Raghav_12 Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 So much confidence and bravado and neta ji goes for safe option. Not only for modi or for congress netas' date=' this whole idea of fighting elections from more than 1 seat is stupid.[/quote'] Yes, it is extremely stupid thing to do and a criminal waste of resources. Anybody who is leaving seat as he/she won from other seat as well, should be made to bear whole expense. I don't understand how such an irresponsible person can be considered potential candidate to run the country. Didn't see previous declared PM candidates like Vajpyee in 2004 or Advani in election of 2009 or any of Sonia and Rahul contesting from multiple seats.
bulbul Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 ^ When a person who does U-turn every hour & lies every 2 hours can aspire to become PM why not a 3 time CM can't dream of being PM :((
Raghav_12 Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 ^ When a person who does U-turn every hour & lies every 2 hours can aspire to become PM why not a 3 time CM can't dream of being PM :(( he can.. he must show more courage and responsibility.
Number Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 What about courage responsibility when Arvind ji ran away with his tail tucked between legs after 49 days. And Aapies shouldnt talk about wastage of resources.:giggle:
bulbul Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 ^ What courage, he is helping party by contesitng there. It's all fien & well shouting courage,end of day party needs more seats & votes. UP is teh biggest state in India,holds key to parliament,so if this gives encouragement to grassroot party workers what else party needs? In bigger scheme of things this is fine and it's not like happened first time in history.
Raghav_12 Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 What about courage responsibility when Arvind ji ran away with his tail tucked between legs after 49 days. And Aapies shouldnt talk about wastage of resources.:giggle: lol.. How a government can run with support of 27 MLA's in a house of 70? Either we need education in Math or in Civics. But in any case these questions are against Modi. Whether Kejriwal is good or bad won't do anything to mitigate the charges of irresponsible behavior and cowardice behavior that Mr. Modi has shown.
Raghav_12 Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 In between blatant and insulting snubbing of BJP top leaders continues unabated. One wanted to contest from the seat where he was MP last time, but he was forced out. Other didn't want to , but he was forced in. I again repeat, party has been seized. Hope country survives.
JaiRamesh2 Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 In between blatant and insulting snubbing of BJP top leaders continues unabated. One wanted to contest from the seat where he was MP last time, but he was forced out. Other didn't want to , but he was forced in. I again repeat, party has been seized. Hope country survives. Look who is talking, Delhi didn't even survive for 49 days :hysterical: and Kejri aspiring to run the country. :haha:
bulbul Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 lol.. How a government can run with support of 27 MLA's in a house of 70? Either we need education in Math or in Civics. But in any case these questions are against Modi. Whether Kejriwal is good or bad won't do anything to mitigate the charges of irresponsible behavior and cowardice behavior that Mr. Modi has shown. So AAP ddin't knew the math before forming Govt. Oh,i forgot, AAP math teacher is Con party :giggle:
Number Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 Indira Gandhi contested from Medak and Rae Bareli in 1980. Sonia contested from Bellari and Amethi in 1999 iirc. Lalu contested from 2 seats within Bihar. It is all part of strategy rather than cowardice. Modi can not and should not give up Gujrat and BJP needs a boost in the UP hence Varanasi.
Number Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 I believe a candidate who is as strong as Modi will be given the safest seat and will not be made to contest from any seat where it seems that he might lose. If Modi had doubts that he might lose from Varanasi then he wouldn't have contested from there at all.
Raghav_12 Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 Indira Gandhi contested from Medak and Rae Bareli in 1980. Sonia contested from Bellari and Amethi in 1999 iirc. Lalu contested from 2 seats within Bihar. It is all part of strategy rather than cowardice. Modi can not and should not give up Gujrat and BJP needs a boost in the UP hence Varanasi. I can understand the logic of going to eastern UP. That area sends lot of MP's to parliament and if party feel Modi going there may boost, party's chances then that can be called a strategic move. But then why hold on to Varodara? With all the tall claims you should be brave enough to say you'll win from Varanasi, a seat which has wrested from a veteran.
Number Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 I can understand the logic of going to eastern UP. That area sends lot of MP's to parliament and if party feel Modi going there may boost' date=' party's chances then that can be called a strategic move. But then why hold on to Varodara? With all the tall claims you should be brave enough to say you'll win from Varanasi, a seat which has wrested from a veteran.[/quote'] It doesn't look good on his part to leave Gujrat like that. I feel if he has to retain one seat after elections it will be Varodara.
Number Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 1. Modi contesting only from Gujrat. AAP-Con : He is scared. 2. Modi contesting only from Varanasi . AAP-Con : He is betraying people of Gujrat. 3. Modi contesting from both the seats. AAP-Con : He is a coward.
