Texy Posted August 21, 2012 Posted August 21, 2012 Back in the day, when he was a playboy in London, the most common nickname for him was 'Im the Dim' -Salman Rushdie about the Pakistani cricketer-turned-politician Imran Khan in a speech Saturday in India Salman Rushdie made a passionate call for India's citizens to fight to protect free speech in New Delhi on Saturday night. "People here are asleep, very much asleep, and you need to wake up," he said to hundreds of prominent businessmen, politicians and intellectuals. "You keep the freedoms you fight for and you lose those you neglect," he said. But his speech may well be best remembered for its virtual evisceration of Imran Khan, the cricketer turned politician who has tried to position himself as the face of moderate, modern Pakistan. Mr. Khan declined to attend the Saturday event, an annual conference sponsored by the India Today publishing group, citing the immeasurable hurt that Mr. Rushdie's writings have caused Muslims around the world. Mr. Khan was to be the keynote speaker at the event, and when he pulled out Mr. Rushdie was elevated to the top spot. Mr. Rushdie said Saturday night he would try to put the term ÅÊmmeasurable hurt in the ÅÄontext of the real world for Mr. Khan. "Immeasurable hurt is caused to the Muslim community by terrorists based in Pakistan who act in the name of Islam, he said. Immeasurable hurt is caused to the Muslim community by Osama bin Laden finding shelter in Pakistan, and by a recent survey that showed that 80 percent of Pakistanis see Osama bin Laden as a hero," he said. Immeasurable hurt is caused to the community by the enormous economic hardships and lack of education that result from mullah-driven politics," he said. "Imran Khan would do well to talk about the immeasurable hurt caused by these things," Mr. Rushdie said, rather than creating a bogeyman out of Mr. Rushdie. Mr. Rushdie is becoming a sort of totemic figure for India's appetite for and protection of free speech, since he was forced to cancel a scheduled appearance at the Jaipur Literature Festival earlier this year in the face of death threats and protests. Muslim leaders spoke against his scheduled appearance in Old Delhi on Friday, but there were no protestors outside the Taj Palace hotel, where Saturday's speech was held. Mr. Rushdie's appearance at the conference caused several scheduled speakers, including prominent politicians, to pull out. Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee and the newly elected young chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, Akhilesh Singh Yadav, who has portrayed himself as a modern, forward-thinking leader, were among the no-shows. Mr. Rushdie called that "dumb and depressing. The politicians were running when no one says boo," he said, "And that's what we used to call in the old days cowardice." While no representative from India's reigning political family, the Gandhis, was scheduled to appear at the conference, they were not spared Mr. Rushdie's sharp tongue. Some say the Congress party-led United Progressive Alliance, which is in power now, helped to keep Mr. Rushdie from the Jaipur Literary festival this year to appease some Muslim leaders. "It didn't even work, Rahul," he said, referring to Rahul Gandhi, who campaigned in Uttar Pradesh, India's largest state, to little effect in recent elections. "Years and years of kneeling down in front of every mullah you could find, and it did not even work," he said. It was often clear Saturday night that Mr. Rushdie, who sported a black Nehru jacket, was enjoying himself even as he raised serious concerns about Indian society today. After offering up Mr. Khan's nickname, he challenged the politician to a debate "Anytime, anywhere before clarifying, with a smile, well, maybe not anywhere." Mr. Rushdie's 1988 novel, 'The Satanic Verses,' angered many Muslims, some of whom declared a fatwa against him. Mr. Rushdie criticized Mr. Khan's attempts to present himself as the face of moderate Pakistan, while placating Pakistan's mullah and armies, to hearty applause from the audience. "This is what we call exercising freedom of speech," he then told the audience. "It feels pretty good, doesn't it? he said to laughter and applause. Later, in a question and answer session, he asked "Have you noticed the physical resemblance between Imran Khan and Qaddafi, the Libyan dictator?" Despite the levity, at its heart Mr. Rushdie's appearance in New Delhi on Saturday night remained a battle cry. "There is a cultural war being waged in India today against freedom of speech," he said, "and it is being carried out while the general public sits by, mostly, indifferently. Thanks to bullying and violence by both Hindus and Muslims, voices are being silenced, to chilling effect," he said, "Violence is very real and growing in this country," he said. "India deserves to be led better than it is being led," he said, "But it can only be done by all." He concluded his speech by saying "Please do not let the battle be lost." Article from March 17, 2012 in NY TIMES :hatsoff: Mr. Rushdie
mhr123 Posted August 21, 2012 Posted August 21, 2012 i think 80 percent is a bit of exaggeration ...30 % of them may religious, 20% cult who regard him as "so called" hero... and 5% have given Fatwa again Bin Laden and against so called "Jihad e Kashmir " and you would be amazaed these are the ones who are called Wahabi who are giving Fatwa... Hafiz Saeed who is heading LeT has also been named as a part of agency. Mostly they regard it as an agency / political gimmick to create unrest in Kashmir valleys .. Most of the Saudi ulema have given Fatwa against Bin Laden .. have called him Khawarij .which means a person who "one who rebels against the acknowledged Muslim ruler" ... a person cannot rebel against a ruler until he stops from Praying.. I wonder where were all these so called Jihadies before 1990's ... when Kashmir was regarded as Paradise on earth , making tons of money via tourism.Normally they say that Indian troops have made life miserable for Kashmiries ,but it was unheard of before 1990's .. only after frequent attacks and crossing the LOC Indian Govt.within there rights started pumping in more armies... and when it did so crossing border became more difficult for our friends... there were clashes .. there are also news that these guys used to kill kashmiries to blame the Indian Troops... Someone who have back stabbed us at Kargil .. should we trust them..
Texy Posted August 22, 2012 Author Posted August 22, 2012 I wonder where were all these so called Jihadies before 1990's ... when Kashmir was regarded as Paradise on earth , making tons of money via tourism.Normally they say that Indian troops have made life miserable for Kashmiries ,but it was unheard of before 1990's .. only after frequent attacks and crossing the LOC Indian Govt.within there rights started pumping in more armies... and when it did so crossing border became more difficult for our friends... there were clashes .. there are also news that these guys used to kill kashmiries to blame the Indian Troops... Someone who have back stabbed us at Kargil .. should we trust them.. +1 100% agree According to recent Pew global poll in Pakistan....
adi B Posted August 22, 2012 Posted August 22, 2012 i think 80 percent is a bit of exaggeration ...30 % of them may religious, 20% cult who regard him as "so called" hero... and 5% have given Fatwa again Bin Laden and against so called "Jihad e Kashmir " and you would be amazaed these are the ones who are called Wahabi who are giving Fatwa... Hafiz Saeed who is heading LeT has also been named as a part of agency. Mostly they regard it as an agency / political gimmick to create unrest in Kashmir valleys .. Most of the Saudi ulema have given Fatwa against Bin Laden .. have called him Khawarij .which means a person who "one who rebels against the acknowledged Muslim ruler" ... a person cannot rebel against a ruler until he stops from Praying.. I wonder where were all these so called Jihadies before 1990's ... when Kashmir was regarded as Paradise on earth , making tons of money via tourism.Normally they say that Indian troops have made life miserable for Kashmiries ,but it was unheard of before 1990's .. only after frequent attacks and crossing the LOC Indian Govt.within there rights started pumping in more armies... and when it did so crossing border became more difficult for our friends... there were clashes .. there are also news that these guys used to kill kashmiries to blame the Indian Troops... Someone who have back stabbed us at Kargil .. should we trust them.. so true
Recommended Posts