Jump to content

Australia Tour of India 2013 |Feb-Mar|


SLICKR392

Australia Tour of India 2013 |Feb-Mar|  

  1. 1.

    • Dhawan
      4
    • Dinda
      3
    • Ojha
      6
    • Rahane
      4


Recommended Posts

Posted

LOL Hughes. I didnt think we could do worse than in 2008 and 2010 in india, but this will be 4-0 so easily. At least in 2010 in those two losses they were closely fought hard wins, right to the death, this current tour is just too easy for India. Im sure Indian fans might be surprised at how easy India is doing it, but no aussie fans really thought we were much of a chance, we arent as good as England, and have been fumbling around ALL summer with horrible management and selections.

Posted
LOL Hughes. I didnt think we could do worse than in 2008 and 2010 in india' date=' but this will be 4-0 so easily. At least in 2010 in those two losses they were closely fought hard wins, right to the death, this current tour is just too easy for India. Im sure Indian fans might be surprised at how easy India is doing it, but no aussie fans really thought we were much of a chance, we arent as good as England, and have been fumbling around ALL summer with horrible management and selections.[/quote'] What has actually surprised most Indian fans is that England showed how it's done in sub-continent just a few months back but Aussies didn't look as if they even saw the series. Aussies aren't as good a team as England in SC conditions, but this Aussie performance really has been quite underwhelming.
Posted
no Pujara' date='Vijay there too[/quote'] I agree with the pujara bit (he may have had a positive impact)... but vijay would probably have flopped big time in australia.... anyhow, at least vijay has used this opportunity... now let's see how much further he can progress.
Posted
LOL Hughes. I didnt think we could do worse than in 2008 and 2010 in india' date=' but this will be 4-0 so easily. At least in 2010 in those two losses they were closely fought hard wins, right to the death, this current tour is just too easy for India. Im sure Indian fans might be surprised at how easy India is doing it, but no aussie fans really thought we were much of a chance, we arent as good as England, and have been fumbling around ALL summer with horrible management and selections.[/quote'] Don't worry, you guys still have the Big Bash League. In my opinion, that is the best Domestic league for T20 and ODI cricket B->
Posted
Maybe you missed his darts on the leg and one a few of which go down the leg for 5 wides :giggle:
Ohhhhhhhh so thats why they call him Dartbhajan, because of his huge wides that he bowls down the leg side :hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical::hysterical:
Posted

Glenn Maxwell is a horrible bowler In T20s vs WI: got hit for 4 sixes in a row by Sunil Narine In Tests vs India: 10-0-55-0 WHY DO THEY KEEP PLAYING THIS GUY AUSTRALIA, HELLO?

Posted

He's not meant to be a bowler actually. It's the same thing they did with Cameron Smith in 2008. Maxwell is a batting all-rounder they have picked at No.8 in the bowling slot. It doesn't make any sense. Australia blundered by not picking Steven O'Keefe. He's a left-arm orthodox who is a decent batsman too. They could have combined him with Lyon and pick Krejza probably as the back up offspinner.

Posted
He's not meant to be a bowler actually. It's the same thing they did with Cameron Smith in 2008. Maxwell is a batting all-rounder they have picked at No.8 in the bowling slot. It doesn't make any sense. Australia blundered by not picking Steven O'Keefe. He's a left-arm orthodox who is a decent batsman too. They could have combined him with Lyon and pick Krejza probably as the back up offspinner.
I know, but they should get a real allrounder because Maxwell isn't fantastic with the bat anyway and even bowling allrounders can bat as decently as him.
Posted
I know' date=' but they should get a real allrounder because Maxwell isn't fantastic with the bat anyway and even bowling allrounders can bat as decently as him.[/quote'] Yep completely agree. Steve O'Keefe would have been the best choice. However even in the squad. Doherty and Lyon together would have been a better option, even though Lyon got smashed in the first test.
Posted
Yep completely agree. Steve O'Keefe would have been the best choice. However even in the squad. Doherty and Lyon together would have been a better option, even though Lyon got smashed in the first test.
I agree, too bad they have no better options in the squad than Lyon and Doherty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...