Crookbond Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 Now I am thinking Munaf and Nehra weren't that bad after all Isay bring both of them back as they can't possibly start off with 0/20 off 2 overs everytime. Quite true that. Munaf is a very good first change bowler, keeps it tight. Nehra at least in some games was ok at bowling in the death.
Ultimate_Game Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 Quite true that. Munaf is a very good first change bowler' date=' keeps it tight. Nehra at least in some games was ok at bowling in the death.[/quote'] Nehra is the only death bowler we have, unfortunately, which isn't saying much. But at least Nehra can get a few yokers in at the death occasionally when the rest either bowl length or full tosses.
Crookbond Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 Nehra is the only death bowler we have' date=' unfortunately, which isn't saying much. But at least Nehra can get a few yokers in at the death occasionally when the rest either bowl length or full tosses.[/quote'] In the 1 year leading to the WC, it's Nehra who was our go to death bowler. His contribution against Pakistan is quite forgotten. People don't forgive him for the game against South Africa.
Ultimate_Game Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 In the 1 year leading to the WC' date=' it's Nehra who was our go to death bowler. His contribution against Pakistan is quite forgotten. People don't forgive him for the game against South Africa.[/quote'] He was our best bowler against Pak in WC semis, and if he had been fit for the finals in place of Sreesanth that game would have ben over at the break itself. I don't think we would be chasing more than 220-230 if Nehra was around in the finals.
Cricket Tragic Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 1. Did someone declare him next big thing based on ODI performances ? 2. Is Sami really the poorest bowler in ODIs for Pakistan. Best post in this dire thread.
CG Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 He was our best bowler against Pak in WC semis' date=' and if he had been fit for the finals in place of Sreesanth that game would have ben over at the break itself. I don't think we would be chasing more than 220-230 if Nehra was around in the finals.[/quote'] are u forgetting what mr nehra did in the previous matches or his performances in last few odi tourneys before wc like in sa.
Ultimate_Game Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 are u forgetting what mr nehra did in the previous matches or his performances in last few odi tourneys before wc like in sa. I would go with his recent performances and he clearly would have been way better than Sreesanth who gave away 0/46 ioff 5 overs. Zak applied plenty of pressure on SL batsmen only for Sreesanth to release it. If even a half-decent bowler was there at the other end I doubt SL would have gotten away.
CG Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 I would go with his recent performances and he clearly would have been way better than Sreesanth who gave away 0/46 ioff 5 overs. Zak applied plenty of pressure on SL batsmen only for Sreesanth to release it. If even a half-decent bowler was there at the other end I doubt SL would have gotten away. Sree bowled a good first spell.anyways nehra is gone for good.
SLICKR392 Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 Quite true that. Munaf is a very good first change bowler' date=' keeps it tight. [b']Nehra at least in some games was ok at bowling in the death. ++ He doesn't bowl too many slow ones but bowls really good yorkers in the death.
Ultimate_Game Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 Sree bowled a good first spell.anyways nehra is gone for good. Did we watch the same game? in his first spell Zak had 3 consecutive maidens whereas Sreesanth was taken for 12 or so runs in just a single over. He was way too short and wide and easily targeted by Dilshan.
CG Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 Did we watch the same game? in his first spell Zak had 3 consecutive maidens whereas Sreesanth was taken for 12 or so runs in just a single over. He was way too short and wide and easily targeted by Dilshan. 1.1 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, huge appeal for lbw first up, Aleem Dar says not out. That ball pitched on a length around leg stump. Dilshan went to smash it on the leg side and missed. That would have missed leg 1.2 Sreesanth to Dilshan, (no ball) 1 run, Dilshan gets tucked up by a length ball and plays on the leg side, Sreesanth had over-stepped and there's a free hit coming up ... India didn't concede an extra until very late in the innings against Pakistan. They've already conceded three today 1.2 Sreesanth to Tharanga, 1 run, 140.5 kph, the free-hit is a well-directed delivery nearly in the blockhole, Tharanga digs it out on the on side and has broken the bat in his process, it will need changing 1.3 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 142.9 kph, good length just outside off stump, punched from the crease towards cover point 1.4 Sreesanth to Dilshan, 2 runs, 136.1 kph, Dilshan drives the length ball hard off the back foot towards cover point where Raina dives to his left and takes the pace off the ball 1.5 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 136.3 kph, Sreesanth bowls a full ball on leg stump, Dilshan missed out there, failing to make contact with the flick. The ball hit the pad 1.6 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 133.9 kph, Dilshan goes hard at the ball, trying to cut it through point. He doesn't time it though and hits it hard into the ground Sri Lanka 7/0 S Sreesanth 1-0-5-0 3.1 Sreesanth to Dilshan, 1 run, 137.4 kph, Dilshan opens the face and steers the ball towards third man 3.2 Sreesanth to Tharanga, 1 run, 135.4 kph, that's some pretty sloppy work from India. Sreesanth