Crookbond Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 I know this is an old article but read through it for Amit Shah's (former Gujarat Home Minister) comments. 489 Gujarat farmers have committed suicide since 2003 http://www.hindu.com/2007/10/14/stories/2007101456521400.htm
Raghav_12 Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 1. Modi contesting only from Gujrat. AAP-Con : He is scared. 2. Modi contesting only from Varanasi . AAP-Con : He is betraying people of Gujrat. 3. Modi contesting from both the seats. AAP-Con : He is a coward. True. I'll extend that. If Kejriwal contests from Varansahi - He wants to stay in media focus. If Kejriwal doesn't contest from Varanasi - he is U-Turn-ist and coward. That's how life is :-)
bulbul Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 True. I'll extend that. If Kejriwal contests from Varansahi - He wants to stay in media focus. If Kejriwal doesn't contest from Varanasi - he is U-Turn-ist and coward. That's how life is :-) Kejri & AAP only creating all drama. Did anyone asked AAP to announce Kejri may contest against Modi outside Gujarath. If they kept quiet no one should have talked about publicity gimmick.
JaiRamesh2 Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 True. I'll extend that. If Kejriwal contests from Varansahi - He wants to stay in media focus. If Kejriwal doesn't contest from Varanasi - he is U-Turn-ist and coward. That's how life is :-) :hysterical: again superficial comparison of Kejriwal to Modi. Dream on boy.
JaiRamesh2 Posted March 20, 2014 Posted March 20, 2014 Digvijaya in Varanasi: Four reasons why he could be Cong’s Mr Right Read more at: http://www.firstpost.com/politics/digvijaya-in-varanasi-four-reasons-why-he-could-be-congs-mr-right-1442481.html?utm_source=ref_article The retard liar will now have the joker to keep him company for opposition to Modi in Varanasi:hysterical:
randomGuy Posted March 21, 2014 Posted March 21, 2014 NAGPUR: An Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader has alleged that he has found some proof of wrongdoing by former BJP national president Nitin Gadkari who is contesting for the Lok Sabha from Nagpur. Ajit Sawant, a Congress rebel and now an AAP leader from Mumbai, has alleged Gadkari accepted Rs 25 lakh from Reatox Builders and Developers Private Limited, the developers of First City Township project in Mihan and Rs 31.45 lakh from Dattatraya Mhaiskar's Ideal Road Builders (IRB) for "favours granted". The money was then routed to Purti Power and Sugar Limited through Update Mercantile Private Limited, one of the 16 shell companies connected to Gadkari. The transactions took place when Gadkari was the chairman of Purti Group. Sawant said Reatox Builders also gave a donation of Rs 50 lakh to the BJP in 2009-10. "Further, Congress and NCP leaders are protecting and giving 'pro-development' certificate to Gadkari despite all these corrupt practices," said Sawant, adding they do not have any evidence against the Congress nominee from city Vilas Muttemwar. A few days ago, AAP national convener Arvind Kejriwal had said Gadkari and Muttemwar had connections with Reatox, an allegation that AAP withdrew in a press conference on Wednesday. "Political leaders like Gadkari are engaged in massive money laundering and routing black money into their business establishments through shell companies. I had earlier exposed about unaccounted money coming into Gadkari's Purti company, in October 2012. Close associated and family members were directors in the shell companies," Sawant said. "Now, I have all documents to prove Gadkari's link with Reatox and IRB. Gadkari should withdraw from the elections," he said. Gadkari denied the allegations. "Ajit Sawant has been making these allegations since last year and there is nothing new in it. Purti group is cooperating with all authorities concerned with the developments and will continue to do so. Sawant's allegations seem to clearly politically motivated," said Gadkari who did not respond to TOI's specific questions emailed to him. Sawant said the IT department did not do a proper investigation of Gadkari's affairs even though all documents of the "misdoings" were available with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). "The CBI too remained silent by not investigating into money laundering," he said. TOI's queries which Gadkari didn't answer 1. Congress MP Vilas Muttemwar has denied that he has anything to do with Reatox and also that he is not together with you in this venture as claimed by Arvind Kejriwal recently. Why haven't you issued any denial? 2. Documents obtained from Ministry of Corporate Affairs about Update Mercantile revealed that unsecured loan of Rs 25 lakh was taken from Reatox Builders, Rs 31.45 lakh from IRB and Rs 30 lakh from Awani Electricals. An unsecured loan of Rs 20 lakh was taken from Nitin Gadkari himself. Later, a major chunk of the money was transferred to Purti Sugar and shown as an investment. In 2007 when the transactions were done, Update Mercantile Jaykumar Varma, Pahade, Panse, Zade and others who are all linked to Purti and Gadkari. 3. Why did Reatox, IRB, Awani Electricals lend money to Gadkari and his company Purti? Were any special favours granted to these companies? 4. Is it a coincidence that the year Reatox lent money — 2006-07 — was the same in which it got contract to build First City in Mihan? 5. Why did Mr Gadkari give unsecured loan to Update Mercantile which was managed by his own people and from where did the money come from? http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/lok-sabha-elections-2014/news/AAP-provides-proof-against-Nitin-Gadkari/articleshow/32380554.cms?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=timesofindia
Recommended Posts