coffee_rules Posted August 9, 2007 Posted August 9, 2007 He said, "Well the fielders were pretty convinced that Kartik had nicked it, he was out and the umpire too thought so". When did the fielders convincing appeal lead to the umpire giving a batsman out? Am I watching a different game than Test cricket? He kept quiet when Howell howled again who couldn't see the splinter from the inside edge that he thought was not. He had no words for that bozo....
sm332 Posted August 9, 2007 Posted August 9, 2007 evidently ... Kartik felt he nicked it as narrated to Shastri
coffee_rules Posted August 9, 2007 Author Posted August 9, 2007 why is it so difficult to use snicko? Snicko showed no snick. The ball just went past the bat with no himalayas on the screen.
Anakin Posted August 9, 2007 Posted August 9, 2007 why is it so difficult to use snicko? Because the current system works for the albinos
yoda Posted August 9, 2007 Posted August 9, 2007 Snicko showed no snick. The ball just went past the bat with no himalayas on the screen. i know. i mean why the fuk can't the umpires be asked to refer to snicko atleast when there isn't a clear deviation.
coffee_rules Posted August 9, 2007 Author Posted August 9, 2007 I am mocking DL's logic. If the players were convinced, then how is it a given?
yoda Posted August 9, 2007 Posted August 9, 2007 I am mocking DL's logic. If the players were convinced' date=' then how is it a given?[/quote'] DL's a dick.
King Tendulkar Posted August 10, 2007 Posted August 10, 2007 DL's a dick. Accurate post! Atherton is even worse!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now