didn't attempt to stop a mis-timed drive past him, Tendulkar ran towards his left from mid-on and missed the ball, mid off was covering though 3.3 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 144.5 kph, played off the front foot towards the off side 3.4 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 133.5 kph, good length just outside off, Dilshan punches off the back foot, the timing is good but the placement is straight to the fielder at cover 3.5 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 134.5 kph, fuller ball pitching on off and shaping away a touch, Dilshan leans into the drive and finds short cover 3.6 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 134.0 kph, Dilshan times a punch from the crease sweetly but the fielder at short cover is in the way again. They've hit the fielders today, not the gaps Sri Lanka 9/0 S Sreesanth 2-0-7-0 5.1 Sreesanth to Dilshan, FOUR, 133.6 kph, and there it is! A touch too short and Dilshan dismisses it with a pull off the front foot, hit in the air but over midwicket 5.2 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 145.2 kph, Sreesanth beats Dilshan's attempt at a booming drive on the up with a delivery that pitches short of a length outside off and bounces nicely, that was measured at 145.3 kph 5.3 Sreesanth to Dilshan, FOUR, 138.9 kph, and again! Dilshan releases the pressure by cutting a short and wide ball from outside off to the backward point boundary. Loose ball, put away 5.4 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 135.8 kph, tighter line and length closer to off stump, Dilshan punches towards cover 5.5 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 126.3 kph, Dilshan tries to drive through the line on the front foot but doesn't make good contact with a length delivery on off, he plays that to mid-off 5.6 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 136.2 kph, a touch slower and a lot straighter around middle and off, Dilshan tries to drive again but slices it towards point Sri Lanka 17/0 S Sreesanth 3-0-15-0 10.1 Sreesanth to Dilshan, 2 runs, 132.6 kph, too straight from Sreesanth and Dilshan flicks the ball towards Gambhir at deep square 10.2 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 130.7 kph, length ball outside off and Dilshan drives off the front foot, doesn't get past Kohli at short cover 10.3 Sreesanth to Dilshan, 1 run, 134.8 kph, this time he drives on the up and through the gap at cover, there's a fielder at the deep though 10.4 Sreesanth to Sangakkara, no run, 136.8 kph, fuller length around off, driven towards mid off on the front foot 10.5 Sreesanth to Sangakkara, no run, 133.3 kph, Sangakkara tries to drive through the off but gets an inside edge towards the leg side 10.6 Sreesanth to Sangakkara, no run, 133.5 kph, fuller length, played off the front foot towards mid-on First spell was good but due to lack of fitness he was exposed in second spell.nowadays our bowlers average economy rate is 6
JaFanatic Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 Did we watch the same game? in his first spell Zak had 3 consecutive maidens whereas Sreesanth was taken for 12 or so runs in just a single over. He was way too short and wide and easily targeted by Dilshan.
Ultimate_Game Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 1.1 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, huge appeal for lbw first up, Aleem Dar says not out. That ball pitched on a length around leg stump. Dilshan went to smash it on the leg side and missed. That would have missed leg 1.2 Sreesanth to Dilshan, (no ball) 1 run, Dilshan gets tucked up by a length ball and plays on the leg side, Sreesanth had over-stepped and there's a free hit coming up ... India didn't concede an extra until very late in the innings against Pakistan. They've already conceded three today 1.2 Sreesanth to Tharanga, 1 run, 140.5 kph, the free-hit is a well-directed delivery nearly in the blockhole, Tharanga digs it out on the on side and has broken the bat in his process, it will need changing 1.3 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 142.9 kph, good length just outside off stump, punched from the crease towards cover point 1.4 Sreesanth to Dilshan, 2 runs, 136.1 kph, Dilshan drives the length ball hard off the back foot towards cover point where Raina dives to his left and takes the pace off the ball 1.5 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 136.3 kph, Sreesanth bowls a full ball on leg stump, Dilshan missed out there, failing to make contact with the flick. The ball hit the pad 1.6 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 133.9 kph, Dilshan goes hard at the ball, trying to cut it through point. He doesn't time it though and hits it hard into the ground Sri Lanka 7/0 S Sreesanth 1-0-5-0 3.1 Sreesanth to Dilshan, 1 run, 137.4 kph, Dilshan opens the face and steers the ball towards third man 3.2 Sreesanth to Tharanga, 1 run, 135.4 kph, that's some pretty sloppy work from India. Sreesanth didn't attempt to stop a mis-timed drive past him, Tendulkar ran towards his left from mid-on and missed the ball, mid off was covering though 3.3 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 144.5 kph, played off the front foot towards the off side 3.4 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 133.5 kph, good length just outside off, Dilshan punches off the back foot, the timing is good but the placement is straight to the fielder at cover 3.5 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 134.5 kph, fuller ball pitching on off and shaping away a touch, Dilshan leans into the drive and finds short cover 3.6 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 134.0 kph, Dilshan times a punch from the crease sweetly but the fielder at short cover is in the way again. They've hit the fielders today, not the gaps Sri Lanka 9/0 S Sreesanth 2-0-7-0 5.1 Sreesanth to