealing enough and part of the problem obviously has been steroid scandals one after another. Bond clearly has benefitted from steroid. He would still have ended with 600-650 HR otherwise but steroids took him to another level. xxx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...