Dilshan, FOUR, 133.6 kph, and there it is! A touch too short and Dilshan dismisses it with a pull off the front foot, hit in the air but over midwicket 5.2 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 145.2 kph, Sreesanth beats Dilshan's attempt at a booming drive on the up with a delivery that pitches short of a length outside off and bounces nicely, that was measured at 145.3 kph 5.3 Sreesanth to Dilshan, FOUR, 138.9 kph, and again! Dilshan releases the pressure by cutting a short and wide ball from outside off to the backward point boundary. Loose ball, put away 5.4 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 135.8 kph, tighter line and length closer to off stump, Dilshan punches towards cover 5.5 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 126.3 kph, Dilshan tries to drive through the line on the front foot but doesn't make good contact with a length delivery on off, he plays that to mid-off 5.6 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 136.2 kph, a touch slower and a lot straighter around middle and off, Dilshan tries to drive again but slices it towards point Sri Lanka 17/0 S Sreesanth 3-0-15-0 10.1 Sreesanth to Dilshan, 2 runs, 132.6 kph, too straight from Sreesanth and Dilshan flicks the ball towards Gambhir at deep square 10.2 Sreesanth to Dilshan, no run, 130.7 kph, length ball outside off and Dilshan drives off the front foot, doesn't get past Kohli at short cover 10.3 Sreesanth to Dilshan, 1 run, 134.8 kph, this time he drives on the up and through the gap at cover, there's a fielder at the deep though 10.4 Sreesanth to Sangakkara, no run, 136.8 kph, fuller length around off, driven towards mid off on the front foot 10.5 Sreesanth to Sangakkara, no run, 133.3 kph, Sangakkara tries to drive through the off but gets an inside edge towards the leg side 10.6 Sreesanth to Sangakkara, no run, 133.5 kph, fuller length, played off the front foot towards mid-on First spell was good but due to lack of fitness he was exposed in second spell.nowadays our bowlers average economy rate is 6 So you are saying 3 overs 0/15 is a good start when the bowler at other end has figures of 1 wkt for 0 runs in 3 :omg: And it's not just the no. of runs, he didn't even pose any threat to the Lankan batsmen when the pitch had some life in it early on. I mean Lankans were finding it tough to just hang in there against Zak and against Sreesanth they were easily able to leave the deliveries, play him out or score runs. If we had a bowler who could simply pitch it at the right lenth the way Nehra had done in the last game against Pakis, SL would have been in deep trouble.
CG Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 So you are saying 3 overs 0/15 is a good start when the bowler at other end has figures of 1 wkt for 0 runs in 3 :omg: And it's not just the no. of runs' date=' he didn't even pose any threat to the Lankan batsmen when the pitch had some life in it early on. I mean Lankans were finding it tough to just hang in there against Zak and against Sreesanth they were easily able to leave the deliveries, play him out or score runs. If we had a bowler who could simply pitch it at the right lenth the way Nehra had done in the last game against Pakis, SL would have been in deep trouble.[/quote'] you cannot compare zak with sree he was the best bowler of tourney.i do not agree he did pose any threat he beat the bat on couple of occasions.there was no guarantee about nehra as he had been horrible in most wc matches.
Ultimate_Game Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 you cannot compare zak with sree .i do not agree he did pose any threat he beat the bat on couple of occasions.there was no guarantee about nehra as he had been horrible in most wc matches. Nope Sreesanth was too short in the final allowing Lankan batsmen to easily see him off. And Nehra comfortably outbowled Sreesanth in the World Cup, and I doubt he would be as bad as Sreesanth. Nehra at least pitches the ball up which is exactly what was required in the final with the pitch aiding the fast bowlers initially but Sreesanth wasted the new ball. If we had pitched it up like Zak did from the other end either we would have gotten one more early wkt, or at the very least kept Lankans to a very low score in the first 10 forcing mistakes from them. Sreesanth gave them the breathing room allowing them to keep their wkts intact for the charge later on.
CG Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 Nope Sreesanth was too short in the final allowing Lankan batsmen to easily see him off. And Nehra comfortably outbowled Sreesanth in the World Cup' date=' and I doubt he would be as bad as Sreesanth. Nehra at least pitches the ball up which is exactly what was required in the final with the pitch aiding the fast bowlers initially but Sreesanth wasted the new ball. If we had pitched it up like Zak did from the other end either we would have gotten one more early wkt, or at the very least kept Lankans to a very low score in the first 10 forcing mistakes from them. Sreesanth gave them the breathing room allowing them to keep their wkts intact for the charge later on.[/quote'] we won wc that matters.any ways no point in going back.
Ultimate_Game Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 we won wc that matters.any ways no point in going back. I was simply saying the win could have been achieved in an easier fashion but as you rightly said we digress.
1983-2011 Posted July 26, 2012 Author Posted July 26, 2012 nehra only played 3 matches and he just has one bad game against saffers
thongale Posted July 26, 2012 Posted July 26, 2012 if but...prove it...where are the videos..there is evidence of umesh bowling at 150+ in the past few months...where is your evidence my friend.On same speed guns, and same conditions, Sami cracked 148k, and Yadav is at 145k. :--D
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now